儿童钝性胸主动脉损伤:了解患者大小的作用和胸血管内主动脉修复的利用。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Heather Grubbs, Katherine B Snyder, Kenneth Stewart, Alisa Cross, Alessandra Landmann, Jeremy Johnson, Benjamin Greif, Paul McGaha
{"title":"儿童钝性胸主动脉损伤:了解患者大小的作用和胸血管内主动脉修复的利用。","authors":"Heather Grubbs, Katherine B Snyder, Kenneth Stewart, Alisa Cross, Alessandra Landmann, Jeremy Johnson, Benjamin Greif, Paul McGaha","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracic aortic trauma management includes nonoperative observation, open repair, or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). While TEVAR is frequently used in adults, there is no standardized treatment for pediatric thoracic aortic trauma despite many pediatric patients with adult-equivalent height and weight. We aim to better understand the management of blunt pediatric thoracic aortic trauma by evaluating patient size and interventions as well as the utilization of TEVAR in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Participant User Files with thoracic aortic trauma identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes. Patients younger than 18 years with blunt thoracic aortic trauma from 2017 to 2022 were included. Injury mechanism, patient height/weight, blood product requirements, diagnosis/injury scoring, concomitant injuries, operative interventions, length of stay, and mortality were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 346 patients with blunt thoracic aortic trauma younger than 18 years who met the inclusion criteria, 135 underwent TEVAR, 24 underwent open repair, and 187 were nonoperative. The mean ages for the open and TEVAR cohorts were 15.5 and 15.6 years, respectively. The mean height and weight were 165.1 cm and 71 kg for open repair patients, 171.7 cm and 80.5 kg for TEVAR patients, and 163.5 cm and 67.9 kg for the nonoperative patients (p < 0.01). Mortality rates for patients surviving the emergency department were 27.8% for nonoperative, 16.7% for open, and 3.7% for TEVAR (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite increased critical care and prolonged hospital stays, patients undergoing TEVAR demonstrated better outcomes with lower mortality rates and higher likelihood of discharge home rather than to rehab or nursing facilities. This highlights the need for consideration of height, weight, and anatomy in addition to age for thoracic aortic trauma management and could lead to increased utilization of TEVAR in this population with improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric blunt thoracic aortic injuries: Understanding the role of patient size and utilization of thoracic endovascular aortic repair.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Grubbs, Katherine B Snyder, Kenneth Stewart, Alisa Cross, Alessandra Landmann, Jeremy Johnson, Benjamin Greif, Paul McGaha\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracic aortic trauma management includes nonoperative observation, open repair, or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). While TEVAR is frequently used in adults, there is no standardized treatment for pediatric thoracic aortic trauma despite many pediatric patients with adult-equivalent height and weight. We aim to better understand the management of blunt pediatric thoracic aortic trauma by evaluating patient size and interventions as well as the utilization of TEVAR in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Participant User Files with thoracic aortic trauma identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes. Patients younger than 18 years with blunt thoracic aortic trauma from 2017 to 2022 were included. Injury mechanism, patient height/weight, blood product requirements, diagnosis/injury scoring, concomitant injuries, operative interventions, length of stay, and mortality were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 346 patients with blunt thoracic aortic trauma younger than 18 years who met the inclusion criteria, 135 underwent TEVAR, 24 underwent open repair, and 187 were nonoperative. The mean ages for the open and TEVAR cohorts were 15.5 and 15.6 years, respectively. The mean height and weight were 165.1 cm and 71 kg for open repair patients, 171.7 cm and 80.5 kg for TEVAR patients, and 163.5 cm and 67.9 kg for the nonoperative patients (p < 0.01). Mortality rates for patients surviving the emergency department were 27.8% for nonoperative, 16.7% for open, and 3.7% for TEVAR (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite increased critical care and prolonged hospital stays, patients undergoing TEVAR demonstrated better outcomes with lower mortality rates and higher likelihood of discharge home rather than to rehab or nursing facilities. This highlights the need for consideration of height, weight, and anatomy in addition to age for thoracic aortic trauma management and could lead to increased utilization of TEVAR in this population with improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004709\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸主动脉创伤的处理包括非手术观察、开放修复或胸血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)。虽然TEVAR经常用于成人,但对于儿童胸主动脉创伤,尽管许多儿童患者的身高和体重与成人相当,但没有标准化的治疗方法。我们的目的是通过评估患者的大小和干预措施以及TEVAR在这一人群中的应用,更好地了解钝性儿童胸主动脉外伤的处理。方法:回顾性分析美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善参与者用户档案中经《国际疾病分类第十版》编码鉴定的胸主动脉创伤。纳入了2017年至2022年年龄小于18岁的钝性胸主动脉创伤患者。回顾了损伤机制、患者身高/体重、血制品要求、诊断/损伤评分、伴发损伤、手术干预、住院时间和死亡率。结果:我们确定了346例年龄小于18岁的钝性胸主动脉创伤患者,符合纳入标准,135例接受了TEVAR, 24例接受了开放修复,187例非手术治疗。开放组和TEVAR组的平均年龄分别为15.5岁和15.6岁。开放修复组平均身高165.1 cm、体重71 kg, TEVAR组平均身高171.7 cm、体重80.5 kg,非手术组平均身高163.5 cm、体重67.9 kg (p < 0.01)。急诊存活患者的死亡率非手术组为27.8%,开放组为16.7%,TEVAR组为3.7% (p < 0.01)。结论:尽管重症监护增加,住院时间延长,接受TEVAR治疗的患者表现出更好的结果,死亡率更低,出院回家的可能性更高,而不是去康复中心或护理机构。这强调了胸主动脉创伤治疗除了考虑年龄外,还需要考虑身高、体重和解剖结构,并可能导致该人群中TEVAR的利用率增加,患者预后改善。证据水平:治疗/护理管理;第三层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric blunt thoracic aortic injuries: Understanding the role of patient size and utilization of thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Background: Thoracic aortic trauma management includes nonoperative observation, open repair, or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). While TEVAR is frequently used in adults, there is no standardized treatment for pediatric thoracic aortic trauma despite many pediatric patients with adult-equivalent height and weight. We aim to better understand the management of blunt pediatric thoracic aortic trauma by evaluating patient size and interventions as well as the utilization of TEVAR in this population.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Participant User Files with thoracic aortic trauma identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes. Patients younger than 18 years with blunt thoracic aortic trauma from 2017 to 2022 were included. Injury mechanism, patient height/weight, blood product requirements, diagnosis/injury scoring, concomitant injuries, operative interventions, length of stay, and mortality were reviewed.

Results: We identified 346 patients with blunt thoracic aortic trauma younger than 18 years who met the inclusion criteria, 135 underwent TEVAR, 24 underwent open repair, and 187 were nonoperative. The mean ages for the open and TEVAR cohorts were 15.5 and 15.6 years, respectively. The mean height and weight were 165.1 cm and 71 kg for open repair patients, 171.7 cm and 80.5 kg for TEVAR patients, and 163.5 cm and 67.9 kg for the nonoperative patients (p < 0.01). Mortality rates for patients surviving the emergency department were 27.8% for nonoperative, 16.7% for open, and 3.7% for TEVAR (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Despite increased critical care and prolonged hospital stays, patients undergoing TEVAR demonstrated better outcomes with lower mortality rates and higher likelihood of discharge home rather than to rehab or nursing facilities. This highlights the need for consideration of height, weight, and anatomy in addition to age for thoracic aortic trauma management and could lead to increased utilization of TEVAR in this population with improved patient outcomes.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信