急诊科快速序贯插管时吸痰对氧合的影响:一项多中心先导随机对照试验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Reuben J Strayer, Matthew Oliver, Aaron Chen, Louis Gerges, Nicholas D Caputo
{"title":"急诊科快速序贯插管时吸痰对氧合的影响:一项多中心先导随机对照试验。","authors":"Reuben J Strayer, Matthew Oliver, Aaron Chen, Louis Gerges, Nicholas D Caputo","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trends in emergency airway management encourage longer periods of suction, and the use of more powerful suction devices. Whether the intensity of oropharyngeal suction during laryngoscopy causes more rapid desaturation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Study objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether longer duration of suction leads to more significant desaturation in Emergency Department patients undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 academic tertiary care level 1 trauma centers. Emergency Department patients undergoing RSI and laryngoscopy were randomized to either as needed suction or constant suction. The primary outcome was the decrease in oxygen saturation from the time the laryngoscope blade entered the mouth until endotracheal tube confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients were enrolled (37 in as needed suction, 39 in constant suction). The median absolute drop in saturation was 0% (IQR 0-1) in the as needed suction group and also 0% (IQR 0-0) in the constant group (p = 0.321).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found that constant suctioning during Emergency Department laryngoscopy facilitated by RSI does not cause more rapid desaturation compared to as needed suctioning. However, the reliability of these results is limited by the small sample size and convenience sampling which likely skewed the cohort to patients less likely to develop hypoxia. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and their implications for emergency airway management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Suctioning on Oxygenation During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Reuben J Strayer, Matthew Oliver, Aaron Chen, Louis Gerges, Nicholas D Caputo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.04.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent trends in emergency airway management encourage longer periods of suction, and the use of more powerful suction devices. Whether the intensity of oropharyngeal suction during laryngoscopy causes more rapid desaturation is unknown.</p><p><strong>Study objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether longer duration of suction leads to more significant desaturation in Emergency Department patients undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 academic tertiary care level 1 trauma centers. Emergency Department patients undergoing RSI and laryngoscopy were randomized to either as needed suction or constant suction. The primary outcome was the decrease in oxygen saturation from the time the laryngoscope blade entered the mouth until endotracheal tube confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients were enrolled (37 in as needed suction, 39 in constant suction). The median absolute drop in saturation was 0% (IQR 0-1) in the as needed suction group and also 0% (IQR 0-0) in the constant group (p = 0.321).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found that constant suctioning during Emergency Department laryngoscopy facilitated by RSI does not cause more rapid desaturation compared to as needed suctioning. However, the reliability of these results is limited by the small sample size and convenience sampling which likely skewed the cohort to patients less likely to develop hypoxia. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and their implications for emergency airway management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.04.016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.04.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近急诊气道管理的趋势鼓励更长时间的吸引,并使用更强大的吸引装置。喉镜检查时口咽吸的强度是否会导致更快的去饱和尚不清楚。研究目的:本研究旨在确定在急诊科接受快速顺序插管(RSI)的患者中,较长的吸痰时间是否会导致更明显的去饱和。方法:在3个三级创伤专科中心进行多中心随机对照试验。急诊科接受重复性肢体损伤和喉镜检查的患者随机分为需要吸痰组和持续吸痰组。主要结果是从喉镜刀片进入口腔到气管内插管确认时血氧饱和度下降。结果:共纳入76例患者(按需吸痰37例,持续吸痰39例)。按需吸痰组饱和度绝对中位数下降0% (IQR 0-1),恒吸痰组饱和度绝对中位数下降0% (IQR 0-0) (p = 0.321)。结论:本研究发现,在急诊科喉镜检查中,与需要时进行吸痰相比,由RSI促进的持续吸痰并不会导致更快的去饱和。然而,这些结果的可靠性受到样本量小和方便抽样的限制,这可能使队列偏向于不太可能发生缺氧的患者。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现及其对紧急气道管理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Suctioning on Oxygenation During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department: A Multi-Center Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Recent trends in emergency airway management encourage longer periods of suction, and the use of more powerful suction devices. Whether the intensity of oropharyngeal suction during laryngoscopy causes more rapid desaturation is unknown.

Study objective: This study aimed to determine whether longer duration of suction leads to more significant desaturation in Emergency Department patients undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI).

Methods: A multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 academic tertiary care level 1 trauma centers. Emergency Department patients undergoing RSI and laryngoscopy were randomized to either as needed suction or constant suction. The primary outcome was the decrease in oxygen saturation from the time the laryngoscope blade entered the mouth until endotracheal tube confirmation.

Results: A total of 76 patients were enrolled (37 in as needed suction, 39 in constant suction). The median absolute drop in saturation was 0% (IQR 0-1) in the as needed suction group and also 0% (IQR 0-0) in the constant group (p = 0.321).

Conclusion: The study found that constant suctioning during Emergency Department laryngoscopy facilitated by RSI does not cause more rapid desaturation compared to as needed suctioning. However, the reliability of these results is limited by the small sample size and convenience sampling which likely skewed the cohort to patients less likely to develop hypoxia. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and their implications for emergency airway management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信