Cheng Wang, Ya Ding, Qikang Hu, Bin Wang, Shouzhi Xie, Zhi Yang, Zhe Zhang, Dexing Dai, An Xiong, Ruoman Sun, Yali Ling, Lei Qiu, Fenglei Yu, Zhongjian Xie, Muyun Peng
{"title":"Omega-6/Omega-3比值是肺癌的保护因素:多不饱和脂肪酸与肺腺癌风险的孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Cheng Wang, Ya Ding, Qikang Hu, Bin Wang, Shouzhi Xie, Zhi Yang, Zhe Zhang, Dexing Dai, An Xiong, Ruoman Sun, Yali Ling, Lei Qiu, Fenglei Yu, Zhongjian Xie, Muyun Peng","doi":"10.7150/jca.112416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While observational studies have reported conflicting associations between polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and lung cancer risk, the causal role of specific PUFA subtypes remains unclear. <b>Methods:</b> Leveraging genome-wide association data from the UK Biobank and International Lung Cancer Consortium, we employed univariable, multivariable, and bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to investigate the causal effects of seven PUFA traits (including omega-3, DHA, EPA, omega-6, LA, AA, and the omega-6/omega-3 ratio) on lung cancer and its subtypes. <b>Results:</b> Our primary finding revealed a robust protective effect of a higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio against overall lung cancer (IVW: OR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.96; <i>P_value</i> = 0.009) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (IVW: OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.89; <i>P_value</i> = 0.0005). Conversely, elevated omega-3 and DHA levels were associated with increased LUAD risk. These associations persisted after adjusting for BMI, smoking, and potential pleiotropy. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study provides the first causal evidence that a higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio reduces lung cancer risk, particularly LUAD, through multivariable and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses that account for BMI, smoking, and genetic pleiotropy. These findings highlight the ratio's potential as a novel and modifiable dietary target for prevention, offering actionable insights beyond prior studies focused on individual PUFA subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"16 8","pages":"2649-2662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omega-6/Omega-3 Ratio as a Protective Factor in Lung Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study on Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Wang, Ya Ding, Qikang Hu, Bin Wang, Shouzhi Xie, Zhi Yang, Zhe Zhang, Dexing Dai, An Xiong, Ruoman Sun, Yali Ling, Lei Qiu, Fenglei Yu, Zhongjian Xie, Muyun Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.7150/jca.112416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While observational studies have reported conflicting associations between polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and lung cancer risk, the causal role of specific PUFA subtypes remains unclear. <b>Methods:</b> Leveraging genome-wide association data from the UK Biobank and International Lung Cancer Consortium, we employed univariable, multivariable, and bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to investigate the causal effects of seven PUFA traits (including omega-3, DHA, EPA, omega-6, LA, AA, and the omega-6/omega-3 ratio) on lung cancer and its subtypes. <b>Results:</b> Our primary finding revealed a robust protective effect of a higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio against overall lung cancer (IVW: OR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.96; <i>P_value</i> = 0.009) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (IVW: OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.89; <i>P_value</i> = 0.0005). Conversely, elevated omega-3 and DHA levels were associated with increased LUAD risk. These associations persisted after adjusting for BMI, smoking, and potential pleiotropy. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study provides the first causal evidence that a higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio reduces lung cancer risk, particularly LUAD, through multivariable and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses that account for BMI, smoking, and genetic pleiotropy. These findings highlight the ratio's potential as a novel and modifiable dietary target for prevention, offering actionable insights beyond prior studies focused on individual PUFA subtypes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"2649-2662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170990/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.112416\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.112416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然观察性研究报道了多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)与肺癌风险之间的相互矛盾的关联,但特定PUFA亚型的因果作用仍不清楚。方法:利用来自UK Biobank和国际肺癌协会的全基因组关联数据,我们采用单变量、多变量和双向孟德尔随机化(MR)分析来研究7种PUFA性状(包括omega-3、DHA、EPA、omega-6、LA、AA和omega-6/omega-3比例)对肺癌及其亚型的因果关系。结果:我们的主要发现揭示了较高的omega-6/omega-3比例对整体肺癌的强大保护作用(IVW: OR = 0.87;95% ci: 0.78-0.96;P_value = 0.009)和肺腺癌(LUAD) (IVW: OR = 0.78;95% ci: 0.67-0.89;P_value = 0.0005)。相反,omega-3和DHA水平升高与LUAD风险增加有关。在调整BMI、吸烟和潜在的多效性后,这些关联仍然存在。结论:本研究通过考虑BMI、吸烟和遗传多效性的多变量和双向孟德尔随机化分析,首次提供了较高的omega-6/omega-3比值降低肺癌风险,特别是LUAD风险的因果证据。这些发现强调了该比例作为一种新型的、可改变的预防饮食目标的潜力,提供了超越以往专注于个体PUFA亚型的研究的可行见解。
Omega-6/Omega-3 Ratio as a Protective Factor in Lung Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study on Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk.
Background: While observational studies have reported conflicting associations between polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and lung cancer risk, the causal role of specific PUFA subtypes remains unclear. Methods: Leveraging genome-wide association data from the UK Biobank and International Lung Cancer Consortium, we employed univariable, multivariable, and bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to investigate the causal effects of seven PUFA traits (including omega-3, DHA, EPA, omega-6, LA, AA, and the omega-6/omega-3 ratio) on lung cancer and its subtypes. Results: Our primary finding revealed a robust protective effect of a higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio against overall lung cancer (IVW: OR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.96; P_value = 0.009) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (IVW: OR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.89; P_value = 0.0005). Conversely, elevated omega-3 and DHA levels were associated with increased LUAD risk. These associations persisted after adjusting for BMI, smoking, and potential pleiotropy. Conclusion: This study provides the first causal evidence that a higher omega-6/omega-3 ratio reduces lung cancer risk, particularly LUAD, through multivariable and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses that account for BMI, smoking, and genetic pleiotropy. These findings highlight the ratio's potential as a novel and modifiable dietary target for prevention, offering actionable insights beyond prior studies focused on individual PUFA subtypes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.