Yu Lei, Yaowei Bai, Xiatong Bai, Jiacheng Liu, Bo Sun, Wenlong Wu, Xiaoling Zhi, Yang Su, Hongsen Zhang, Chuansheng Zheng
{"title":"TACE增强免疫检查点抑制剂和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂在不可切除HCC中的作用:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Yu Lei, Yaowei Bai, Xiatong Bai, Jiacheng Liu, Bo Sun, Wenlong Wu, Xiaoling Zhi, Yang Su, Hongsen Zhang, Chuansheng Zheng","doi":"10.7150/jca.112706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to treatment with TKI and ICI alone. <b>Methods</b>: The study included 286 patients with advanced HCC, of which 210 were treated with TACE, TKI, and ICI (TACE+T+I group) and 76 with TKI and ICI alone (T+I group). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed. A nomogram was developed to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their one-year and two-year survival probabilities. <b>Results</b>: Patients in the TACE+T+I group demonstrated significantly longer PFS (8.4 months vs. 4.0 months, Log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.0016) and median OS (14.5 months vs. 10.0 months, Log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.0001) compared to the T+I group. Additionally, the TACE+T+I group had a higher ORR (56.7% vs. 21.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.002) and DCR (84.3% vs. 72.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.023). Both groups exhibited good tolerance to adverse events. A nomogram incorporating factors such as therapeutic strategy, prothrombin time (PT), age, and tumor size effectively categorized patients into low- and high-risk groups with notably different survival outcomes. <b>Conclusion</b>: These findings suggest that TACE combined with TKI and ICI significantly improved survival outcomes and showed good safety compared to TKI and ICI alone in the treatment of advanced HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"16 8","pages":"2750-2761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TACE Empowers Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Unresectable HCC: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Lei, Yaowei Bai, Xiatong Bai, Jiacheng Liu, Bo Sun, Wenlong Wu, Xiaoling Zhi, Yang Su, Hongsen Zhang, Chuansheng Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.7150/jca.112706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to treatment with TKI and ICI alone. <b>Methods</b>: The study included 286 patients with advanced HCC, of which 210 were treated with TACE, TKI, and ICI (TACE+T+I group) and 76 with TKI and ICI alone (T+I group). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed. A nomogram was developed to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their one-year and two-year survival probabilities. <b>Results</b>: Patients in the TACE+T+I group demonstrated significantly longer PFS (8.4 months vs. 4.0 months, Log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.0016) and median OS (14.5 months vs. 10.0 months, Log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.0001) compared to the T+I group. Additionally, the TACE+T+I group had a higher ORR (56.7% vs. 21.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.002) and DCR (84.3% vs. 72.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.023). Both groups exhibited good tolerance to adverse events. A nomogram incorporating factors such as therapeutic strategy, prothrombin time (PT), age, and tumor size effectively categorized patients into low- and high-risk groups with notably different survival outcomes. <b>Conclusion</b>: These findings suggest that TACE combined with TKI and ICI significantly improved survival outcomes and showed good safety compared to TKI and ICI alone in the treatment of advanced HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 8\",\"pages\":\"2750-2761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.112706\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.112706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本多中心回顾性研究的目的是评估经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性,与TKI和ICI单独治疗相比。方法:纳入286例晚期HCC患者,其中TACE+ TKI + ICI组210例(TACE+T+I组),TKI + ICI组76例(T+I组)。评估无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。根据患者一年和两年的生存概率,采用nomogram方法将患者分为高危组和低危组。结果:与T+I组相比,TACE+T+I组患者的PFS(8.4个月比4.0个月,Log-rank P = 0.0016)和中位OS(14.5个月比10.0个月,Log-rank P < 0.0001)显着延长。此外,TACE+T+I组有较高的ORR(56.7%比21.1%,P = 0.002)和DCR(84.3%比72.4%,P = 0.023)。两组对不良事件均表现出良好的耐受性。结合治疗策略、凝血酶原时间(PT)、年龄和肿瘤大小等因素的nomogram (nomogram)将患者有效地分为低危组和高危组,生存结果明显不同。结论:与TKI和ICI单用相比,TACE联合TKI和ICI治疗晚期HCC可显著改善生存结局,且具有良好的安全性。
TACE Empowers Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Unresectable HCC: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Purpose: The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to treatment with TKI and ICI alone. Methods: The study included 286 patients with advanced HCC, of which 210 were treated with TACE, TKI, and ICI (TACE+T+I group) and 76 with TKI and ICI alone (T+I group). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed. A nomogram was developed to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their one-year and two-year survival probabilities. Results: Patients in the TACE+T+I group demonstrated significantly longer PFS (8.4 months vs. 4.0 months, Log-rank P = 0.0016) and median OS (14.5 months vs. 10.0 months, Log-rank P < 0.0001) compared to the T+I group. Additionally, the TACE+T+I group had a higher ORR (56.7% vs. 21.1%, P = 0.002) and DCR (84.3% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.023). Both groups exhibited good tolerance to adverse events. A nomogram incorporating factors such as therapeutic strategy, prothrombin time (PT), age, and tumor size effectively categorized patients into low- and high-risk groups with notably different survival outcomes. Conclusion: These findings suggest that TACE combined with TKI and ICI significantly improved survival outcomes and showed good safety compared to TKI and ICI alone in the treatment of advanced HCC.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.