提高死因医学证明的完整性和减少错误:电子死亡率软件对印度南部三级保健中心的影响。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Abinavsharvesh Thanigasalam, Ramadoss Ramu, Kanagarethinam Rajarethinam
{"title":"提高死因医学证明的完整性和减少错误:电子死亡率软件对印度南部三级保健中心的影响。","authors":"Abinavsharvesh Thanigasalam, Ramadoss Ramu, Kanagarethinam Rajarethinam","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_1394_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives Mortality statistics are crucial for understanding public health. Accurate medical certification of cause of death (MCCD) is essential for good mortality statistics. However, the quality of MCCD form-filling remains a concern. Based on the learnings from the ICMR-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (ICMR-NCDIR), e-Mortality software implementation project, our institute developed and used a new in-house mortality software for MCCD from January 2021. This study compared MCCD forms before and after implementation of the mortality software. Methods The study was conducted from March 2024 to July 2024 in the department of Medicine at a tertiary care teaching institute in Puducherry. We analysed 105 hand-written forms from the year 2020 and 105 software-generated forms from the year 2021, focusing on completeness, errors, and International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) compatibility. We checked 13 items for completeness. Errors were categorised as major or minor, depending on how they affected ICD-10 coding. Results The proportion of completeness improved from 4 to 19 per cent after software introduction (P<0.001). Minor errors significantly decreased from 96 to 81 per cent (P<0.002). About 88 per cent of hand-written forms had major errors, which was significantly reduced to 42 per cent in software-generated forms (P<0.001). Compatibility of the underlying cause of death for generating ICD-10 coding improved from 73 to 96 per cent (P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions The findings of this study suggest that our mortality software significantly improved completeness and modestly reduced errors. Other institutions may consider adopting an electronic format for MCCD to improve completeness and accuracy. We emphasise regular training of doctors and auditing of MCCD forms to further improve the quality of death certification.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"161 4","pages":"420-424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving completeness & reducing errors in medical certification of cause of death: The impact of electronic mortality software in a tertiary care centre in South India.\",\"authors\":\"Abinavsharvesh Thanigasalam, Ramadoss Ramu, Kanagarethinam Rajarethinam\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/IJMR_1394_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background & objectives Mortality statistics are crucial for understanding public health. Accurate medical certification of cause of death (MCCD) is essential for good mortality statistics. However, the quality of MCCD form-filling remains a concern. Based on the learnings from the ICMR-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (ICMR-NCDIR), e-Mortality software implementation project, our institute developed and used a new in-house mortality software for MCCD from January 2021. This study compared MCCD forms before and after implementation of the mortality software. Methods The study was conducted from March 2024 to July 2024 in the department of Medicine at a tertiary care teaching institute in Puducherry. We analysed 105 hand-written forms from the year 2020 and 105 software-generated forms from the year 2021, focusing on completeness, errors, and International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) compatibility. We checked 13 items for completeness. Errors were categorised as major or minor, depending on how they affected ICD-10 coding. Results The proportion of completeness improved from 4 to 19 per cent after software introduction (P<0.001). Minor errors significantly decreased from 96 to 81 per cent (P<0.002). About 88 per cent of hand-written forms had major errors, which was significantly reduced to 42 per cent in software-generated forms (P<0.001). Compatibility of the underlying cause of death for generating ICD-10 coding improved from 73 to 96 per cent (P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions The findings of this study suggest that our mortality software significantly improved completeness and modestly reduced errors. Other institutions may consider adopting an electronic format for MCCD to improve completeness and accuracy. We emphasise regular training of doctors and auditing of MCCD forms to further improve the quality of death certification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"161 4\",\"pages\":\"420-424\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_1394_2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_1394_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的死亡率统计数据对于了解公共卫生至关重要。准确的死因医学鉴定对于良好的死亡率统计至关重要。然而,mcd表格填写的质量仍然令人担忧。根据icmr -国家疾病信息学与研究中心(ICMR-NCDIR)电子死亡率软件实施项目的经验,我院自2021年1月起开发并使用了一套新的MCCD内部死亡率软件。本研究比较了死亡率软件实施前后的MCCD表格。方法研究于2024年3月至2024年7月在普都切里市一所三级保健教学学院医学系进行。我们分析了2020年的105份手写表格和2021年的105份软件生成表格,重点关注完整性、错误和国际疾病分类-10 (ICD-10)兼容性。我们检查了13个项目的完整性。根据对ICD-10编码的影响程度,将错误分为严重或轻微。结果软件引入后,完成度比例由4%提高到19% (P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving completeness & reducing errors in medical certification of cause of death: The impact of electronic mortality software in a tertiary care centre in South India.

Background & objectives Mortality statistics are crucial for understanding public health. Accurate medical certification of cause of death (MCCD) is essential for good mortality statistics. However, the quality of MCCD form-filling remains a concern. Based on the learnings from the ICMR-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (ICMR-NCDIR), e-Mortality software implementation project, our institute developed and used a new in-house mortality software for MCCD from January 2021. This study compared MCCD forms before and after implementation of the mortality software. Methods The study was conducted from March 2024 to July 2024 in the department of Medicine at a tertiary care teaching institute in Puducherry. We analysed 105 hand-written forms from the year 2020 and 105 software-generated forms from the year 2021, focusing on completeness, errors, and International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) compatibility. We checked 13 items for completeness. Errors were categorised as major or minor, depending on how they affected ICD-10 coding. Results The proportion of completeness improved from 4 to 19 per cent after software introduction (P<0.001). Minor errors significantly decreased from 96 to 81 per cent (P<0.002). About 88 per cent of hand-written forms had major errors, which was significantly reduced to 42 per cent in software-generated forms (P<0.001). Compatibility of the underlying cause of death for generating ICD-10 coding improved from 73 to 96 per cent (P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions The findings of this study suggest that our mortality software significantly improved completeness and modestly reduced errors. Other institutions may consider adopting an electronic format for MCCD to improve completeness and accuracy. We emphasise regular training of doctors and auditing of MCCD forms to further improve the quality of death certification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信