ffr引导下的多血管疾病PCI治疗:CABG疗效相近,还是疗效不足?

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pradeep Narayan
{"title":"ffr引导下的多血管疾病PCI治疗:CABG疗效相近,还是疗效不足?","authors":"Pradeep Narayan","doi":"10.1007/s12055-025-01973-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this review, we critically examine the 5-year outcomes of the Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease (FAME 3) trial. While the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction showed no significant difference between the two strategies at 5 years, percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with higher rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery demonstrated greater benefit in patients with more complex coronary lesions. These findings stress the need for cautious interpretation of the trial findings and emphasize the value of long-term follow-up in assessing meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13285,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"41 7","pages":"955-957"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FFR-guided PCI in multivessel disease: a close match, or an underpowered verdict on CABG?\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Narayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12055-025-01973-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this review, we critically examine the 5-year outcomes of the Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease (FAME 3) trial. While the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction showed no significant difference between the two strategies at 5 years, percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with higher rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery demonstrated greater benefit in patients with more complex coronary lesions. These findings stress the need for cautious interpretation of the trial findings and emphasize the value of long-term follow-up in assessing meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 7\",\"pages\":\"955-957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-01973-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-01973-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇综述中,我们严格审查了分流储备引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病(FAME 3)试验的5年结果。在5年时,死亡、中风或心肌梗死的综合结果在两种策略之间没有显着差异,但经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心肌梗死和重复血运重建率较高相关。冠状动脉旁路移植术在冠状动脉病变更复杂的患者中显示出更大的益处。这些发现强调了谨慎解释试验结果的必要性,并强调了长期随访在评估临床结果有意义差异方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FFR-guided PCI in multivessel disease: a close match, or an underpowered verdict on CABG?

In this review, we critically examine the 5-year outcomes of the Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease (FAME 3) trial. While the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction showed no significant difference between the two strategies at 5 years, percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with higher rates of myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery demonstrated greater benefit in patients with more complex coronary lesions. These findings stress the need for cautious interpretation of the trial findings and emphasize the value of long-term follow-up in assessing meaningful differences in clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
141
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is education. The journal aims to dissipate current clinical practices and developments in the area of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. This includes information on cardiovascular epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestation etc. The journal accepts manuscripts from cardiovascular anaesthesia, cardiothoracic and vascular nursing and technology development and new/innovative products.The journal is the official publication of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons which has a membership of over 1000 at present.DescriptionThe journal is the official organ of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons. It was started in 1982 by Dr. Solomon Victor and ws being published twice a year up to 1996. From 2000 the editorial office moved to Delhi. From 2001 the journal was extended to quarterly and subsequently four issues annually have been printed out at time and regularly without fail. The journal receives manuscripts from members and non-members and cardiovascular surgeons. The manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two or sometimes three or four reviewers who are on the panel. The manuscript process is now completely online. Funding the journal comes partially from the organization and from revenue generated by subscription and advertisement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信