在地方政府议程上提出复杂的公共卫生挑战:挪威案例研究。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kristine Løkås Vigsnes, Charlotte Kiland, Harry Rutter, Eirik Abildsnes
{"title":"在地方政府议程上提出复杂的公共卫生挑战:挪威案例研究。","authors":"Kristine Løkås Vigsnes, Charlotte Kiland, Harry Rutter, Eirik Abildsnes","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01347-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health challenges, ranging from noncommunicable disease prevention to pandemic preparedness, involve both policymaking and the handling of complexity at local, national or global level. The complexity of public health challenges arises from uncertain knowledge, hidden mechanisms, differing conceptual models and multiple stakeholders, making it difficult to identify and agree on problem definitions and potential solutions. This case study aims to provide insights into how complex public health challenges are addressed within local government agendas. We use theories of policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting to explore the processes behind the agenda setting of a public health programme for work inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an in-depth case study in a local government context. Data from interviews with key informants and political documents were triangulated and analysed using deductive thematic content analysis, framed within Kingdon's agenda-setting theory and theories of policy entrepreneurs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified problem framing, the involvement of multiple actors, and turbulent surroundings as influential factors for agenda setting of complex public health challenges in local government. We further identified the significance of the level of influence of policy entrepreneurs' positions, their coalitions and maintaining agenda control as core mechanisms for enabling agenda setting. We found that strategic manoeuvres of policy entrepreneurs were crucial to handle and manoeuvre complexity within the multiple streams described by Kingdon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article contributes knowledge of how complex public health problems receive attention and how these issues are shaped and defined, placed on governmental agendas, and paired with solutions. The article contributes important insights for understanding policy responses to complex public health problems and how policy entrepreneurs strategically manoeuvre within the streams of policy development to create windows of opportunity and maintain agenda control. This is important knowledge to support agenda setting for public health challenges and to realize policies to improve public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raising complex public health challenges on local government agendas: a Norwegian case study.\",\"authors\":\"Kristine Løkås Vigsnes, Charlotte Kiland, Harry Rutter, Eirik Abildsnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12961-025-01347-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health challenges, ranging from noncommunicable disease prevention to pandemic preparedness, involve both policymaking and the handling of complexity at local, national or global level. The complexity of public health challenges arises from uncertain knowledge, hidden mechanisms, differing conceptual models and multiple stakeholders, making it difficult to identify and agree on problem definitions and potential solutions. This case study aims to provide insights into how complex public health challenges are addressed within local government agendas. We use theories of policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting to explore the processes behind the agenda setting of a public health programme for work inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an in-depth case study in a local government context. Data from interviews with key informants and political documents were triangulated and analysed using deductive thematic content analysis, framed within Kingdon's agenda-setting theory and theories of policy entrepreneurs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified problem framing, the involvement of multiple actors, and turbulent surroundings as influential factors for agenda setting of complex public health challenges in local government. We further identified the significance of the level of influence of policy entrepreneurs' positions, their coalitions and maintaining agenda control as core mechanisms for enabling agenda setting. We found that strategic manoeuvres of policy entrepreneurs were crucial to handle and manoeuvre complexity within the multiple streams described by Kingdon.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article contributes knowledge of how complex public health problems receive attention and how these issues are shaped and defined, placed on governmental agendas, and paired with solutions. The article contributes important insights for understanding policy responses to complex public health problems and how policy entrepreneurs strategically manoeuvre within the streams of policy development to create windows of opportunity and maintain agenda control. This is important knowledge to support agenda setting for public health challenges and to realize policies to improve public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177986/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Research Policy and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01347-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01347-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:公共卫生挑战,从非传染性疾病预防到大流行防范,既涉及决策,也涉及在地方、国家或全球层面处理复杂性。公共卫生挑战的复杂性源于不确定的知识、隐藏的机制、不同的概念模型和多个利益攸关方,因此难以确定和商定问题的定义和可能的解决办法。本案例研究旨在深入了解如何在地方政府议程中解决复杂的公共卫生挑战。我们使用政策企业家和议程设置理论来探索公共卫生计划议程设置背后的过程,以促进工作包容。方法:我们在一个地方政府背景下进行了深入的案例研究。在金登的议程设置理论和政策企业家理论框架内,对采访关键线人和政治文件的数据进行了三角测量和分析,使用演绎主题内容分析。结果:我们确定了问题框架、多个参与者的参与和动荡的环境是影响地方政府复杂公共卫生挑战议程设置的因素。我们进一步确定了政策企业家的立场、他们的联盟和保持议程控制作为促成议程制定的核心机制的影响程度的重要性。我们发现,政策企业家的战略操作对于处理和操纵Kingdon所描述的多个流中的复杂性至关重要。结论:本文有助于了解复杂的公共卫生问题是如何受到关注的,以及这些问题是如何形成和定义的,如何列入政府议程,以及如何与解决方案相结合的。本文为理解对复杂公共卫生问题的政策反应以及政策企业家如何在政策制定流中进行战略操作以创造机会之窗并保持议程控制提供了重要见解。这是支持制定公共卫生挑战议程和落实改善公共卫生政策的重要知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Raising complex public health challenges on local government agendas: a Norwegian case study.

Background: Public health challenges, ranging from noncommunicable disease prevention to pandemic preparedness, involve both policymaking and the handling of complexity at local, national or global level. The complexity of public health challenges arises from uncertain knowledge, hidden mechanisms, differing conceptual models and multiple stakeholders, making it difficult to identify and agree on problem definitions and potential solutions. This case study aims to provide insights into how complex public health challenges are addressed within local government agendas. We use theories of policy entrepreneurs and agenda setting to explore the processes behind the agenda setting of a public health programme for work inclusion.

Methods: We conducted an in-depth case study in a local government context. Data from interviews with key informants and political documents were triangulated and analysed using deductive thematic content analysis, framed within Kingdon's agenda-setting theory and theories of policy entrepreneurs.

Results: We identified problem framing, the involvement of multiple actors, and turbulent surroundings as influential factors for agenda setting of complex public health challenges in local government. We further identified the significance of the level of influence of policy entrepreneurs' positions, their coalitions and maintaining agenda control as core mechanisms for enabling agenda setting. We found that strategic manoeuvres of policy entrepreneurs were crucial to handle and manoeuvre complexity within the multiple streams described by Kingdon.

Conclusions: This article contributes knowledge of how complex public health problems receive attention and how these issues are shaped and defined, placed on governmental agendas, and paired with solutions. The article contributes important insights for understanding policy responses to complex public health problems and how policy entrepreneurs strategically manoeuvre within the streams of policy development to create windows of opportunity and maintain agenda control. This is important knowledge to support agenda setting for public health challenges and to realize policies to improve public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信