{"title":"经济流行病学,病理人群,以及历史悠久的人口与健康调查。","authors":"John Nott","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2517786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the history of population health surveillance in modern Africa, considering the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) programme as a bridge between twentieth and twenty-first century epidemiology. Tracing this tradition of surveillance from pre-war Britain, through its extension into the British Empire, and its subsequent employment in post-colonial demography, this article makes two related arguments. The first, that surveys like the DHS complement and encourage economic logics in medicine. Focussing initially on questions of human capital, cross-sectional surveys have tended to promote and promise efficiency in terms of medical research and interventions, thereby reducing the need for extensive and expensive infrastructure. In Africa, this utility has meant that cross-sectional surveillance gained particular traction in the context of colonisation and again following the widespread implementation of Structural Adjustment Programmes from the early 1980s. The second argument takes that the collection of demographic and social data means that these surveys represent a unique form of surveillance medicine, one which encourages associations between illness, family, and society at large. Epidemiology drawn from these data promotes this pathologisation of population, binding the epistemology of contemporary Global Health to old ideas, and siting subaltern families and communities as a prime locus of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2517786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economical epidemiology, pathological populations, and the long history of the Demographic and Health Survey.\",\"authors\":\"John Nott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2025.2517786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines the history of population health surveillance in modern Africa, considering the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) programme as a bridge between twentieth and twenty-first century epidemiology. Tracing this tradition of surveillance from pre-war Britain, through its extension into the British Empire, and its subsequent employment in post-colonial demography, this article makes two related arguments. The first, that surveys like the DHS complement and encourage economic logics in medicine. Focussing initially on questions of human capital, cross-sectional surveys have tended to promote and promise efficiency in terms of medical research and interventions, thereby reducing the need for extensive and expensive infrastructure. In Africa, this utility has meant that cross-sectional surveillance gained particular traction in the context of colonisation and again following the widespread implementation of Structural Adjustment Programmes from the early 1980s. The second argument takes that the collection of demographic and social data means that these surveys represent a unique form of surveillance medicine, one which encourages associations between illness, family, and society at large. Epidemiology drawn from these data promotes this pathologisation of population, binding the epistemology of contemporary Global Health to old ideas, and siting subaltern families and communities as a prime locus of disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2517786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2517786\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2517786","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economical epidemiology, pathological populations, and the long history of the Demographic and Health Survey.
This article examines the history of population health surveillance in modern Africa, considering the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) programme as a bridge between twentieth and twenty-first century epidemiology. Tracing this tradition of surveillance from pre-war Britain, through its extension into the British Empire, and its subsequent employment in post-colonial demography, this article makes two related arguments. The first, that surveys like the DHS complement and encourage economic logics in medicine. Focussing initially on questions of human capital, cross-sectional surveys have tended to promote and promise efficiency in terms of medical research and interventions, thereby reducing the need for extensive and expensive infrastructure. In Africa, this utility has meant that cross-sectional surveillance gained particular traction in the context of colonisation and again following the widespread implementation of Structural Adjustment Programmes from the early 1980s. The second argument takes that the collection of demographic and social data means that these surveys represent a unique form of surveillance medicine, one which encourages associations between illness, family, and society at large. Epidemiology drawn from these data promotes this pathologisation of population, binding the epistemology of contemporary Global Health to old ideas, and siting subaltern families and communities as a prime locus of disease.
期刊介绍:
Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.