Weizhuo Chen, Zihui Xiong, Qiao Yang, Wenqi Xiao, Junyi Chen, Sisi Zhong, Ting Ye
{"title":"跨学科家庭医生团队成员提供综合护理的动机偏好:一项最佳-最差尺度研究。","authors":"Weizhuo Chen, Zihui Xiong, Qiao Yang, Wenqi Xiao, Junyi Chen, Sisi Zhong, Ting Ye","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, integrated care is facilitated by interdisciplinary Family Physician Teams (FPTs) to extend primary care services without increasing physician numbers. However, the advancement of integrated care faces challenges due to insufficient motivators for Family Physician Team Members (FPTMs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To elucidate the motivational preferences of FPTMs within integrated care, highlighting preference heterogeneity across individuals with diverse demographic and professional characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2022 with 363 FPTMs at community health centers affiliated with seven hospitals in Shenzhen city. The study assessed motivational preferences using a best-worst scaling (BWS) questionnaire to collect data. Conditional logit and mixed logit models were employed to analyze overall preferences and heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed a strong preference for patient-centered motivators, particularly highlighting patient needs, trust level, and adherence as key motivators that are crucial in shaping the engagement of FPTMs with integrated care. Additionally, heterogeneity in preference patterns was observed based on sex, education level, and professional role. Specifically, male FPTMs, those with a master's degree or higher, and general practitioners demonstrated a significantly stronger preference for employment benefits and government resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the preference of FPTMs for patient-level motivators, underscoring the importance of implementing a feedback mechanism to capture patients' perspectives on services. Policymakers are urged to develop tailored motivational structures that consider the varied preferences of team members across different roles, thereby motivating the provision of integrated care by FPTMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivational preferences of interdisciplinary family physician team members in delivering integrated care: a best-worst scaling study.\",\"authors\":\"Weizhuo Chen, Zihui Xiong, Qiao Yang, Wenqi Xiao, Junyi Chen, Sisi Zhong, Ting Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmaf016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In China, integrated care is facilitated by interdisciplinary Family Physician Teams (FPTs) to extend primary care services without increasing physician numbers. However, the advancement of integrated care faces challenges due to insufficient motivators for Family Physician Team Members (FPTMs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To elucidate the motivational preferences of FPTMs within integrated care, highlighting preference heterogeneity across individuals with diverse demographic and professional characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2022 with 363 FPTMs at community health centers affiliated with seven hospitals in Shenzhen city. The study assessed motivational preferences using a best-worst scaling (BWS) questionnaire to collect data. Conditional logit and mixed logit models were employed to analyze overall preferences and heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed a strong preference for patient-centered motivators, particularly highlighting patient needs, trust level, and adherence as key motivators that are crucial in shaping the engagement of FPTMs with integrated care. Additionally, heterogeneity in preference patterns was observed based on sex, education level, and professional role. Specifically, male FPTMs, those with a master's degree or higher, and general practitioners demonstrated a significantly stronger preference for employment benefits and government resource allocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the preference of FPTMs for patient-level motivators, underscoring the importance of implementing a feedback mechanism to capture patients' perspectives on services. Policymakers are urged to develop tailored motivational structures that consider the varied preferences of team members across different roles, thereby motivating the provision of integrated care by FPTMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Motivational preferences of interdisciplinary family physician team members in delivering integrated care: a best-worst scaling study.
Background: In China, integrated care is facilitated by interdisciplinary Family Physician Teams (FPTs) to extend primary care services without increasing physician numbers. However, the advancement of integrated care faces challenges due to insufficient motivators for Family Physician Team Members (FPTMs).
Objective: To elucidate the motivational preferences of FPTMs within integrated care, highlighting preference heterogeneity across individuals with diverse demographic and professional characteristics.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in November 2022 with 363 FPTMs at community health centers affiliated with seven hospitals in Shenzhen city. The study assessed motivational preferences using a best-worst scaling (BWS) questionnaire to collect data. Conditional logit and mixed logit models were employed to analyze overall preferences and heterogeneity.
Results: The study revealed a strong preference for patient-centered motivators, particularly highlighting patient needs, trust level, and adherence as key motivators that are crucial in shaping the engagement of FPTMs with integrated care. Additionally, heterogeneity in preference patterns was observed based on sex, education level, and professional role. Specifically, male FPTMs, those with a master's degree or higher, and general practitioners demonstrated a significantly stronger preference for employment benefits and government resource allocation.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the preference of FPTMs for patient-level motivators, underscoring the importance of implementing a feedback mechanism to capture patients' perspectives on services. Policymakers are urged to develop tailored motivational structures that consider the varied preferences of team members across different roles, thereby motivating the provision of integrated care by FPTMs.
期刊介绍:
Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries.
Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration.
The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.