儿童和青少年抗抑郁药随机双盲临床试验中安慰剂反应与效应大小的关联:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Risa Okubo, Kazuhiro Matsui, Mamoru Narukawa
{"title":"儿童和青少年抗抑郁药随机双盲临床试验中安慰剂反应与效应大小的关联:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Risa Okubo, Kazuhiro Matsui, Mamoru Narukawa","doi":"10.1007/s40261-025-01451-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of antidepressants in children and adolescents have failed to demonstrate their efficacy. This study examined the association between the placebo response and effect size in RCTs of antidepressants in children and adolescents assessed using the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents. The outcome for the present study was the mean change in the CDRS-R total score from baseline to the primary assessment time-point for the placebo and active drug arm. The effect size was calculated using Hedges' g.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 21 RCTs. There was a correlation between larger effect size and smaller placebo response. In clinical trials with fluoxetine, effect sizes were significantly greater in those with a placebo lead-in period than in those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The difference between the active drug and placebo was maximized when the placebo response was reduced. The placebo lead-in period was an important factor for obtaining superior results in clinical trials of antidepressants in adolescents and children evaluated using the CDRS-R.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Placebo Response with Effect Size in Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials of Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Risa Okubo, Kazuhiro Matsui, Mamoru Narukawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40261-025-01451-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of antidepressants in children and adolescents have failed to demonstrate their efficacy. This study examined the association between the placebo response and effect size in RCTs of antidepressants in children and adolescents assessed using the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents. The outcome for the present study was the mean change in the CDRS-R total score from baseline to the primary assessment time-point for the placebo and active drug arm. The effect size was calculated using Hedges' g.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 21 RCTs. There was a correlation between larger effect size and smaller placebo response. In clinical trials with fluoxetine, effect sizes were significantly greater in those with a placebo lead-in period than in those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The difference between the active drug and placebo was maximized when the placebo response was reduced. The placebo lead-in period was an important factor for obtaining superior results in clinical trials of antidepressants in adolescents and children evaluated using the CDRS-R.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-025-01451-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-025-01451-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:许多儿童和青少年抗抑郁药的随机临床试验(rct)未能证明其疗效。本研究采用儿童抑郁评定量表(CDRS-R)对儿童和青少年抗抑郁药物的随机对照试验进行评估,探讨安慰剂反应与效应大小之间的关系。方法:检索PubMed和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的抗抑郁药用于儿童和青少年重度抑郁症急性治疗的试验。本研究的结果是安慰剂组和活性药物组从基线到主要评估时间点的CDRS-R总分的平均变化。效应量采用Hedges' g计算。结果:分析包括21个随机对照试验。更大的效应量和更小的安慰剂反应之间存在相关性。在氟西汀的临床试验中,安慰剂引入期的效果显著大于没有引入期的效果。结论:当安慰剂反应降低时,活性药物与安慰剂的差异最大。在使用CDRS-R评估的青少年和儿童抗抑郁药物临床试验中,安慰剂引入期是获得优异结果的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Placebo Response with Effect Size in Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials of Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background and objective: Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of antidepressants in children and adolescents have failed to demonstrate their efficacy. This study examined the association between the placebo response and effect size in RCTs of antidepressants in children and adolescents assessed using the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R).

Methods: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents. The outcome for the present study was the mean change in the CDRS-R total score from baseline to the primary assessment time-point for the placebo and active drug arm. The effect size was calculated using Hedges' g.

Results: The analysis included 21 RCTs. There was a correlation between larger effect size and smaller placebo response. In clinical trials with fluoxetine, effect sizes were significantly greater in those with a placebo lead-in period than in those without.

Conclusions: The difference between the active drug and placebo was maximized when the placebo response was reduced. The placebo lead-in period was an important factor for obtaining superior results in clinical trials of antidepressants in adolescents and children evaluated using the CDRS-R.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信