“只是更清楚地了解我是谁”:法律改革后新西兰奥特罗阿LGBTQIA+人群在堕胎护理方面的经历。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
George Parker, Suzanne Miller, Sally Baddock, Elizabeth Kerekere, Chelsea D'Cruz
{"title":"“只是更清楚地了解我是谁”:法律改革后新西兰奥特罗阿LGBTQIA+人群在堕胎护理方面的经历。","authors":"George Parker, Suzanne Miller, Sally Baddock, Elizabeth Kerekere, Chelsea D'Cruz","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2025.2520293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH) is recognised internationally as a human right, but inequities exist in both access to, and outcomes from, SRH in some populations. LGBTQIA+ people accessing abortion services can have harmful experiences related to embedded norms that construct abortion care as being for cisgender heterosexual women. In Aotearoa New Zealand, legislative reform has decriminalised and liberalised abortion care to improve access and reduce outcome inequities. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten LGBTQIA+ abortion service users, aiming to understand from them what constitutes safe and accessible abortion care, and to examine how well newly reformed abortion services are serving this community. Our reflexive thematic analysis informed by the transformative paradigm identified three themes: navigating a double stigma to access abortion; invisibility as epistemic harm in abortion care; self-determining the abortion pathway as antidote. Findings demonstrated aspects of abortion services that were working well for LGBTQIA+ people, as well as harms resulting from gender and sexuality norms embedded in services that erase LGBTQIA+ people as service users. To meet LGBTQIA+ people's needs, abortion services should continue to offer flexible and multiple pathways into and through care but also need to develop strategies to address cis-heteronormativities across all service levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>'</i>Just get a clearer idea of who I am<i>'</i>: LGBTQIA+ people's experiences of abortion care in Aotearoa New Zealand following law reform.\",\"authors\":\"George Parker, Suzanne Miller, Sally Baddock, Elizabeth Kerekere, Chelsea D'Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691058.2025.2520293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH) is recognised internationally as a human right, but inequities exist in both access to, and outcomes from, SRH in some populations. LGBTQIA+ people accessing abortion services can have harmful experiences related to embedded norms that construct abortion care as being for cisgender heterosexual women. In Aotearoa New Zealand, legislative reform has decriminalised and liberalised abortion care to improve access and reduce outcome inequities. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten LGBTQIA+ abortion service users, aiming to understand from them what constitutes safe and accessible abortion care, and to examine how well newly reformed abortion services are serving this community. Our reflexive thematic analysis informed by the transformative paradigm identified three themes: navigating a double stigma to access abortion; invisibility as epistemic harm in abortion care; self-determining the abortion pathway as antidote. Findings demonstrated aspects of abortion services that were working well for LGBTQIA+ people, as well as harms resulting from gender and sexuality norms embedded in services that erase LGBTQIA+ people as service users. To meet LGBTQIA+ people's needs, abortion services should continue to offer flexible and multiple pathways into and through care but also need to develop strategies to address cis-heteronormativities across all service levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture, Health & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2520293\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2025.2520293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性健康和生殖健康在国际上被公认为一项人权,但在某些人群中,性健康和生殖健康的获取和结果都存在不平等。获得堕胎服务的LGBTQIA+人群可能会有与将堕胎护理构建为顺性异性恋女性的嵌入式规范相关的有害经历。在新西兰,立法改革使堕胎护理非刑事化和自由化,以改善获得机会并减少结果不平等。我们对10名LGBTQIA+堕胎服务用户进行了半结构化访谈,旨在从他们那里了解什么是安全和可获得的堕胎护理,并检查新改革的堕胎服务如何为这个社区服务。通过变革范式,我们的反思性专题分析确定了三个主题:在获得堕胎的双重耻辱中导航;流产护理中的隐性认知伤害自行决定流产途径作为解药。调查结果表明,堕胎服务的某些方面对LGBTQIA+人群很有效,但服务中嵌入的性别和性规范却会抹杀LGBTQIA+人群作为服务使用者的身份,从而造成伤害。为了满足LGBTQIA+人群的需求,堕胎服务应该继续提供灵活多样的途径,让他们进入和通过护理,但也需要制定策略,解决所有服务级别的顺式异性恋问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Just get a clearer idea of who I am': LGBTQIA+ people's experiences of abortion care in Aotearoa New Zealand following law reform.

Sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRH) is recognised internationally as a human right, but inequities exist in both access to, and outcomes from, SRH in some populations. LGBTQIA+ people accessing abortion services can have harmful experiences related to embedded norms that construct abortion care as being for cisgender heterosexual women. In Aotearoa New Zealand, legislative reform has decriminalised and liberalised abortion care to improve access and reduce outcome inequities. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten LGBTQIA+ abortion service users, aiming to understand from them what constitutes safe and accessible abortion care, and to examine how well newly reformed abortion services are serving this community. Our reflexive thematic analysis informed by the transformative paradigm identified three themes: navigating a double stigma to access abortion; invisibility as epistemic harm in abortion care; self-determining the abortion pathway as antidote. Findings demonstrated aspects of abortion services that were working well for LGBTQIA+ people, as well as harms resulting from gender and sexuality norms embedded in services that erase LGBTQIA+ people as service users. To meet LGBTQIA+ people's needs, abortion services should continue to offer flexible and multiple pathways into and through care but also need to develop strategies to address cis-heteronormativities across all service levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信