对卫生保健工作者群体中一氧化二氮的使用情况及其对环境影响的了解的调查。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Emily R Balmaks, Richard Seglenieks, Tanita Botha, Forbes McGain
{"title":"对卫生保健工作者群体中一氧化二氮的使用情况及其对环境影响的了解的调查。","authors":"Emily R Balmaks, Richard Seglenieks, Tanita Botha, Forbes McGain","doi":"10.1177/0310057X251330318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a greenhouse gas that is a significant contributor to the carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of health services. We aimed to obtain information about N<sub>2</sub>O usage and knowledge of its environmental effects among clinical staff at an Australian metropolitan public health network. We distributed an anonymised survey to doctors, nurses and midwives working in anaesthesia, birthing, adult and paediatric emergency medicine, and paediatrics. We analysed 403 of 1320 (31%) responses; 117 of 198 (59%) from anaesthesia, 102 of 368 (27%) from birthing, 137 of 643 (21%) from adult and paediatric emergency medicine and 40 of 111 (36%) from paediatrics. Descriptive statistics were used, and statistical analyses performed on questions regarding environmental knowledge. Of those who currently used N<sub>2</sub>O, the majority indicated there were alternative therapies (184/239, 77%), which they would (137/239, 57%) or could (90/239, 38%) be willing to use. Approximately half (219/385, 57%) of respondents correctly identified N<sub>2</sub>O as a greenhouse gas, but only 70/382 (18%) identified its global warming potential as hundreds of times that of carbon dioxide. Almost half (180/383, 47%) answered that N<sub>2</sub>O is ozone depleting. For anaesthetists, 96% (45/47) knew that N<sub>2</sub>O was a greenhouse gas, compared with 41% (32/79) of midwives. This survey demonstrated that frequency of use and reason for use of N<sub>2</sub>O varies between clinical groups, and that a significant proportion of staff that use N<sub>2</sub>O do not know its harmful environmental characteristics. Our results provide data to inform future research on interventions to minimise clinical use of N<sub>2</sub>O, and suggest that educational programs should form part of these efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"310057X251330318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of nitrous oxide usage and knowledge of its environmental effects across healthcare worker groups.\",\"authors\":\"Emily R Balmaks, Richard Seglenieks, Tanita Botha, Forbes McGain\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0310057X251330318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a greenhouse gas that is a significant contributor to the carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of health services. We aimed to obtain information about N<sub>2</sub>O usage and knowledge of its environmental effects among clinical staff at an Australian metropolitan public health network. We distributed an anonymised survey to doctors, nurses and midwives working in anaesthesia, birthing, adult and paediatric emergency medicine, and paediatrics. We analysed 403 of 1320 (31%) responses; 117 of 198 (59%) from anaesthesia, 102 of 368 (27%) from birthing, 137 of 643 (21%) from adult and paediatric emergency medicine and 40 of 111 (36%) from paediatrics. Descriptive statistics were used, and statistical analyses performed on questions regarding environmental knowledge. Of those who currently used N<sub>2</sub>O, the majority indicated there were alternative therapies (184/239, 77%), which they would (137/239, 57%) or could (90/239, 38%) be willing to use. Approximately half (219/385, 57%) of respondents correctly identified N<sub>2</sub>O as a greenhouse gas, but only 70/382 (18%) identified its global warming potential as hundreds of times that of carbon dioxide. Almost half (180/383, 47%) answered that N<sub>2</sub>O is ozone depleting. For anaesthetists, 96% (45/47) knew that N<sub>2</sub>O was a greenhouse gas, compared with 41% (32/79) of midwives. This survey demonstrated that frequency of use and reason for use of N<sub>2</sub>O varies between clinical groups, and that a significant proportion of staff that use N<sub>2</sub>O do not know its harmful environmental characteristics. Our results provide data to inform future research on interventions to minimise clinical use of N<sub>2</sub>O, and suggest that educational programs should form part of these efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"310057X251330318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X251330318\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X251330318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一氧化二氮(N2O)是一种温室气体,是卫生服务二氧化碳当量排放的重要来源。我们的目的是获得有关N2O的使用信息及其对澳大利亚大都市公共卫生网络临床工作人员的环境影响的知识。我们向在麻醉、分娩、成人和儿科急诊医学以及儿科工作的医生、护士和助产士分发了一份匿名调查。我们分析了1320份回复中的403份(31%);198人中有117人(59%)来自麻醉,368人中有102人(27%)来自分娩,643人中有137人(21%)来自成人和儿科急诊医学,111人中有40人(36%)来自儿科。使用描述性统计,并对有关环境知识的问题进行统计分析。在目前使用N2O的患者中,大多数人表示有替代疗法(184/239,77%),他们将(137/239,57%)或可以(90/239,38%)愿意使用。大约一半(219/385,57%)的受访者正确地认为一氧化二氮是一种温室气体,但只有70/382(18%)的受访者认为其全球变暖潜力是二氧化碳的数百倍。近一半(180/383,47%)的人回答说N2O会破坏臭氧层。96%的麻醉师(45/47)知道N2O是一种温室气体,而助产士的这一比例为41%(32/79)。本调查显示,N2O的使用频率和使用原因在不同临床组之间存在差异,并且使用N2O的工作人员中有相当大比例不知道其有害环境特征。我们的研究结果为未来的干预研究提供了数据,以尽量减少临床使用N2O,并建议教育计划应成为这些努力的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of nitrous oxide usage and knowledge of its environmental effects across healthcare worker groups.

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that is a significant contributor to the carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of health services. We aimed to obtain information about N2O usage and knowledge of its environmental effects among clinical staff at an Australian metropolitan public health network. We distributed an anonymised survey to doctors, nurses and midwives working in anaesthesia, birthing, adult and paediatric emergency medicine, and paediatrics. We analysed 403 of 1320 (31%) responses; 117 of 198 (59%) from anaesthesia, 102 of 368 (27%) from birthing, 137 of 643 (21%) from adult and paediatric emergency medicine and 40 of 111 (36%) from paediatrics. Descriptive statistics were used, and statistical analyses performed on questions regarding environmental knowledge. Of those who currently used N2O, the majority indicated there were alternative therapies (184/239, 77%), which they would (137/239, 57%) or could (90/239, 38%) be willing to use. Approximately half (219/385, 57%) of respondents correctly identified N2O as a greenhouse gas, but only 70/382 (18%) identified its global warming potential as hundreds of times that of carbon dioxide. Almost half (180/383, 47%) answered that N2O is ozone depleting. For anaesthetists, 96% (45/47) knew that N2O was a greenhouse gas, compared with 41% (32/79) of midwives. This survey demonstrated that frequency of use and reason for use of N2O varies between clinical groups, and that a significant proportion of staff that use N2O do not know its harmful environmental characteristics. Our results provide data to inform future research on interventions to minimise clinical use of N2O, and suggest that educational programs should form part of these efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信