Emily R Balmaks, Richard Seglenieks, Tanita Botha, Forbes McGain
{"title":"对卫生保健工作者群体中一氧化二氮的使用情况及其对环境影响的了解的调查。","authors":"Emily R Balmaks, Richard Seglenieks, Tanita Botha, Forbes McGain","doi":"10.1177/0310057X251330318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a greenhouse gas that is a significant contributor to the carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of health services. We aimed to obtain information about N<sub>2</sub>O usage and knowledge of its environmental effects among clinical staff at an Australian metropolitan public health network. We distributed an anonymised survey to doctors, nurses and midwives working in anaesthesia, birthing, adult and paediatric emergency medicine, and paediatrics. We analysed 403 of 1320 (31%) responses; 117 of 198 (59%) from anaesthesia, 102 of 368 (27%) from birthing, 137 of 643 (21%) from adult and paediatric emergency medicine and 40 of 111 (36%) from paediatrics. Descriptive statistics were used, and statistical analyses performed on questions regarding environmental knowledge. Of those who currently used N<sub>2</sub>O, the majority indicated there were alternative therapies (184/239, 77%), which they would (137/239, 57%) or could (90/239, 38%) be willing to use. Approximately half (219/385, 57%) of respondents correctly identified N<sub>2</sub>O as a greenhouse gas, but only 70/382 (18%) identified its global warming potential as hundreds of times that of carbon dioxide. Almost half (180/383, 47%) answered that N<sub>2</sub>O is ozone depleting. For anaesthetists, 96% (45/47) knew that N<sub>2</sub>O was a greenhouse gas, compared with 41% (32/79) of midwives. This survey demonstrated that frequency of use and reason for use of N<sub>2</sub>O varies between clinical groups, and that a significant proportion of staff that use N<sub>2</sub>O do not know its harmful environmental characteristics. Our results provide data to inform future research on interventions to minimise clinical use of N<sub>2</sub>O, and suggest that educational programs should form part of these efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"310057X251330318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of nitrous oxide usage and knowledge of its environmental effects across healthcare worker groups.\",\"authors\":\"Emily R Balmaks, Richard Seglenieks, Tanita Botha, Forbes McGain\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0310057X251330318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) is a greenhouse gas that is a significant contributor to the carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of health services. We aimed to obtain information about N<sub>2</sub>O usage and knowledge of its environmental effects among clinical staff at an Australian metropolitan public health network. We distributed an anonymised survey to doctors, nurses and midwives working in anaesthesia, birthing, adult and paediatric emergency medicine, and paediatrics. We analysed 403 of 1320 (31%) responses; 117 of 198 (59%) from anaesthesia, 102 of 368 (27%) from birthing, 137 of 643 (21%) from adult and paediatric emergency medicine and 40 of 111 (36%) from paediatrics. Descriptive statistics were used, and statistical analyses performed on questions regarding environmental knowledge. Of those who currently used N<sub>2</sub>O, the majority indicated there were alternative therapies (184/239, 77%), which they would (137/239, 57%) or could (90/239, 38%) be willing to use. Approximately half (219/385, 57%) of respondents correctly identified N<sub>2</sub>O as a greenhouse gas, but only 70/382 (18%) identified its global warming potential as hundreds of times that of carbon dioxide. Almost half (180/383, 47%) answered that N<sub>2</sub>O is ozone depleting. For anaesthetists, 96% (45/47) knew that N<sub>2</sub>O was a greenhouse gas, compared with 41% (32/79) of midwives. This survey demonstrated that frequency of use and reason for use of N<sub>2</sub>O varies between clinical groups, and that a significant proportion of staff that use N<sub>2</sub>O do not know its harmful environmental characteristics. Our results provide data to inform future research on interventions to minimise clinical use of N<sub>2</sub>O, and suggest that educational programs should form part of these efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"310057X251330318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X251330318\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X251330318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A survey of nitrous oxide usage and knowledge of its environmental effects across healthcare worker groups.
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that is a significant contributor to the carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of health services. We aimed to obtain information about N2O usage and knowledge of its environmental effects among clinical staff at an Australian metropolitan public health network. We distributed an anonymised survey to doctors, nurses and midwives working in anaesthesia, birthing, adult and paediatric emergency medicine, and paediatrics. We analysed 403 of 1320 (31%) responses; 117 of 198 (59%) from anaesthesia, 102 of 368 (27%) from birthing, 137 of 643 (21%) from adult and paediatric emergency medicine and 40 of 111 (36%) from paediatrics. Descriptive statistics were used, and statistical analyses performed on questions regarding environmental knowledge. Of those who currently used N2O, the majority indicated there were alternative therapies (184/239, 77%), which they would (137/239, 57%) or could (90/239, 38%) be willing to use. Approximately half (219/385, 57%) of respondents correctly identified N2O as a greenhouse gas, but only 70/382 (18%) identified its global warming potential as hundreds of times that of carbon dioxide. Almost half (180/383, 47%) answered that N2O is ozone depleting. For anaesthetists, 96% (45/47) knew that N2O was a greenhouse gas, compared with 41% (32/79) of midwives. This survey demonstrated that frequency of use and reason for use of N2O varies between clinical groups, and that a significant proportion of staff that use N2O do not know its harmful environmental characteristics. Our results provide data to inform future research on interventions to minimise clinical use of N2O, and suggest that educational programs should form part of these efforts.
期刊介绍:
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.