Tirna Purkait, Dipti A Dev, Natalie Koziol, Jaclyn A Saltzman, Jasmin Smith, Lisa Franzen-Castle
{"title":"参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的城乡差异和挑战","authors":"Tirna Purkait, Dipti A Dev, Natalie Koziol, Jaclyn A Saltzman, Jasmin Smith, Lisa Franzen-Castle","doi":"10.1177/08901171251352703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis research investigates the perceived benefits and challenges of participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among households with young children across urban and rural Nebraska, aiming to address the limited exploration of disparities in its reach.DesignCross-Sectional (SNAP-Ed Needs and Assets Assessment).SettingHouseholds across Nebraska.ParticipantsLow-income families with at least 1 child aged 6 or younger (n = 1040).MeasuresPerceived benefits and challenges to SNAP participation across urban-rural populations, controlling for race, income, and education.AnalysisChi-square tests and logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.ResultsOverall, financial need was perceived as the top reported benefit, while time and efforts for recertification were the top challenge. Rural residents perceived financial need (<i>P</i> < 001) and ability to have enough healthy food (<i>P</i> < 05) as major drivers for SNAP enrollment, whereas urban residents perceived previous SNAP-Ed participation (<i>P</i> < 001) and positive peer influence (<i>P</i> < 01) as benefits. Rural respondents perceived greater challenges in SNAP application requiring more time and effort (<i>P</i> < 001), while urban respondents had significantly higher concerns about native language accessibility (<i>P</i> < 001), poor customer service (<i>P</i> < 05), and unwillingness to depend on government agencies (<i>P</i> < 05).ConclusionGeographically and culturally tailored SNAP-Ed interventions and streamlined application processes are required to address the urban-rural disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251352703"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban-Rural Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participation.\",\"authors\":\"Tirna Purkait, Dipti A Dev, Natalie Koziol, Jaclyn A Saltzman, Jasmin Smith, Lisa Franzen-Castle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171251352703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeThis research investigates the perceived benefits and challenges of participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among households with young children across urban and rural Nebraska, aiming to address the limited exploration of disparities in its reach.DesignCross-Sectional (SNAP-Ed Needs and Assets Assessment).SettingHouseholds across Nebraska.ParticipantsLow-income families with at least 1 child aged 6 or younger (n = 1040).MeasuresPerceived benefits and challenges to SNAP participation across urban-rural populations, controlling for race, income, and education.AnalysisChi-square tests and logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.ResultsOverall, financial need was perceived as the top reported benefit, while time and efforts for recertification were the top challenge. Rural residents perceived financial need (<i>P</i> < 001) and ability to have enough healthy food (<i>P</i> < 05) as major drivers for SNAP enrollment, whereas urban residents perceived previous SNAP-Ed participation (<i>P</i> < 001) and positive peer influence (<i>P</i> < 01) as benefits. Rural respondents perceived greater challenges in SNAP application requiring more time and effort (<i>P</i> < 001), while urban respondents had significantly higher concerns about native language accessibility (<i>P</i> < 001), poor customer service (<i>P</i> < 05), and unwillingness to depend on government agencies (<i>P</i> < 05).ConclusionGeographically and culturally tailored SNAP-Ed interventions and streamlined application processes are required to address the urban-rural disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171251352703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251352703\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251352703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Urban-Rural Disparities in Perceived Benefits and Challenges for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participation.
PurposeThis research investigates the perceived benefits and challenges of participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) among households with young children across urban and rural Nebraska, aiming to address the limited exploration of disparities in its reach.DesignCross-Sectional (SNAP-Ed Needs and Assets Assessment).SettingHouseholds across Nebraska.ParticipantsLow-income families with at least 1 child aged 6 or younger (n = 1040).MeasuresPerceived benefits and challenges to SNAP participation across urban-rural populations, controlling for race, income, and education.AnalysisChi-square tests and logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg correction.ResultsOverall, financial need was perceived as the top reported benefit, while time and efforts for recertification were the top challenge. Rural residents perceived financial need (P < 001) and ability to have enough healthy food (P < 05) as major drivers for SNAP enrollment, whereas urban residents perceived previous SNAP-Ed participation (P < 001) and positive peer influence (P < 01) as benefits. Rural respondents perceived greater challenges in SNAP application requiring more time and effort (P < 001), while urban respondents had significantly higher concerns about native language accessibility (P < 001), poor customer service (P < 05), and unwillingness to depend on government agencies (P < 05).ConclusionGeographically and culturally tailored SNAP-Ed interventions and streamlined application processes are required to address the urban-rural disparities.
期刊介绍:
The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.