Anette B Christensen, Christine IIkjær, Torben K Laustrup, Esben Sejer, Camilla Rønnøw, Kaj V Døssing, Troels B Jensen, Jacob K Andersen, Christoffer G Sølling
{"title":"超声引导神经阻滞提高Colles骨折闭合复位成功率:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Anette B Christensen, Christine IIkjær, Torben K Laustrup, Esben Sejer, Camilla Rønnøw, Kaj V Døssing, Troels B Jensen, Jacob K Andersen, Christoffer G Sølling","doi":"10.1111/aas.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The initial treatment for distal forearm fractures, including Colles' fractures, involves closed reduction, for which effective pain management is essential. In Colles' fractures, achieving a satisfactory closed reduction may eliminate the need for surgical intervention. While ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are effective, hematoma blocks (HB) are often favored due to their feasibility in the emergency care setting. Further research comparing treatment outcomes is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicentre randomised controlled trial, adults with distal forearm fractures were assigned to either ultrasound-guided blocks of the radial and median nerves (US) or HB for closed fracture reduction. The primary endpoint was satisfactory fracture reduction. Secondary endpoints were secondary fracture dislocation, self-reported pain, and time spent in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 238 patients with Colles' fracture, 117 received US and 121 received HB. Satisfactory fracture reduction was achieved in 73 (62%) and 49 (40%) patients, respectively (p = 0.01). Surgical correction was conducted in 61 (52%) patients in the US group, contrasting 80 (66%) patients in the HB group (p = 0.03). During the fracture reduction, no difference in self-reported pain was observed (p = 0.21) for patients with distal forearm fractures (n = 247). The median time from block application to fracture reduction was 45 min in the US group and 25 min in the HB group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided median and radial nerve blocks had a higher success rate for Colles' fracture reduction than the hematoma block group. The influence of anesthetic techniques on the eventual need for surgery requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 6","pages":"e70063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks Improve Success Rate of Closed Reduction of Colles' Fractures: A Randomised Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anette B Christensen, Christine IIkjær, Torben K Laustrup, Esben Sejer, Camilla Rønnøw, Kaj V Døssing, Troels B Jensen, Jacob K Andersen, Christoffer G Sølling\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.70063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The initial treatment for distal forearm fractures, including Colles' fractures, involves closed reduction, for which effective pain management is essential. In Colles' fractures, achieving a satisfactory closed reduction may eliminate the need for surgical intervention. While ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are effective, hematoma blocks (HB) are often favored due to their feasibility in the emergency care setting. Further research comparing treatment outcomes is warranted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicentre randomised controlled trial, adults with distal forearm fractures were assigned to either ultrasound-guided blocks of the radial and median nerves (US) or HB for closed fracture reduction. The primary endpoint was satisfactory fracture reduction. Secondary endpoints were secondary fracture dislocation, self-reported pain, and time spent in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 238 patients with Colles' fracture, 117 received US and 121 received HB. Satisfactory fracture reduction was achieved in 73 (62%) and 49 (40%) patients, respectively (p = 0.01). Surgical correction was conducted in 61 (52%) patients in the US group, contrasting 80 (66%) patients in the HB group (p = 0.03). During the fracture reduction, no difference in self-reported pain was observed (p = 0.21) for patients with distal forearm fractures (n = 247). The median time from block application to fracture reduction was 45 min in the US group and 25 min in the HB group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided median and radial nerve blocks had a higher success rate for Colles' fracture reduction than the hematoma block group. The influence of anesthetic techniques on the eventual need for surgery requires further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 6\",\"pages\":\"e70063\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks Improve Success Rate of Closed Reduction of Colles' Fractures: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Background: The initial treatment for distal forearm fractures, including Colles' fractures, involves closed reduction, for which effective pain management is essential. In Colles' fractures, achieving a satisfactory closed reduction may eliminate the need for surgical intervention. While ultrasound-guided nerve blocks are effective, hematoma blocks (HB) are often favored due to their feasibility in the emergency care setting. Further research comparing treatment outcomes is warranted.
Methods: In a multicentre randomised controlled trial, adults with distal forearm fractures were assigned to either ultrasound-guided blocks of the radial and median nerves (US) or HB for closed fracture reduction. The primary endpoint was satisfactory fracture reduction. Secondary endpoints were secondary fracture dislocation, self-reported pain, and time spent in the emergency department.
Results: Among 238 patients with Colles' fracture, 117 received US and 121 received HB. Satisfactory fracture reduction was achieved in 73 (62%) and 49 (40%) patients, respectively (p = 0.01). Surgical correction was conducted in 61 (52%) patients in the US group, contrasting 80 (66%) patients in the HB group (p = 0.03). During the fracture reduction, no difference in self-reported pain was observed (p = 0.21) for patients with distal forearm fractures (n = 247). The median time from block application to fracture reduction was 45 min in the US group and 25 min in the HB group (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided median and radial nerve blocks had a higher success rate for Colles' fracture reduction than the hematoma block group. The influence of anesthetic techniques on the eventual need for surgery requires further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.