科学-政策界面的知识掮客:来自生物安全和环境管理的见解。

IF 5.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ambio Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s13280-025-02208-7
Alejandro Bortolus, Chad L Hewitt, Veli Mitova, Evangelina Schwindt, Temitope O Sogbanmu, Emelda E Chukwu, Remco Heesen, Ricardo Kaufer, Hannah Rubin, Mike D Schneider, Anne Schwenkenbecher, Helena Slanickova, Katie Woolaston, Li-An Yu
{"title":"科学-政策界面的知识掮客:来自生物安全和环境管理的见解。","authors":"Alejandro Bortolus, Chad L Hewitt, Veli Mitova, Evangelina Schwindt, Temitope O Sogbanmu, Emelda E Chukwu, Remco Heesen, Ricardo Kaufer, Hannah Rubin, Mike D Schneider, Anne Schwenkenbecher, Helena Slanickova, Katie Woolaston, Li-An Yu","doi":"10.1007/s13280-025-02208-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Determining appropriate mechanisms for transferring and translating research into policy has become a major concern for researchers (knowledge producers) and policymakers (knowledge users) worldwide. This has led to the emergence of a new function of brokering between researchers and policymakers, and a new type of agent called Knowledge Broker. Understanding these complex multi-agent interactions is critical for an efficient knowledge brokering practice during any given policymaking process. Here, we present (1) the current diversity of knowledge broker groups working in the field of biosecurity and environmental management; (2) the incentives linking the different agents involved in the process (knowledge producers, knowledge brokers and knowledge users); and (3) the gaps, needs and challenges to better understand this social ecosystem. We also propose alternatives aimed at improving transparency and efficiency, including future scenarios where the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies may become predominant in knowledge-brokering activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge brokers at the science-policy interface: Insights from biosecurity and environmental management.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Bortolus, Chad L Hewitt, Veli Mitova, Evangelina Schwindt, Temitope O Sogbanmu, Emelda E Chukwu, Remco Heesen, Ricardo Kaufer, Hannah Rubin, Mike D Schneider, Anne Schwenkenbecher, Helena Slanickova, Katie Woolaston, Li-An Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13280-025-02208-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Determining appropriate mechanisms for transferring and translating research into policy has become a major concern for researchers (knowledge producers) and policymakers (knowledge users) worldwide. This has led to the emergence of a new function of brokering between researchers and policymakers, and a new type of agent called Knowledge Broker. Understanding these complex multi-agent interactions is critical for an efficient knowledge brokering practice during any given policymaking process. Here, we present (1) the current diversity of knowledge broker groups working in the field of biosecurity and environmental management; (2) the incentives linking the different agents involved in the process (knowledge producers, knowledge brokers and knowledge users); and (3) the gaps, needs and challenges to better understand this social ecosystem. We also propose alternatives aimed at improving transparency and efficiency, including future scenarios where the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies may become predominant in knowledge-brokering activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambio\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02208-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02208-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定将研究转化为政策的适当机制已成为全世界研究人员(知识生产者)和决策者(知识使用者)的主要关切。这导致研究人员和政策制定者之间出现了一种新的中介功能,以及一种被称为知识经纪人的新型代理人。在任何给定的政策制定过程中,理解这些复杂的多代理相互作用对于有效的知识代理实践至关重要。在此,我们提出(1)目前在生物安全和环境管理领域工作的知识经纪人群体的多样性;(2)连接知识生产过程中不同主体(知识生产者、知识经纪人和知识使用者)的激励机制;(3)更好地了解这一社会生态系统的差距、需求和挑战。我们还提出了旨在提高透明度和效率的替代方案,包括人工智能(AI)技术的作用可能在知识中介活动中占主导地位的未来情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge brokers at the science-policy interface: Insights from biosecurity and environmental management.

Determining appropriate mechanisms for transferring and translating research into policy has become a major concern for researchers (knowledge producers) and policymakers (knowledge users) worldwide. This has led to the emergence of a new function of brokering between researchers and policymakers, and a new type of agent called Knowledge Broker. Understanding these complex multi-agent interactions is critical for an efficient knowledge brokering practice during any given policymaking process. Here, we present (1) the current diversity of knowledge broker groups working in the field of biosecurity and environmental management; (2) the incentives linking the different agents involved in the process (knowledge producers, knowledge brokers and knowledge users); and (3) the gaps, needs and challenges to better understand this social ecosystem. We also propose alternatives aimed at improving transparency and efficiency, including future scenarios where the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies may become predominant in knowledge-brokering activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信