Yan Ma MD , Hai-Yang Chen MD , Fu-Jing Huang MD , Xiao-Lin Pang MD , Jian Zheng MD , Fang He MD
{"title":"体积调节电弧治疗难治性、皮质类固醇抵抗性眼窝炎性疾病的疗效","authors":"Yan Ma MD , Hai-Yang Chen MD , Fu-Jing Huang MD , Xiao-Lin Pang MD , Jian Zheng MD , Fang He MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in treating corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases, with a focus on radiation therapy (RT) plan design, clinical outcomes, and the incidence of treatment-related side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 patients with refractory, corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases treated with orbital VMAT from November 2019 to July 2022. The primary endpoint was the reduction or cessation of corticosteroid use following RT, with secondary endpoints, including improvements in ocular clinical symptoms (diplopia, proptosis, visual acuity, and extraocular movement) and long-term side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median target dose was 20 Gy, with an average lens irradiation dose of 5.4 Gy. Initially, all 57 patients received corticosteroids. After a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 89.5% (51 of 57) of patients responded positively to RT; in particular, 56.1% (32 of 57) completely tapered off corticosteroids, whereas 33.3% (19 of 57) reduced their dosage. Symptomatic improvements were observed in diplopia (67.3%), proptosis (64.7%), visual acuity (56.1%), and extraocular movements (65.9%). Regarding the long-term side effects of RT, incidences of dry eye syndrome and lens opacities were reported at 3.5% and 1.8%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Orbital VMAT is an effective treatment for refractory, corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases, reducing corticosteroid use and improving ocular symptoms with minimal side effects. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate more appropriate VMAT doses and planning models, enhancing treatment outcomes without increasing RT side effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 8","pages":"Article 101811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy for Refractory, Corticosteroid-Resistant Orbital Inflammatory Diseases\",\"authors\":\"Yan Ma MD , Hai-Yang Chen MD , Fu-Jing Huang MD , Xiao-Lin Pang MD , Jian Zheng MD , Fang He MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in treating corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases, with a focus on radiation therapy (RT) plan design, clinical outcomes, and the incidence of treatment-related side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 patients with refractory, corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases treated with orbital VMAT from November 2019 to July 2022. The primary endpoint was the reduction or cessation of corticosteroid use following RT, with secondary endpoints, including improvements in ocular clinical symptoms (diplopia, proptosis, visual acuity, and extraocular movement) and long-term side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median target dose was 20 Gy, with an average lens irradiation dose of 5.4 Gy. Initially, all 57 patients received corticosteroids. After a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 89.5% (51 of 57) of patients responded positively to RT; in particular, 56.1% (32 of 57) completely tapered off corticosteroids, whereas 33.3% (19 of 57) reduced their dosage. Symptomatic improvements were observed in diplopia (67.3%), proptosis (64.7%), visual acuity (56.1%), and extraocular movements (65.9%). Regarding the long-term side effects of RT, incidences of dry eye syndrome and lens opacities were reported at 3.5% and 1.8%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Orbital VMAT is an effective treatment for refractory, corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases, reducing corticosteroid use and improving ocular symptoms with minimal side effects. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate more appropriate VMAT doses and planning models, enhancing treatment outcomes without increasing RT side effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 101811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy for Refractory, Corticosteroid-Resistant Orbital Inflammatory Diseases
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in treating corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases, with a focus on radiation therapy (RT) plan design, clinical outcomes, and the incidence of treatment-related side effects.
Methods and Materials
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 patients with refractory, corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases treated with orbital VMAT from November 2019 to July 2022. The primary endpoint was the reduction or cessation of corticosteroid use following RT, with secondary endpoints, including improvements in ocular clinical symptoms (diplopia, proptosis, visual acuity, and extraocular movement) and long-term side effects.
Results
The median target dose was 20 Gy, with an average lens irradiation dose of 5.4 Gy. Initially, all 57 patients received corticosteroids. After a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 89.5% (51 of 57) of patients responded positively to RT; in particular, 56.1% (32 of 57) completely tapered off corticosteroids, whereas 33.3% (19 of 57) reduced their dosage. Symptomatic improvements were observed in diplopia (67.3%), proptosis (64.7%), visual acuity (56.1%), and extraocular movements (65.9%). Regarding the long-term side effects of RT, incidences of dry eye syndrome and lens opacities were reported at 3.5% and 1.8%, respectively.
Conclusions
Orbital VMAT is an effective treatment for refractory, corticosteroid-resistant orbital inflammatory diseases, reducing corticosteroid use and improving ocular symptoms with minimal side effects. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate more appropriate VMAT doses and planning models, enhancing treatment outcomes without increasing RT side effects.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.