Yuze Wei , Yanmei Zhu , Qian Dong , Wentao Wang , Tao Yu , Jianjun Zhang , Yue Dong
{"title":"预测局部晚期胃癌PD-1阻断和新辅助化疗治疗反应和血液学毒性的可解释联合模型","authors":"Yuze Wei , Yanmei Zhu , Qian Dong , Wentao Wang , Tao Yu , Jianjun Zhang , Yue Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to establish and validate the interpretable combined models for treatment response (TR) and hematologic toxicity (HT) after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>195 patients with LAGC were enrolled from two centres (117, 50 and 28 patients in the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts). The changes of radiomics features from pre-treatment and post-treatment gastric computed tomography images were extracted to build delta radiomics score and predict TR, as well as another radiomics score from pre-treatment vertebral computed tomography images for the prediction of HT, and both combined models were established from clinicopathological characteristics and radiomics score. The predictive performance of the combined models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics, calibration and decision curve analyses. Interpretability was assessed using the shapley additive explanations framework (SHAP).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The area under curve (AUC) in the combined model for predicting TR were 0.893,0.846 and 0.913 for the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC in the combined model for predicting HT were 0.871, 0.917 and 0.865 for the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. SHAP summary plots show the importance of each feature on the prediction outcome, while waterfall and force plots depict individual features’ contributions to a response variable.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combined models based on radiomics features for predicting TR and HT after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LAGC demonstrated good predictive performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretable combined models for predicting treatment response and hematologic toxicity in locally advanced gastric cancer treated with PD-1 blockade and neoadjuvant chemotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Yuze Wei , Yanmei Zhu , Qian Dong , Wentao Wang , Tao Yu , Jianjun Zhang , Yue Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to establish and validate the interpretable combined models for treatment response (TR) and hematologic toxicity (HT) after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>195 patients with LAGC were enrolled from two centres (117, 50 and 28 patients in the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts). The changes of radiomics features from pre-treatment and post-treatment gastric computed tomography images were extracted to build delta radiomics score and predict TR, as well as another radiomics score from pre-treatment vertebral computed tomography images for the prediction of HT, and both combined models were established from clinicopathological characteristics and radiomics score. The predictive performance of the combined models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics, calibration and decision curve analyses. Interpretability was assessed using the shapley additive explanations framework (SHAP).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The area under curve (AUC) in the combined model for predicting TR were 0.893,0.846 and 0.913 for the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC in the combined model for predicting HT were 0.871, 0.917 and 0.865 for the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. SHAP summary plots show the importance of each feature on the prediction outcome, while waterfall and force plots depict individual features’ contributions to a response variable.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combined models based on radiomics features for predicting TR and HT after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LAGC demonstrated good predictive performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003420\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interpretable combined models for predicting treatment response and hematologic toxicity in locally advanced gastric cancer treated with PD-1 blockade and neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Objectives
The aim of this study was to establish and validate the interpretable combined models for treatment response (TR) and hematologic toxicity (HT) after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
195 patients with LAGC were enrolled from two centres (117, 50 and 28 patients in the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts). The changes of radiomics features from pre-treatment and post-treatment gastric computed tomography images were extracted to build delta radiomics score and predict TR, as well as another radiomics score from pre-treatment vertebral computed tomography images for the prediction of HT, and both combined models were established from clinicopathological characteristics and radiomics score. The predictive performance of the combined models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristics, calibration and decision curve analyses. Interpretability was assessed using the shapley additive explanations framework (SHAP).
Results
The area under curve (AUC) in the combined model for predicting TR were 0.893,0.846 and 0.913 for the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC in the combined model for predicting HT were 0.871, 0.917 and 0.865 for the training, internal validation and external validation cohorts, respectively. SHAP summary plots show the importance of each feature on the prediction outcome, while waterfall and force plots depict individual features’ contributions to a response variable.
Conclusions
The combined models based on radiomics features for predicting TR and HT after programmed cell death protein 1 blockade plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LAGC demonstrated good predictive performance.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.