Marie-Therese Schultes , Daniel Graf , Julia Holzer , Barbara Schober , Christiane Spiel
{"title":"高等院校服务学习的实施与评价","authors":"Marie-Therese Schultes , Daniel Graf , Julia Holzer , Barbara Schober , Christiane Spiel","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Service learning courses enable students and lecturers at higher education institutions to take on social responsibility by collaborating with community partners. In this literature review that is complemented by empirical examples, we present advantages and challenges of this teaching approach as well as guidelines for developing concepts for a university-wide implementation and evaluation of service learning. Our article is informed by higher education, implementation and evaluation research and findings from the Third Mission project of the University of Vienna, Austria. Within the scope of the project, we conducted a multi-stakeholder workshop and an interview study with representatives from seven universities. We illustrate the service learning approach with two course examples from the University of Vienna’s psychology master’s programme. Then, we discuss how service learning can be systematically implemented at the university level using frameworks from implementation science and findings from an interview study. Results indicate that successful implementation of service learning at the university level is supported by long-term collaboration between the university and community partners and an institutional culture that visibly values students’ and lecturers’ additional efforts. Finally, we seek to advance the evaluation of higher education by presenting a comprehensive participatory approach to service learning assessment that actively involves diverse stakeholders, including students, faculty, and community partners and that can be applied across various disciplines. By integrating multiple perspectives, we offer a framework for capturing the multidimensional impacts of service learning on educational outcomes and community engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and evaluation of service learning at higher education institutions\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Therese Schultes , Daniel Graf , Julia Holzer , Barbara Schober , Christiane Spiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Service learning courses enable students and lecturers at higher education institutions to take on social responsibility by collaborating with community partners. In this literature review that is complemented by empirical examples, we present advantages and challenges of this teaching approach as well as guidelines for developing concepts for a university-wide implementation and evaluation of service learning. Our article is informed by higher education, implementation and evaluation research and findings from the Third Mission project of the University of Vienna, Austria. Within the scope of the project, we conducted a multi-stakeholder workshop and an interview study with representatives from seven universities. We illustrate the service learning approach with two course examples from the University of Vienna’s psychology master’s programme. Then, we discuss how service learning can be systematically implemented at the university level using frameworks from implementation science and findings from an interview study. Results indicate that successful implementation of service learning at the university level is supported by long-term collaboration between the university and community partners and an institutional culture that visibly values students’ and lecturers’ additional efforts. Finally, we seek to advance the evaluation of higher education by presenting a comprehensive participatory approach to service learning assessment that actively involves diverse stakeholders, including students, faculty, and community partners and that can be applied across various disciplines. By integrating multiple perspectives, we offer a framework for capturing the multidimensional impacts of service learning on educational outcomes and community engagement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000898\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation and evaluation of service learning at higher education institutions
Service learning courses enable students and lecturers at higher education institutions to take on social responsibility by collaborating with community partners. In this literature review that is complemented by empirical examples, we present advantages and challenges of this teaching approach as well as guidelines for developing concepts for a university-wide implementation and evaluation of service learning. Our article is informed by higher education, implementation and evaluation research and findings from the Third Mission project of the University of Vienna, Austria. Within the scope of the project, we conducted a multi-stakeholder workshop and an interview study with representatives from seven universities. We illustrate the service learning approach with two course examples from the University of Vienna’s psychology master’s programme. Then, we discuss how service learning can be systematically implemented at the university level using frameworks from implementation science and findings from an interview study. Results indicate that successful implementation of service learning at the university level is supported by long-term collaboration between the university and community partners and an institutional culture that visibly values students’ and lecturers’ additional efforts. Finally, we seek to advance the evaluation of higher education by presenting a comprehensive participatory approach to service learning assessment that actively involves diverse stakeholders, including students, faculty, and community partners and that can be applied across various disciplines. By integrating multiple perspectives, we offer a framework for capturing the multidimensional impacts of service learning on educational outcomes and community engagement.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.