Paul John Kreppold , Andrew William Lacey , Hong Hao , Wensu Chen
{"title":"回顾预制和体积采矿结构:目前的做法,挑战和未来的前景","authors":"Paul John Kreppold , Andrew William Lacey , Hong Hao , Wensu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prefabricated construction continues to gain popularity in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. Prefabrication developed into non-volumetric assembly and then into volumetric construction. Whilst volumetric construction reduces project risk by providing a safer, certain, and sustainable construction approach, it is not without its challenges, specifically the ability to transport oversized volumetric structures to remote Australian locations. It is yet to be accepted as a mainstream construction practice. While the evolution of volumetric construction continues to be a source of interest, more literature on structural volumetric construction within the mining sector is desired. This paper reviews various terminology used in industry and suggests unified terminology for industry participants, including those in the mining sector. The review considers the benefits of prefabricated structures at remote locations in Australia in terms of safety, productivity, quality schedule, cost and sustainability. The perceived challenges are reviewed in terms of planning, sea transportation and road transportation. The paper concludes by proposing an alternative to overcome the challenges and the construction requirements that require consideration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 109506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of prefabrication and volumetric mining structures: Current practice, challenges, and future prospects\",\"authors\":\"Paul John Kreppold , Andrew William Lacey , Hong Hao , Wensu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prefabricated construction continues to gain popularity in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. Prefabrication developed into non-volumetric assembly and then into volumetric construction. Whilst volumetric construction reduces project risk by providing a safer, certain, and sustainable construction approach, it is not without its challenges, specifically the ability to transport oversized volumetric structures to remote Australian locations. It is yet to be accepted as a mainstream construction practice. While the evolution of volumetric construction continues to be a source of interest, more literature on structural volumetric construction within the mining sector is desired. This paper reviews various terminology used in industry and suggests unified terminology for industry participants, including those in the mining sector. The review considers the benefits of prefabricated structures at remote locations in Australia in terms of safety, productivity, quality schedule, cost and sustainability. The perceived challenges are reviewed in terms of planning, sea transportation and road transportation. The paper concludes by proposing an alternative to overcome the challenges and the construction requirements that require consideration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425013219\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425013219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of prefabrication and volumetric mining structures: Current practice, challenges, and future prospects
Prefabricated construction continues to gain popularity in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. Prefabrication developed into non-volumetric assembly and then into volumetric construction. Whilst volumetric construction reduces project risk by providing a safer, certain, and sustainable construction approach, it is not without its challenges, specifically the ability to transport oversized volumetric structures to remote Australian locations. It is yet to be accepted as a mainstream construction practice. While the evolution of volumetric construction continues to be a source of interest, more literature on structural volumetric construction within the mining sector is desired. This paper reviews various terminology used in industry and suggests unified terminology for industry participants, including those in the mining sector. The review considers the benefits of prefabricated structures at remote locations in Australia in terms of safety, productivity, quality schedule, cost and sustainability. The perceived challenges are reviewed in terms of planning, sea transportation and road transportation. The paper concludes by proposing an alternative to overcome the challenges and the construction requirements that require consideration.
期刊介绍:
Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.