Elizabeth L. Norton MD , Yanhua Wang PhD , Parth M. Patel MD , Dov Levine MD , Jose Binongo PhD , Bradley G. Leshnower MD , Hiroo Takayama MD , Edward P. Chen MD
{"title":"保留瓣膜的根置换:多大的年龄算太老?","authors":"Elizabeth L. Norton MD , Yanhua Wang PhD , Parth M. Patel MD , Dov Levine MD , Jose Binongo PhD , Bradley G. Leshnower MD , Hiroo Takayama MD , Edward P. Chen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Although typically offered in young patients, VSRR is performed over a wide age range, including into the eighth decade of life. This study analyzed the influence of age and preoperative comorbidities on operative outcomes, reoperation, and survival following VSRR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2004 to 2021, 780 patients underwent VSRR in an academic database. VSRR was performed using the David V reimplantation technique. A discriminating age cutoff for the effect of age on long-term survival was determined by Contal and O'Quigley methods and patients were divided into 2 groups based on age at time of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The optimal age cutoff for patients undergoing VSRR was found to be 65 years; 16% were aged 65 years or older at time of surgery. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 1.5% and was significantly higher among the group of patients older than age 65 years (4.1% vs 1.1%; <em>P</em> = .03). The cumulative incidence of reoperation of the aortic valve or proximal aorta was similar between the group of patients aged 65 years and older and patients younger than age 65 years (5% vs 6%; <em>P</em> = .28). Overall, 10-year survival was 89% and significantly worse among the patients aged 65 years and older (76% vs 92%; <em>P</em> < .0001). Age 65 years and older was an independent risk factor for late mortality (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; <em>P</em> = .003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VSRR can be performed with low operative mortality and excellent freedom from reoperation across age groups. In patients aged 65 years and older, serious consideration should be given when deciding on VSRR, especially in the setting of aortic dissection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valve-sparing root replacement: How old is too old?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth L. Norton MD , Yanhua Wang PhD , Parth M. Patel MD , Dov Levine MD , Jose Binongo PhD , Bradley G. Leshnower MD , Hiroo Takayama MD , Edward P. Chen MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Although typically offered in young patients, VSRR is performed over a wide age range, including into the eighth decade of life. This study analyzed the influence of age and preoperative comorbidities on operative outcomes, reoperation, and survival following VSRR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2004 to 2021, 780 patients underwent VSRR in an academic database. VSRR was performed using the David V reimplantation technique. A discriminating age cutoff for the effect of age on long-term survival was determined by Contal and O'Quigley methods and patients were divided into 2 groups based on age at time of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The optimal age cutoff for patients undergoing VSRR was found to be 65 years; 16% were aged 65 years or older at time of surgery. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 1.5% and was significantly higher among the group of patients older than age 65 years (4.1% vs 1.1%; <em>P</em> = .03). The cumulative incidence of reoperation of the aortic valve or proximal aorta was similar between the group of patients aged 65 years and older and patients younger than age 65 years (5% vs 6%; <em>P</em> = .28). Overall, 10-year survival was 89% and significantly worse among the patients aged 65 years and older (76% vs 92%; <em>P</em> < .0001). Age 65 years and older was an independent risk factor for late mortality (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; <em>P</em> = .003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VSRR can be performed with low operative mortality and excellent freedom from reoperation across age groups. In patients aged 65 years and older, serious consideration should be given when deciding on VSRR, especially in the setting of aortic dissection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:保留evalve的根置换(VSRR)具有良好的短期和长期疗效。虽然VSRR通常在年轻患者中提供,但它在广泛的年龄范围内进行,包括进入生命的80岁。本研究分析了年龄和术前合并症对VSRR术后手术结果、再手术和生存的影响。方法从2004年到2021年,780名患者在学术数据库中接受了VSRR。采用David V型再植技术进行VSRR。采用Contal和O'Quigley方法确定年龄对长期生存影响的判别年龄截止点,并根据手术时的年龄将患者分为两组。结果VSRR患者的最佳年龄截止年龄为65岁;16%的患者手术时年龄在65岁或以上。总体而言,住院死亡率为1.5%,65岁以上患者组的住院死亡率明显更高(4.1% vs 1.1%;P = .03)。65岁及以上患者和65岁以下患者的主动脉瓣或近端主动脉再手术的累积发生率相似(5% vs 6%;P = .28)。总体而言,65岁及以上患者的10年生存率为89%,明显更差(76% vs 92%;P & lt;。)。65岁及以上年龄是晚期死亡的独立危险因素(危险比1.04;95% ci, 1.01-1.07;P = .003)。结论svsrr手术死亡率低,无再手术风险。对于65岁及以上的患者,在决定VSRR时应认真考虑,特别是在主动脉夹层的情况下。
Valve-sparing root replacement: How old is too old?
Objective
Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is associated with excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Although typically offered in young patients, VSRR is performed over a wide age range, including into the eighth decade of life. This study analyzed the influence of age and preoperative comorbidities on operative outcomes, reoperation, and survival following VSRR.
Methods
From 2004 to 2021, 780 patients underwent VSRR in an academic database. VSRR was performed using the David V reimplantation technique. A discriminating age cutoff for the effect of age on long-term survival was determined by Contal and O'Quigley methods and patients were divided into 2 groups based on age at time of surgery.
Results
The optimal age cutoff for patients undergoing VSRR was found to be 65 years; 16% were aged 65 years or older at time of surgery. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 1.5% and was significantly higher among the group of patients older than age 65 years (4.1% vs 1.1%; P = .03). The cumulative incidence of reoperation of the aortic valve or proximal aorta was similar between the group of patients aged 65 years and older and patients younger than age 65 years (5% vs 6%; P = .28). Overall, 10-year survival was 89% and significantly worse among the patients aged 65 years and older (76% vs 92%; P < .0001). Age 65 years and older was an independent risk factor for late mortality (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = .003).
Conclusions
VSRR can be performed with low operative mortality and excellent freedom from reoperation across age groups. In patients aged 65 years and older, serious consideration should be given when deciding on VSRR, especially in the setting of aortic dissection.