Mehmet H. Akay MD, Mateja K. Jezovnik MD, PhD, Rajko Radovancevic MD, Ismael A. Salas de Armas MD, Maria Patarroyo Aponte MD, Marwan Jumean MD, Manish K. Patel MD, Jayeshkumar Patel MD, Biswajit Kar MD, Igor D. Gregoric MD
{"title":"细胞外基质支架对左心室辅助装置患者传动系统感染率的影响","authors":"Mehmet H. Akay MD, Mateja K. Jezovnik MD, PhD, Rajko Radovancevic MD, Ismael A. Salas de Armas MD, Maria Patarroyo Aponte MD, Marwan Jumean MD, Manish K. Patel MD, Jayeshkumar Patel MD, Biswajit Kar MD, Igor D. Gregoric MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with advanced heart failure. However, postimplantation complications such as driveline infections (DLIs) can significantly affect patient outcomes. We assessed whether placing an extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold around the driveline during LVAD implantation reduces the incidence of DLIs in patients with LVADs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study included 196 consecutive patients with LVADs between January 2018 and June 2022. We compared the data of patients who received ECM implantation during LVAD implantation (ECM group, n = 69) with those who did not (control group, n = 127).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, 24 of 196 (12.2%) patients with LVADs developed a DLI. Patients who underwent ECM placement exhibited a significantly lower incidence of DLIs than those in the control group (ECM 3/69 vs control 21/127; <em>P</em> = .012).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients who received ECM implantation at the time of LVAD implantation had a significantly lower rate of DLIs than patients who did not receive ECM around the driveline. These results suggest that ECM may be a valuable adjunctive strategy to reduce the risk of DLIs in LVAD recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 200-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of extracellular matrix scaffold on driveline infection rate in patients with left ventricular assist devices\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet H. Akay MD, Mateja K. Jezovnik MD, PhD, Rajko Radovancevic MD, Ismael A. Salas de Armas MD, Maria Patarroyo Aponte MD, Marwan Jumean MD, Manish K. Patel MD, Jayeshkumar Patel MD, Biswajit Kar MD, Igor D. Gregoric MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with advanced heart failure. However, postimplantation complications such as driveline infections (DLIs) can significantly affect patient outcomes. We assessed whether placing an extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold around the driveline during LVAD implantation reduces the incidence of DLIs in patients with LVADs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective observational study included 196 consecutive patients with LVADs between January 2018 and June 2022. We compared the data of patients who received ECM implantation during LVAD implantation (ECM group, n = 69) with those who did not (control group, n = 127).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study period, 24 of 196 (12.2%) patients with LVADs developed a DLI. Patients who underwent ECM placement exhibited a significantly lower incidence of DLIs than those in the control group (ECM 3/69 vs control 21/127; <em>P</em> = .012).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients who received ECM implantation at the time of LVAD implantation had a significantly lower rate of DLIs than patients who did not receive ECM around the driveline. These results suggest that ECM may be a valuable adjunctive strategy to reduce the risk of DLIs in LVAD recipients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 200-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625001299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625001299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of extracellular matrix scaffold on driveline infection rate in patients with left ventricular assist devices
Objective
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with advanced heart failure. However, postimplantation complications such as driveline infections (DLIs) can significantly affect patient outcomes. We assessed whether placing an extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold around the driveline during LVAD implantation reduces the incidence of DLIs in patients with LVADs.
Methods
This retrospective observational study included 196 consecutive patients with LVADs between January 2018 and June 2022. We compared the data of patients who received ECM implantation during LVAD implantation (ECM group, n = 69) with those who did not (control group, n = 127).
Results
During the study period, 24 of 196 (12.2%) patients with LVADs developed a DLI. Patients who underwent ECM placement exhibited a significantly lower incidence of DLIs than those in the control group (ECM 3/69 vs control 21/127; P = .012).
Conclusions
Patients who received ECM implantation at the time of LVAD implantation had a significantly lower rate of DLIs than patients who did not receive ECM around the driveline. These results suggest that ECM may be a valuable adjunctive strategy to reduce the risk of DLIs in LVAD recipients.