现代供体距离对移植后死亡率的影响

IF 1.9
David Rekhtman BS , Sharon Lee BS , Amit Iyengar MD, MSE , Cindy Song BA , Noah Weingarten MD , Max Shin MD , Michaela Asher MPhil , Joyce Jiang BS , Marisa Cevasco MD, MPH , Pavan Atluri MD
{"title":"现代供体距离对移植后死亡率的影响","authors":"David Rekhtman BS ,&nbsp;Sharon Lee BS ,&nbsp;Amit Iyengar MD, MSE ,&nbsp;Cindy Song BA ,&nbsp;Noah Weingarten MD ,&nbsp;Max Shin MD ,&nbsp;Michaela Asher MPhil ,&nbsp;Joyce Jiang BS ,&nbsp;Marisa Cevasco MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Pavan Atluri MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In the new US heart transplant allocation system, eligible patients can receive hearts from donors beyond a 250-mile radius. The safety of extended travel and its impact on ischemic time are poorly understood. This study examines post-transplantation mortality based on distance between donor and transplant centers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult patients listed as status 1 or 2 for isolated heart transplantation between October 18, 2018, and September 30, 2023, who subsequently received an organ were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were stratified by donor distance (≤250 or &gt;250 miles). Linear and logistic models analyzed the relationships among 1-year survival, distance, and ischemic time. The 1-year mortality was further characterized by Kaplan–Meier analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 5315 patients included in this cohort, 45% received hearts within a 250-mile radius, and 55% received hearts from distances beyond 250 miles. The majority of patients were male and White, and had dilated cardiomyopathy. Assessment of the relationship between distance and ischemic time showed an 18-minute increase for every additional 100 miles of travel. Multivariable logistic regression indicated increased mortality with longer ischemic times, but no difference in survival with increasing distances. Further, on multivariable time-dependent analysis, increasing ischemic time was a predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.19 [1.01-1.21]), whereas increased donor distance was not (odds ratio, 0.84 [0.68-1.04]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Distance between donor and transplant center minimally affected ischemic time and showed no impact on post-transplant 1-year survival. Therefore, ischemic time limitations rather than distance cutoffs may be more appropriate for policies regarding heart procurement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"25 ","pages":"Pages 241-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of donor distance on post-transplant mortality in the modern era\",\"authors\":\"David Rekhtman BS ,&nbsp;Sharon Lee BS ,&nbsp;Amit Iyengar MD, MSE ,&nbsp;Cindy Song BA ,&nbsp;Noah Weingarten MD ,&nbsp;Max Shin MD ,&nbsp;Michaela Asher MPhil ,&nbsp;Joyce Jiang BS ,&nbsp;Marisa Cevasco MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Pavan Atluri MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In the new US heart transplant allocation system, eligible patients can receive hearts from donors beyond a 250-mile radius. The safety of extended travel and its impact on ischemic time are poorly understood. This study examines post-transplantation mortality based on distance between donor and transplant centers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult patients listed as status 1 or 2 for isolated heart transplantation between October 18, 2018, and September 30, 2023, who subsequently received an organ were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were stratified by donor distance (≤250 or &gt;250 miles). Linear and logistic models analyzed the relationships among 1-year survival, distance, and ischemic time. The 1-year mortality was further characterized by Kaplan–Meier analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 5315 patients included in this cohort, 45% received hearts within a 250-mile radius, and 55% received hearts from distances beyond 250 miles. The majority of patients were male and White, and had dilated cardiomyopathy. Assessment of the relationship between distance and ischemic time showed an 18-minute increase for every additional 100 miles of travel. Multivariable logistic regression indicated increased mortality with longer ischemic times, but no difference in survival with increasing distances. Further, on multivariable time-dependent analysis, increasing ischemic time was a predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.19 [1.01-1.21]), whereas increased donor distance was not (odds ratio, 0.84 [0.68-1.04]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Distance between donor and transplant center minimally affected ischemic time and showed no impact on post-transplant 1-year survival. Therefore, ischemic time limitations rather than distance cutoffs may be more appropriate for policies regarding heart procurement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 241-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在新的美国心脏移植分配系统中,符合条件的患者可以接受半径250英里以外的捐赠者的心脏。长时间旅行的安全性及其对缺血时间的影响尚不清楚。本研究考察了基于供体和移植中心之间距离的移植后死亡率。方法2018年10月18日至2023年9月30日期间,在离体心脏移植中被列为1或2级状态的成年患者,随后接受了器官共享联合网络数据库中的器官。根据供体距离(≤250或250英里)对患者进行分层。线性和逻辑模型分析了1年生存率、距离和缺血时间之间的关系。1年死亡率进一步采用Kaplan-Meier分析。结果在该队列中的5315名患者中,45%的患者接受了250英里半径内的心脏移植,55%的患者接受了250英里以外的心脏移植。大多数患者为白人男性,扩张型心肌病。对距离和缺血时间之间关系的评估显示,每多走100英里,大脑缺血时间就会增加18分钟。多变量logistic回归表明,缺血时间越长,死亡率越高,但缺血距离越长,生存率无差异。此外,在多变量时间相关分析中,缺血时间的增加是死亡率的预测因子(优势比为1.19[1.01-1.21]),而供体距离的增加则不是(优势比为0.84[0.68-1.04])。结论供体与移植中心的距离对缺血时间影响最小,对移植后1年生存率无影响。因此,缺血时间限制而不是距离限制可能更适合心脏获取的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of donor distance on post-transplant mortality in the modern era

Objective

In the new US heart transplant allocation system, eligible patients can receive hearts from donors beyond a 250-mile radius. The safety of extended travel and its impact on ischemic time are poorly understood. This study examines post-transplantation mortality based on distance between donor and transplant centers.

Methods

Adult patients listed as status 1 or 2 for isolated heart transplantation between October 18, 2018, and September 30, 2023, who subsequently received an organ were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were stratified by donor distance (≤250 or >250 miles). Linear and logistic models analyzed the relationships among 1-year survival, distance, and ischemic time. The 1-year mortality was further characterized by Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Of the 5315 patients included in this cohort, 45% received hearts within a 250-mile radius, and 55% received hearts from distances beyond 250 miles. The majority of patients were male and White, and had dilated cardiomyopathy. Assessment of the relationship between distance and ischemic time showed an 18-minute increase for every additional 100 miles of travel. Multivariable logistic regression indicated increased mortality with longer ischemic times, but no difference in survival with increasing distances. Further, on multivariable time-dependent analysis, increasing ischemic time was a predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.19 [1.01-1.21]), whereas increased donor distance was not (odds ratio, 0.84 [0.68-1.04]).

Conclusions

Distance between donor and transplant center minimally affected ischemic time and showed no impact on post-transplant 1-year survival. Therefore, ischemic time limitations rather than distance cutoffs may be more appropriate for policies regarding heart procurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信