Mirjam de Bruin-Hoegée , Bence Dallos , Tomas van Groningen , Jelle de Koning , Latifa Lamriti , Marcel J. van der Schans , Arian C. van Asten
{"title":"发现混凝土中氯气暴露的选择性标记物","authors":"Mirjam de Bruin-Hoegée , Bence Dallos , Tomas van Groningen , Jelle de Koning , Latifa Lamriti , Marcel J. van der Schans , Arian C. van Asten","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2025.100680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chlorine gas (Cl<sub>2</sub>) is still being used as a chemical weapon in modern war zones. After an attack with this toxic chemical, verifying its use is challenging due to its reactivity and rapid evaporation. Additionally, only a limited number of selective markers relating to the use of chlorine gas are found. For forensic purposes it is necessary to discriminate Cl<sub>2</sub> from other chlorine containing chemicals. Therefore, the current study aims to use gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) together with machine learning methods to discover selective markers for chlorine gas exposure. Four types of concrete originating from Europe or the Middle East were exposed to various levels of Cl<sub>2</sub> as well as to some commonly used chlorine containing chemicals. After extraction with various solvents, the samples were analyzed. Based on the tentative identification of 32 chlorinated markers with GC–MS and 146 markers with LC-HRMS/MS, principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were constructed. A clear distinction between concrete samples exposed to bleach and chlorine gas was apparent. For forensic classification, a Bayesian likelihood ratio (LR) model was applied that showed limited rates of misleading evidence and maximum LRs of 0.038 to 93. The markers chloroacetone, dichloroacetone, tetrachlorophenol, and 5-chloro-8-quinolinol were found to be selective for chlorine gas exposure. Their identity was verified by GC–MS/MS and LC-MS/MS in comparison with commercially available reference standards. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of chemical profiling in concrete to differentiate among various chlorinating agents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discovery of selective markers for chlorine gas exposure in concrete\",\"authors\":\"Mirjam de Bruin-Hoegée , Bence Dallos , Tomas van Groningen , Jelle de Koning , Latifa Lamriti , Marcel J. van der Schans , Arian C. van Asten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2025.100680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chlorine gas (Cl<sub>2</sub>) is still being used as a chemical weapon in modern war zones. After an attack with this toxic chemical, verifying its use is challenging due to its reactivity and rapid evaporation. Additionally, only a limited number of selective markers relating to the use of chlorine gas are found. For forensic purposes it is necessary to discriminate Cl<sub>2</sub> from other chlorine containing chemicals. Therefore, the current study aims to use gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) together with machine learning methods to discover selective markers for chlorine gas exposure. Four types of concrete originating from Europe or the Middle East were exposed to various levels of Cl<sub>2</sub> as well as to some commonly used chlorine containing chemicals. After extraction with various solvents, the samples were analyzed. Based on the tentative identification of 32 chlorinated markers with GC–MS and 146 markers with LC-HRMS/MS, principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were constructed. A clear distinction between concrete samples exposed to bleach and chlorine gas was apparent. For forensic classification, a Bayesian likelihood ratio (LR) model was applied that showed limited rates of misleading evidence and maximum LRs of 0.038 to 93. The markers chloroacetone, dichloroacetone, tetrachlorophenol, and 5-chloro-8-quinolinol were found to be selective for chlorine gas exposure. Their identity was verified by GC–MS/MS and LC-MS/MS in comparison with commercially available reference standards. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of chemical profiling in concrete to differentiate among various chlorinating agents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170925000426\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170925000426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discovery of selective markers for chlorine gas exposure in concrete
Chlorine gas (Cl2) is still being used as a chemical weapon in modern war zones. After an attack with this toxic chemical, verifying its use is challenging due to its reactivity and rapid evaporation. Additionally, only a limited number of selective markers relating to the use of chlorine gas are found. For forensic purposes it is necessary to discriminate Cl2 from other chlorine containing chemicals. Therefore, the current study aims to use gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) together with machine learning methods to discover selective markers for chlorine gas exposure. Four types of concrete originating from Europe or the Middle East were exposed to various levels of Cl2 as well as to some commonly used chlorine containing chemicals. After extraction with various solvents, the samples were analyzed. Based on the tentative identification of 32 chlorinated markers with GC–MS and 146 markers with LC-HRMS/MS, principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were constructed. A clear distinction between concrete samples exposed to bleach and chlorine gas was apparent. For forensic classification, a Bayesian likelihood ratio (LR) model was applied that showed limited rates of misleading evidence and maximum LRs of 0.038 to 93. The markers chloroacetone, dichloroacetone, tetrachlorophenol, and 5-chloro-8-quinolinol were found to be selective for chlorine gas exposure. Their identity was verified by GC–MS/MS and LC-MS/MS in comparison with commercially available reference standards. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of chemical profiling in concrete to differentiate among various chlorinating agents.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.