通过互动投票和小组讨论探索产科麻醉的临床难题:来自加拿大产科麻醉专家的见解。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anthony Chau, Roanne Preston, Paul M Wieczorek, Dolores M McKeen, Lorraine Chow, Wesley Edwards, Valerie Zaphiratos
{"title":"通过互动投票和小组讨论探索产科麻醉的临床难题:来自加拿大产科麻醉专家的见解。","authors":"Anthony Chau, Roanne Preston, Paul M Wieczorek, Dolores M McKeen, Lorraine Chow, Wesley Edwards, Valerie Zaphiratos","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02986-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This Special Article aims to synthesize the results of a live audience poll and practice tips from Canadian obstetric anesthesiology experts during a panel session at the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2024 Annual Meeting (Victoria, BC, Canada). We explored six hypothetical case scenarios, each representing a clinically plausible situation that lack a definitive management approach. These scenarios highlight areas where no consensus exists and no single \"correct\" solution has been established.</p><p><strong>Source: </strong>We gathered live poll data about six case scenarios from participants who attended the session and chose to submit a response. The expert panel provided decision analysis of each case.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The literature and expert panel suggest that 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine and 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine may be appropriate alternatives during shortages of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Both combined spinal epidural and standard epidural techniques are effective first choices for rescuing a failed single-shot spinal anesthesia during elective Cesarean delivery. A decision aid may be helpful when converting an epidural for surgical anesthesia. Epidural dexmedetomidine has been used off-label in some centres to enhance the quality of labour analgesia. Nevertheless, owing to limited data in the literature, its routine use for labour analgesia or Cesarean delivery is not currently recommended. In cases of febrile labouring patients, the expert panel advocates initiating antibiotics before epidural placement as a prudent precaution despite the lack of robust contemporary evidence. An obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia may generally undergo neuraxial techniques if the platelet count exceeds 70 × 10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup>. The risks and benefits should be carefully considered when the platelet count is between 50 × 10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup> and 69 × 10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup>, taking into account potential changes in platelet quality due to conditions such as hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. If an accidental dural puncture occurs during an epidural blood patch procedure, a cautious approach would involve abandoning the procedure and reattempting after 24 hr to minimize the risk of blood translocation leading to arachnoiditis. Conversely, a pragmatic approach would involve immediately reattempting the procedure at another level, although there is no consensus on the most appropriate course of action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The range of participant responses highlighted various clinical challenges in obstetric anesthesia where evidence is still limited or inconclusive. Three experts in obstetric anesthesia shared their insights, detailing their decision-making processes and how they would approach each case scenario. They also provided key references, offering valuable take-home messages for anesthesiologists practicing obstetric anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":"1047-1055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring clinical conundrums in obstetric anesthesia through interactive polls and panel discussion: insights from Canadian obstetric anesthesiology experts.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Chau, Roanne Preston, Paul M Wieczorek, Dolores M McKeen, Lorraine Chow, Wesley Edwards, Valerie Zaphiratos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-025-02986-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This Special Article aims to synthesize the results of a live audience poll and practice tips from Canadian obstetric anesthesiology experts during a panel session at the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2024 Annual Meeting (Victoria, BC, Canada). We explored six hypothetical case scenarios, each representing a clinically plausible situation that lack a definitive management approach. These scenarios highlight areas where no consensus exists and no single \\\"correct\\\" solution has been established.</p><p><strong>Source: </strong>We gathered live poll data about six case scenarios from participants who attended the session and chose to submit a response. The expert panel provided decision analysis of each case.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The literature and expert panel suggest that 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine and 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine may be appropriate alternatives during shortages of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Both combined spinal epidural and standard epidural techniques are effective first choices for rescuing a failed single-shot spinal anesthesia during elective Cesarean delivery. A decision aid may be helpful when converting an epidural for surgical anesthesia. Epidural dexmedetomidine has been used off-label in some centres to enhance the quality of labour analgesia. Nevertheless, owing to limited data in the literature, its routine use for labour analgesia or Cesarean delivery is not currently recommended. In cases of febrile labouring patients, the expert panel advocates initiating antibiotics before epidural placement as a prudent precaution despite the lack of robust contemporary evidence. An obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia may generally undergo neuraxial techniques if the platelet count exceeds 70 × 10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup>. The risks and benefits should be carefully considered when the platelet count is between 50 × 10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup> and 69 × 10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup>, taking into account potential changes in platelet quality due to conditions such as hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. If an accidental dural puncture occurs during an epidural blood patch procedure, a cautious approach would involve abandoning the procedure and reattempting after 24 hr to minimize the risk of blood translocation leading to arachnoiditis. Conversely, a pragmatic approach would involve immediately reattempting the procedure at another level, although there is no consensus on the most appropriate course of action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The range of participant responses highlighted various clinical challenges in obstetric anesthesia where evidence is still limited or inconclusive. Three experts in obstetric anesthesia shared their insights, detailing their decision-making processes and how they would approach each case scenario. They also provided key references, offering valuable take-home messages for anesthesiologists practicing obstetric anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1047-1055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02986-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02986-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这篇专题文章旨在综合加拿大麻醉师协会2024年年会(维多利亚,BC,加拿大)小组会议期间加拿大产科麻醉学专家的现场观众调查结果和实践提示。我们探讨了六种假设的病例情景,每一种都代表了一种缺乏明确管理方法的临床可信情况。这些场景突出了没有达成共识的领域,也没有建立单一的“正确”解决方案。来源:我们从参加会议并选择提交答复的参与者那里收集了关于六个案例场景的实时民意调查数据。专家小组对每个案例进行了决策分析。主要发现:文献和专家小组建议,在0.75%高压布比卡因短缺时,0.5%等压布比卡因和0.5%高压罗哌卡因可能是适当的替代品。脊髓硬膜外联合技术和标准硬膜外技术是选择性剖宫产术中抢救单次脊髓麻醉失败的有效首选。当硬膜外麻醉转换为手术麻醉时,辅助决策可能会有所帮助。硬膜外右美托咪定已在一些中心使用标签外,以提高分娩镇痛的质量。然而,由于文献资料有限,目前不建议将其常规用于分娩镇痛或剖宫产。在发热难产患者的情况下,专家小组提倡在硬膜外放置前开始使用抗生素,作为一种谨慎的预防措施,尽管缺乏有力的当代证据。如果血小板计数超过70 × 109·L-1,产科血小板减少患者通常可以接受轴向技术。当血小板计数在50 × 109·L-1和69 × 109·L-1之间时,应仔细考虑风险和收益,并考虑溶血、肝酶升高和低血小板(HELLP)综合征等条件可能导致的血小板质量变化。如果在硬膜外补血过程中意外发生硬脑膜穿刺,谨慎的做法包括放弃该手术,并在24小时后重新尝试,以尽量减少血液移位导致蛛网膜炎的风险。相反,务实的做法将涉及立即在另一级重新尝试这一程序,尽管对最适当的行动方针没有协商一致意见。结论:参与者的反应范围突出了产科麻醉的各种临床挑战,其中证据仍然有限或不确定。三位产科麻醉专家分享了他们的见解,详细介绍了他们的决策过程以及他们如何处理每种情况。他们还提供了关键的参考资料,为麻醉师实践产科麻醉提供了宝贵的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring clinical conundrums in obstetric anesthesia through interactive polls and panel discussion: insights from Canadian obstetric anesthesiology experts.

Purpose: This Special Article aims to synthesize the results of a live audience poll and practice tips from Canadian obstetric anesthesiology experts during a panel session at the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2024 Annual Meeting (Victoria, BC, Canada). We explored six hypothetical case scenarios, each representing a clinically plausible situation that lack a definitive management approach. These scenarios highlight areas where no consensus exists and no single "correct" solution has been established.

Source: We gathered live poll data about six case scenarios from participants who attended the session and chose to submit a response. The expert panel provided decision analysis of each case.

Principal findings: The literature and expert panel suggest that 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine and 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine may be appropriate alternatives during shortages of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Both combined spinal epidural and standard epidural techniques are effective first choices for rescuing a failed single-shot spinal anesthesia during elective Cesarean delivery. A decision aid may be helpful when converting an epidural for surgical anesthesia. Epidural dexmedetomidine has been used off-label in some centres to enhance the quality of labour analgesia. Nevertheless, owing to limited data in the literature, its routine use for labour analgesia or Cesarean delivery is not currently recommended. In cases of febrile labouring patients, the expert panel advocates initiating antibiotics before epidural placement as a prudent precaution despite the lack of robust contemporary evidence. An obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia may generally undergo neuraxial techniques if the platelet count exceeds 70 × 109·L-1. The risks and benefits should be carefully considered when the platelet count is between 50 × 109·L-1 and 69 × 109·L-1, taking into account potential changes in platelet quality due to conditions such as hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome. If an accidental dural puncture occurs during an epidural blood patch procedure, a cautious approach would involve abandoning the procedure and reattempting after 24 hr to minimize the risk of blood translocation leading to arachnoiditis. Conversely, a pragmatic approach would involve immediately reattempting the procedure at another level, although there is no consensus on the most appropriate course of action.

Conclusions: The range of participant responses highlighted various clinical challenges in obstetric anesthesia where evidence is still limited or inconclusive. Three experts in obstetric anesthesia shared their insights, detailing their decision-making processes and how they would approach each case scenario. They also provided key references, offering valuable take-home messages for anesthesiologists practicing obstetric anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信