Sandhya Mehta, Jackie Kwong, Clara Lam, Bruce Feinberg
{"title":"激素受体阳性/ her2低转移性乳腺癌患者接受化疗的现实世界治疗模式和结果","authors":"Sandhya Mehta, Jackie Kwong, Clara Lam, Bruce Feinberg","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hormonal therapy (HT) based regimen is the preferred first-line (1L) treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low expression. However, HT resistance frequently emerges with many receiving subsequent chemotherapy (CT). This study aimed to examine CT treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patient characteristics and clinical data of adults receiving CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC were collected via physician-abstracted chart review from 10/1/2021 to 1/31/2022. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics with the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Statistical comparisons were conducted between patients who received 1L CT vs CT after HT-based regimens (any line).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty three HR+/HER2-low patients were included, and CT utilization was described by line within metastatic setting: 1L = 20.2% (n = 45), 2L 26.4% (n = 59), 3L+ = 53.4% (n = 119). A higher rate of visceral metastases (86.7% vs 65.7%, P = .01) and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (88.9% vs 70.2%, P = 0.01) were associated with 1L CT vs CT post-HT-based treatment. The median time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) of CT were similar between the groups (TTD: 6.7 months vs 8.3 months for the 1L CT and CT post-HT-based regimen groups, respectively, P = .13; rwPFS: 9.3 months vs 8.8 months, P = .26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of HR+/HER2-low mBC patients, most patients switched to CT after two lines of therapy with a median rwPFS shorter than 10 months. The findings highlight unmet needs for a more effective targeted therapeutic alternative to CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Sandhya Mehta, Jackie Kwong, Clara Lam, Bruce Feinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hormonal therapy (HT) based regimen is the preferred first-line (1L) treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low expression. However, HT resistance frequently emerges with many receiving subsequent chemotherapy (CT). This study aimed to examine CT treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patient characteristics and clinical data of adults receiving CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC were collected via physician-abstracted chart review from 10/1/2021 to 1/31/2022. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics with the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Statistical comparisons were conducted between patients who received 1L CT vs CT after HT-based regimens (any line).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty three HR+/HER2-low patients were included, and CT utilization was described by line within metastatic setting: 1L = 20.2% (n = 45), 2L 26.4% (n = 59), 3L+ = 53.4% (n = 119). A higher rate of visceral metastases (86.7% vs 65.7%, P = .01) and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (88.9% vs 70.2%, P = 0.01) were associated with 1L CT vs CT post-HT-based treatment. The median time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) of CT were similar between the groups (TTD: 6.7 months vs 8.3 months for the 1L CT and CT post-HT-based regimen groups, respectively, P = .13; rwPFS: 9.3 months vs 8.8 months, P = .26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of HR+/HER2-low mBC patients, most patients switched to CT after two lines of therapy with a median rwPFS shorter than 10 months. The findings highlight unmet needs for a more effective targeted therapeutic alternative to CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200229/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.
Introduction: Hormonal therapy (HT) based regimen is the preferred first-line (1L) treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low expression. However, HT resistance frequently emerges with many receiving subsequent chemotherapy (CT). This study aimed to examine CT treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC.
Patients and methods: Patient characteristics and clinical data of adults receiving CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC were collected via physician-abstracted chart review from 10/1/2021 to 1/31/2022. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics with the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Statistical comparisons were conducted between patients who received 1L CT vs CT after HT-based regimens (any line).
Results: Two hundred and twenty three HR+/HER2-low patients were included, and CT utilization was described by line within metastatic setting: 1L = 20.2% (n = 45), 2L 26.4% (n = 59), 3L+ = 53.4% (n = 119). A higher rate of visceral metastases (86.7% vs 65.7%, P = .01) and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (88.9% vs 70.2%, P = 0.01) were associated with 1L CT vs CT post-HT-based treatment. The median time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) of CT were similar between the groups (TTD: 6.7 months vs 8.3 months for the 1L CT and CT post-HT-based regimen groups, respectively, P = .13; rwPFS: 9.3 months vs 8.8 months, P = .26).
Conclusion: In this sample of HR+/HER2-low mBC patients, most patients switched to CT after two lines of therapy with a median rwPFS shorter than 10 months. The findings highlight unmet needs for a more effective targeted therapeutic alternative to CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC patients.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.