胸膜间皮瘤新预后基因特征的鉴定:基于癌症基因组图谱数据库和实验验证的研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2025-05-30 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.21037/tcr-2024-2531
Xinmeng Wang, Yongqin Yang, Wenzhong Yang, Xi Yang, Jinsong Li, Yaru Lin, Zhengliang Li, Jiangyan Li, Wei Xiong
{"title":"胸膜间皮瘤新预后基因特征的鉴定:基于癌症基因组图谱数据库和实验验证的研究。","authors":"Xinmeng Wang, Yongqin Yang, Wenzhong Yang, Xi Yang, Jinsong Li, Yaru Lin, Zhengliang Li, Jiangyan Li, Wei Xiong","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2024-2531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection and prognostic prediction are crucial in improving the survival of patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM). Therefore, this study aimed to develop a gene prognostic risk model for PM patients based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database analysis and experimental validations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Obtaining gene expression data and clinical information of PM from the TCGA database, the dataset was divided into a training set and a testing set. Univariate Cox regression analysis, robust testing, and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed on the training set to establish a prognostic risk model. Risk scores were calculated for each patient, and the dataset was stratified into high- and low-risk groups. The predictive efficacy and accuracy of the model were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of genes in the prognostic model in clinical samples and PM cell lines were detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Gene expression validation in the prognostic model was conducted using samples from the TCGA and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project databases. The University of ALabama at birmingham CANcer data analysis portal (UALCAN) database was utilized to explore the expression patterns of genes in the prognostic model. Finally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on genes in the prognostic model to explore their potential biological functions and signaling pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A prognostic risk assessment model consisting of three genes, ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domain 1 (<i>UHRF1</i>), kinesin family member 4A (<i>KIF4A</i>), and never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 2 (<i>NEK2</i>) was constructed. The risk score of the prognostic model is calculated as follows: risk score = Expression level of UHRF1 × 1.4525 - Expression level of KIF4A × 1.3270 + Expression level of NEK2 × 1.4167. Patients were further stratified into high- and low-risk groups at this optimal cutoff point. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrate that, compared to patients in the high-risk group, those in the low-risk group exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival. Visualization of the model through a forest plot revealed a Log-Rank P<0.0001 for the entire model, indicating its potential as an independent prognostic marker for PM. The mRNA expression levels of three genes in the prognostic model significantly elevated in tumor samples and PM cell lines than in non-tumorigenic tissues and cell lines as detected by qRT-PCR. Additionally, these genes exhibited significant differences in expression among PM patients of different stages, tumor subtypes, ages, and metastatic statuses. The overexpressed group of these three genes was significantly enriched in pathways such as DNA replication, mRNA surveillance pathway, nuclear transport, ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes, and spliceosome pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three prognostic marker genes (<i>UHRF1</i>, <i>KIF4A</i>, and <i>NEK2</i>) as a gene cluster may serve as prognostic marker genes in PM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"14 5","pages":"2981-2998"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of a novel prognostic gene signature in pleural mesothelioma: a study based on The Cancer Genome Atlas database and experimental validation.\",\"authors\":\"Xinmeng Wang, Yongqin Yang, Wenzhong Yang, Xi Yang, Jinsong Li, Yaru Lin, Zhengliang Li, Jiangyan Li, Wei Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tcr-2024-2531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection and prognostic prediction are crucial in improving the survival of patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM). Therefore, this study aimed to develop a gene prognostic risk model for PM patients based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database analysis and experimental validations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Obtaining gene expression data and clinical information of PM from the TCGA database, the dataset was divided into a training set and a testing set. Univariate Cox regression analysis, robust testing, and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed on the training set to establish a prognostic risk model. Risk scores were calculated for each patient, and the dataset was stratified into high- and low-risk groups. The predictive efficacy and accuracy of the model were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of genes in the prognostic model in clinical samples and PM cell lines were detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Gene expression validation in the prognostic model was conducted using samples from the TCGA and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project databases. The University of ALabama at birmingham CANcer data analysis portal (UALCAN) database was utilized to explore the expression patterns of genes in the prognostic model. Finally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on genes in the prognostic model to explore their potential biological functions and signaling pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A prognostic risk assessment model consisting of three genes, ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domain 1 (<i>UHRF1</i>), kinesin family member 4A (<i>KIF4A</i>), and never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 2 (<i>NEK2</i>) was constructed. The risk score of the prognostic model is calculated as follows: risk score = Expression level of UHRF1 × 1.4525 - Expression level of KIF4A × 1.3270 + Expression level of NEK2 × 1.4167. Patients were further stratified into high- and low-risk groups at this optimal cutoff point. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrate that, compared to patients in the high-risk group, those in the low-risk group exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival. Visualization of the model through a forest plot revealed a Log-Rank P<0.0001 for the entire model, indicating its potential as an independent prognostic marker for PM. The mRNA expression levels of three genes in the prognostic model significantly elevated in tumor samples and PM cell lines than in non-tumorigenic tissues and cell lines as detected by qRT-PCR. Additionally, these genes exhibited significant differences in expression among PM patients of different stages, tumor subtypes, ages, and metastatic statuses. The overexpressed group of these three genes was significantly enriched in pathways such as DNA replication, mRNA surveillance pathway, nuclear transport, ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes, and spliceosome pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three prognostic marker genes (<i>UHRF1</i>, <i>KIF4A</i>, and <i>NEK2</i>) as a gene cluster may serve as prognostic marker genes in PM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"2981-2998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2024-2531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2024-2531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期发现和预后预测对提高胸膜间皮瘤(PM)患者的生存率至关重要。因此,本研究旨在基于The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)数据库分析和实验验证,建立PM患者的基因预后风险模型。方法:从TCGA数据库中获取PM的基因表达数据和临床信息,将数据集分为训练集和测试集。对训练集进行单因素Cox回归分析、稳健性检验和多因素Cox回归分析,建立预后风险模型。计算每位患者的风险评分,并将数据集分为高风险组和低风险组。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价模型的预测效果和准确性。采用定量逆转录聚合酶链式反应(qRT-PCR)检测临床标本和PM细胞系中预后模型基因mRNA表达水平。使用来自TCGA和基因型组织表达(GTEx)项目数据库的样本进行预后模型中的基因表达验证。利用阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校癌症数据分析门户(UALCAN)数据库探索预后模型中基因的表达模式。最后,对预后模型中的基因进行基因集富集分析(GSEA),探索其潜在的生物学功能和信号通路。结果:构建了由泛素样带PHD和环指结构域1 (UHRF1)、激酶家族成员4A (KIF4A)和never in有丝分裂基因A相关激酶2 (NEK2) 3个基因组成的预后风险评估模型。预后模型的风险评分计算公式为:风险评分= UHRF1表达水平× 1.4525 - KIF4A表达水平× 1.3270 + NEK2表达水平× 1.4167。在这个最佳临界值上,患者被进一步分为高危组和低危组。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,与高危组患者相比,低危组患者的总生存期明显延长。结论:三个预后标记基因(UHRF1、KIF4A和NEK2)作为一个基因簇可能作为PM的预后标记基因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of a novel prognostic gene signature in pleural mesothelioma: a study based on The Cancer Genome Atlas database and experimental validation.

Background: Early detection and prognostic prediction are crucial in improving the survival of patients with pleural mesothelioma (PM). Therefore, this study aimed to develop a gene prognostic risk model for PM patients based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database analysis and experimental validations.

Methods: Obtaining gene expression data and clinical information of PM from the TCGA database, the dataset was divided into a training set and a testing set. Univariate Cox regression analysis, robust testing, and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed on the training set to establish a prognostic risk model. Risk scores were calculated for each patient, and the dataset was stratified into high- and low-risk groups. The predictive efficacy and accuracy of the model were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of genes in the prognostic model in clinical samples and PM cell lines were detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Gene expression validation in the prognostic model was conducted using samples from the TCGA and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project databases. The University of ALabama at birmingham CANcer data analysis portal (UALCAN) database was utilized to explore the expression patterns of genes in the prognostic model. Finally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on genes in the prognostic model to explore their potential biological functions and signaling pathways.

Results: A prognostic risk assessment model consisting of three genes, ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domain 1 (UHRF1), kinesin family member 4A (KIF4A), and never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 2 (NEK2) was constructed. The risk score of the prognostic model is calculated as follows: risk score = Expression level of UHRF1 × 1.4525 - Expression level of KIF4A × 1.3270 + Expression level of NEK2 × 1.4167. Patients were further stratified into high- and low-risk groups at this optimal cutoff point. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrate that, compared to patients in the high-risk group, those in the low-risk group exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival. Visualization of the model through a forest plot revealed a Log-Rank P<0.0001 for the entire model, indicating its potential as an independent prognostic marker for PM. The mRNA expression levels of three genes in the prognostic model significantly elevated in tumor samples and PM cell lines than in non-tumorigenic tissues and cell lines as detected by qRT-PCR. Additionally, these genes exhibited significant differences in expression among PM patients of different stages, tumor subtypes, ages, and metastatic statuses. The overexpressed group of these three genes was significantly enriched in pathways such as DNA replication, mRNA surveillance pathway, nuclear transport, ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes, and spliceosome pathways.

Conclusions: Three prognostic marker genes (UHRF1, KIF4A, and NEK2) as a gene cluster may serve as prognostic marker genes in PM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信