类风湿性关节炎患者甲氨蝶呤不耐受的给药频率和给药途径相关因素:一项横断面研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986251349449
Haya M Almalag, Jawza F Alsabhan, Abdurhman S Alarfaj, Eman Alfi, Shorouq Albalawi, Asma A Al-Shadaawi, Sahar A Alshehri, Ghadah Asaad Assiri, Ibrahim Almaghlouth, Mohammed A Omair
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎患者甲氨蝶呤不耐受的给药频率和给药途径相关因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Haya M Almalag, Jawza F Alsabhan, Abdurhman S Alarfaj, Eman Alfi, Shorouq Albalawi, Asma A Al-Shadaawi, Sahar A Alshehri, Ghadah Asaad Assiri, Ibrahim Almaghlouth, Mohammed A Omair","doi":"10.1177/20420986251349449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methotrexate is central to the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, its use is often limited by methotrexate intolerance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to explore the association between alternative methotrexate dosing methods and methotrexate intolerance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted on patients with RA receiving methotrexate for at least 3 months at the outpatient clinic of King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The electronic survey collected data on demographics, marital and educational status, methotrexate use, Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS), and Health Assessment Questionnaire. Statistical analyses (univariate and linear or logistic regression) were conducted to evaluate the associations between the administration methods and methotrexate intolerance (MISS ⩾6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 154 patients, predominantly female (89%; mean age (standard deviation, ±SD): 50 (±12) years). Methotrexate tolerance was observed in 64% of the participants, while 36% had a MISS above the cutoff point of 6, indicating intolerance. Methotrexate-intolerant patients were younger (mean age (±SD): 47 (±12) years) than tolerant patients (mean age (±SD): 54 (±12) years; <i>p</i> = 0.005). No significant differences were found between methotrexate-tolerant and methotrexate-intolerant patients regarding dose, frequency, relation to meals, and time of day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methotrexate tolerance was not associated with different administration methods: split-dose versus single weekly dose, or subcutaneous versus oral administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251349449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors related to dosing frequency and route of administration in methotrexate intolerance among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Haya M Almalag, Jawza F Alsabhan, Abdurhman S Alarfaj, Eman Alfi, Shorouq Albalawi, Asma A Al-Shadaawi, Sahar A Alshehri, Ghadah Asaad Assiri, Ibrahim Almaghlouth, Mohammed A Omair\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420986251349449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methotrexate is central to the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, its use is often limited by methotrexate intolerance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to explore the association between alternative methotrexate dosing methods and methotrexate intolerance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted on patients with RA receiving methotrexate for at least 3 months at the outpatient clinic of King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The electronic survey collected data on demographics, marital and educational status, methotrexate use, Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS), and Health Assessment Questionnaire. Statistical analyses (univariate and linear or logistic regression) were conducted to evaluate the associations between the administration methods and methotrexate intolerance (MISS ⩾6).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 154 patients, predominantly female (89%; mean age (standard deviation, ±SD): 50 (±12) years). Methotrexate tolerance was observed in 64% of the participants, while 36% had a MISS above the cutoff point of 6, indicating intolerance. Methotrexate-intolerant patients were younger (mean age (±SD): 47 (±12) years) than tolerant patients (mean age (±SD): 54 (±12) years; <i>p</i> = 0.005). No significant differences were found between methotrexate-tolerant and methotrexate-intolerant patients regarding dose, frequency, relation to meals, and time of day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Methotrexate tolerance was not associated with different administration methods: split-dose versus single weekly dose, or subcutaneous versus oral administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20420986251349449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171254/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251349449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251349449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:甲氨蝶呤是类风湿关节炎(RA)治疗的核心。然而,它的使用往往受到甲氨蝶呤不耐受的限制。目的:本研究旨在探讨甲氨蝶呤替代给药方法与甲氨蝶呤不耐受之间的关系。设计:横断面研究。方法:对沙特阿拉伯利雅得沙特国王大学医学城门诊接受甲氨蝶呤治疗至少3个月的RA患者进行横断面调查。电子调查收集了人口统计、婚姻和教育状况、甲氨蝶呤使用情况、甲氨蝶呤不耐受严重程度评分(MISS)和健康评估问卷的数据。进行统计分析(单变量和线性或逻辑回归)以评估给药方法和甲氨蝶呤不耐受(MISS大于或小于6)之间的关联。结果:研究纳入154例患者,主要为女性(89%;平均年龄(标准差,±SD): 50(±12)岁。在64%的参与者中观察到甲氨蝶呤耐受,而36%的参与者的MISS高于临界值6,表明不耐受。甲氨蝶呤不耐受患者比耐受患者年轻(平均年龄(±SD): 47(±12)岁)(平均年龄(±SD): 54(±12)岁;p = 0.005)。甲氨蝶呤耐受和甲氨蝶呤不耐受患者在剂量、频率、与膳食的关系和一天的时间方面没有发现显著差异。结论:甲氨蝶呤耐受性与不同给药方式无关:分次给药与单周给药,皮下给药与口服给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors related to dosing frequency and route of administration in methotrexate intolerance among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Methotrexate is central to the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, its use is often limited by methotrexate intolerance.

Objectives: This study aims to explore the association between alternative methotrexate dosing methods and methotrexate intolerance.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on patients with RA receiving methotrexate for at least 3 months at the outpatient clinic of King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The electronic survey collected data on demographics, marital and educational status, methotrexate use, Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS), and Health Assessment Questionnaire. Statistical analyses (univariate and linear or logistic regression) were conducted to evaluate the associations between the administration methods and methotrexate intolerance (MISS ⩾6).

Results: The study included 154 patients, predominantly female (89%; mean age (standard deviation, ±SD): 50 (±12) years). Methotrexate tolerance was observed in 64% of the participants, while 36% had a MISS above the cutoff point of 6, indicating intolerance. Methotrexate-intolerant patients were younger (mean age (±SD): 47 (±12) years) than tolerant patients (mean age (±SD): 54 (±12) years; p = 0.005). No significant differences were found between methotrexate-tolerant and methotrexate-intolerant patients regarding dose, frequency, relation to meals, and time of day.

Conclusion: Methotrexate tolerance was not associated with different administration methods: split-dose versus single weekly dose, or subcutaneous versus oral administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信