Sherry L. Ralston , Li Li , Donna Lee , Darcey Clark , Andrew Dropsey , Haley Neff-LaFord , Payal Rana , Lucinda Weir , Radhakrishna Sura , Natalie Waterhouse
{"title":"减少使用非人类灵长类动物开发具有细胞毒性有效载荷的肿瘤adc的策略。","authors":"Sherry L. Ralston , Li Li , Donna Lee , Darcey Clark , Andrew Dropsey , Haley Neff-LaFord , Payal Rana , Lucinda Weir , Radhakrishna Sura , Natalie Waterhouse","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of non-human primates (NHP) for the nonclinical development of biologics can be necessary to assess the potential safety risks in humans. An IQ DruSafe and 3Rs TPS Working Group (WG) conducted a survey on the use of NHP in toxicology studies used to develop antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) with cytotoxic payloads for oncology treatment. The survey addressed whether a Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) 3-month NHP study provides additional safety information relative to the 1-month GLP NHP or relative to the 3-month GLP rodent study. Questions from the survey included whether a 3-month NHP study was conducted and if so, were the results similar or not to the 3-month rodent study or the 1-month NHP study, if the toxicities observed were consistent with the expected toxicities of the ADC payload, and whether the toxicities translated to that observed in the clinic. In addition, survey questions addressed study design elements particularly related to the number of animals used in studies. Survey results indicated that target organ toxicities were generally similar between studies, were translatable to humans, and most were attributed to the payload. Overall, the survey results support opportunities to reduce NHP use in the development of ADCs with cytotoxic payloads in oncology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies to reduce the use of non-human primates in development of oncology ADCs with cytotoxic payloads\",\"authors\":\"Sherry L. Ralston , Li Li , Donna Lee , Darcey Clark , Andrew Dropsey , Haley Neff-LaFord , Payal Rana , Lucinda Weir , Radhakrishna Sura , Natalie Waterhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of non-human primates (NHP) for the nonclinical development of biologics can be necessary to assess the potential safety risks in humans. An IQ DruSafe and 3Rs TPS Working Group (WG) conducted a survey on the use of NHP in toxicology studies used to develop antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) with cytotoxic payloads for oncology treatment. The survey addressed whether a Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) 3-month NHP study provides additional safety information relative to the 1-month GLP NHP or relative to the 3-month GLP rodent study. Questions from the survey included whether a 3-month NHP study was conducted and if so, were the results similar or not to the 3-month rodent study or the 1-month NHP study, if the toxicities observed were consistent with the expected toxicities of the ADC payload, and whether the toxicities translated to that observed in the clinic. In addition, survey questions addressed study design elements particularly related to the number of animals used in studies. Survey results indicated that target organ toxicities were generally similar between studies, were translatable to humans, and most were attributed to the payload. Overall, the survey results support opportunities to reduce NHP use in the development of ADCs with cytotoxic payloads in oncology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategies to reduce the use of non-human primates in development of oncology ADCs with cytotoxic payloads
The use of non-human primates (NHP) for the nonclinical development of biologics can be necessary to assess the potential safety risks in humans. An IQ DruSafe and 3Rs TPS Working Group (WG) conducted a survey on the use of NHP in toxicology studies used to develop antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) with cytotoxic payloads for oncology treatment. The survey addressed whether a Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) 3-month NHP study provides additional safety information relative to the 1-month GLP NHP or relative to the 3-month GLP rodent study. Questions from the survey included whether a 3-month NHP study was conducted and if so, were the results similar or not to the 3-month rodent study or the 1-month NHP study, if the toxicities observed were consistent with the expected toxicities of the ADC payload, and whether the toxicities translated to that observed in the clinic. In addition, survey questions addressed study design elements particularly related to the number of animals used in studies. Survey results indicated that target organ toxicities were generally similar between studies, were translatable to humans, and most were attributed to the payload. Overall, the survey results support opportunities to reduce NHP use in the development of ADCs with cytotoxic payloads in oncology.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)