影响澳大利亚初级保健提供药物流产服务的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Greta Skahill, Mridula Shankar
{"title":"影响澳大利亚初级保健提供药物流产服务的因素:一项混合方法系统评价。","authors":"Greta Skahill,&nbsp;Mridula Shankar","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To synthesise primary research findings about factors that affect medical abortion provision by general practitioners, nurses, midwives, and pharmacists in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Mixed methods systematic review of peer-reviewed primary publications of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies of the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care, 1 January 2013 – 18 January 2025.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources</h3>\n \n <p>MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data synthesis</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three publications satisfied our inclusion criteria. We undertook a thematic synthesis of the qualitative study findings to identify barriers and facilitators of medical abortion provision, and assessed the confidence of each review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach; we also compared the qualitative synthesis with quantitative study findings. We developed ten review findings grouped under three themes: moral, legal, and regulatory influences on abortion care (three review findings; very low to moderate confidence); the absence of a systems-based approach to abortion provision (six review findings; moderate to high confidence); and early medical abortion belongs in primary care (one review finding; high confidence). Barriers to providing medical abortion include the absence of a supportive service delivery strategy, insufficient Medicare remuneration, geographic isolation, limited access to training, and colleagues who conscientiously object to abortion. Facilitators of its provision include clinician support networks and personal motivation to improve access to reproductive health care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A range of individual, service level, and system factors exacerbate the effects of geographic location and financial considerations on the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care. Our findings indicate that financial and structural support is needed for the geographic decentralisation of medical abortion training and services, the establishment of nurse-led models of care, and the integration of abortion care into primary care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"223 2","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52707","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that affect the provision of medical abortion services in Australian primary care: a mixed methods systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Greta Skahill,&nbsp;Mridula Shankar\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To synthesise primary research findings about factors that affect medical abortion provision by general practitioners, nurses, midwives, and pharmacists in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mixed methods systematic review of peer-reviewed primary publications of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies of the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care, 1 January 2013 – 18 January 2025.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data synthesis</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-three publications satisfied our inclusion criteria. We undertook a thematic synthesis of the qualitative study findings to identify barriers and facilitators of medical abortion provision, and assessed the confidence of each review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach; we also compared the qualitative synthesis with quantitative study findings. We developed ten review findings grouped under three themes: moral, legal, and regulatory influences on abortion care (three review findings; very low to moderate confidence); the absence of a systems-based approach to abortion provision (six review findings; moderate to high confidence); and early medical abortion belongs in primary care (one review finding; high confidence). Barriers to providing medical abortion include the absence of a supportive service delivery strategy, insufficient Medicare remuneration, geographic isolation, limited access to training, and colleagues who conscientiously object to abortion. Facilitators of its provision include clinician support networks and personal motivation to improve access to reproductive health care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>A range of individual, service level, and system factors exacerbate the effects of geographic location and financial considerations on the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care. Our findings indicate that financial and structural support is needed for the geographic decentralisation of medical abortion training and services, the establishment of nurse-led models of care, and the integration of abortion care into primary care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"223 2\",\"pages\":\"101-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52707\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52707\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:综合澳大利亚全科医生、护士、助产士和药剂师提供药物流产服务的影响因素的初步研究结果。研究设计:对2013年1月1日至2025年1月18日澳大利亚初级保健中提供药物流产的定性、定量和混合方法研究的同行评议的主要出版物进行混合方法系统评价。数据来源:MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL(护理和相关健康文献累积索引)。数据综合:23篇出版物符合我们的纳入标准。我们对定性研究结果进行了专题综合,以确定提供药物流产的障碍和促进因素,并使用GRADE-CERQual方法评估了每项审查结果的可信度;我们还比较了定性综合和定量研究结果。我们根据三个主题总结了十项综述结果:道德、法律和监管对堕胎护理的影响(三项综述结果;非常低到中等置信度);缺乏以系统为基础的堕胎提供方法(六项审查结果;中高置信度);早期药物流产属于初级保健(一项综述发现;高信心)。提供药物流产的障碍包括:缺乏支持性服务提供战略、医疗保险报酬不足、地理隔离、获得培训的机会有限以及同事自觉反对流产。促进其提供的因素包括临床医生支助网络和改善获得生殖保健机会的个人动机。结论:一系列个人、服务水平和系统因素加剧了地理位置和财务考虑对澳大利亚初级保健提供药物流产的影响。我们的研究结果表明,医疗流产培训和服务的地理分散,建立护士主导的护理模式,以及将流产护理纳入初级保健需要财政和结构支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors that affect the provision of medical abortion services in Australian primary care: a mixed methods systematic review

Factors that affect the provision of medical abortion services in Australian primary care: a mixed methods systematic review

Objectives

To synthesise primary research findings about factors that affect medical abortion provision by general practitioners, nurses, midwives, and pharmacists in Australia.

Study design

Mixed methods systematic review of peer-reviewed primary publications of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies of the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care, 1 January 2013 – 18 January 2025.

Data sources

MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature).

Data synthesis

Twenty-three publications satisfied our inclusion criteria. We undertook a thematic synthesis of the qualitative study findings to identify barriers and facilitators of medical abortion provision, and assessed the confidence of each review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach; we also compared the qualitative synthesis with quantitative study findings. We developed ten review findings grouped under three themes: moral, legal, and regulatory influences on abortion care (three review findings; very low to moderate confidence); the absence of a systems-based approach to abortion provision (six review findings; moderate to high confidence); and early medical abortion belongs in primary care (one review finding; high confidence). Barriers to providing medical abortion include the absence of a supportive service delivery strategy, insufficient Medicare remuneration, geographic isolation, limited access to training, and colleagues who conscientiously object to abortion. Facilitators of its provision include clinician support networks and personal motivation to improve access to reproductive health care.

Conclusions

A range of individual, service level, and system factors exacerbate the effects of geographic location and financial considerations on the provision of medical abortion in Australian primary care. Our findings indicate that financial and structural support is needed for the geographic decentralisation of medical abortion training and services, the establishment of nurse-led models of care, and the integration of abortion care into primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信