湿润伤口愈合和共熔局麻膏膏用于清洁扣眼插管:一种减少感染的策略。

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000864
Kazuhiko Shibata, Shigeki Toma, Shigeru Nakai, Masumi Yamamoto, Koichi Tamura
{"title":"湿润伤口愈合和共熔局麻膏膏用于清洁扣眼插管:一种减少感染的策略。","authors":"Kazuhiko Shibata, Shigeki Toma, Shigeru Nakai, Masumi Yamamoto, Koichi Tamura","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The buttonhole cannulation technique is recognized for its advantages in hemodialysis, including reduced cannulation errors, decreased pain, and prevention of hematoma formation. However, it has been criticized for possibly increasing the risk of local and systemic infections, including sepsis and death. Prior studies have shown the infection risks associated with the buttonhole technique compared with the rope ladder technique, but the role of scab removal methods at the puncture site has been overlooked. The clean buttonhole method was developed based on softening and removing buttonhole scabs with liquid soap in home hemodialysis, incorporating moist wound-healing treatment, thorough washing, and eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream to efficiently eliminate scabs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis at Toshin Clinic in Yokohama, Japan, from June 2020 to July 2024. Infection rates were documented in both the clean buttonhole and sharp needle groups. Statistical tests were used to compare the incidence of local infections between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33,137 punctures performed using the clean buttonhole technique, only one localized infection was reported, characterized by mild redness without pain. In contrast, the sharp needle group experienced multiple infections with the rope ladder technique. The local infection rate was 0.030 cases per 1,000 punctures in the clean buttonhole group compared to 0.025 cases per 1,000 punctures in the sharp needle group, with no statistically significant difference observed (p = 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clean buttonhole method demonstrates a comparable infection risk profile to traditional sharp needle techniques. These findings indicate that this method may enhance patient safety and comfort in hemodialysis. Further research with larger, multicenter populations is needed to validate these results and assess broader applications in various clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moist Wound Healing and Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics Cream for Clean Buttonhole Cannulation: An Infection Reduction Strategy.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhiko Shibata, Shigeki Toma, Shigeru Nakai, Masumi Yamamoto, Koichi Tamura\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The buttonhole cannulation technique is recognized for its advantages in hemodialysis, including reduced cannulation errors, decreased pain, and prevention of hematoma formation. However, it has been criticized for possibly increasing the risk of local and systemic infections, including sepsis and death. Prior studies have shown the infection risks associated with the buttonhole technique compared with the rope ladder technique, but the role of scab removal methods at the puncture site has been overlooked. The clean buttonhole method was developed based on softening and removing buttonhole scabs with liquid soap in home hemodialysis, incorporating moist wound-healing treatment, thorough washing, and eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream to efficiently eliminate scabs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis at Toshin Clinic in Yokohama, Japan, from June 2020 to July 2024. Infection rates were documented in both the clean buttonhole and sharp needle groups. Statistical tests were used to compare the incidence of local infections between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 33,137 punctures performed using the clean buttonhole technique, only one localized infection was reported, characterized by mild redness without pain. In contrast, the sharp needle group experienced multiple infections with the rope ladder technique. The local infection rate was 0.030 cases per 1,000 punctures in the clean buttonhole group compared to 0.025 cases per 1,000 punctures in the sharp needle group, with no statistically significant difference observed (p = 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clean buttonhole method demonstrates a comparable infection risk profile to traditional sharp needle techniques. These findings indicate that this method may enhance patient safety and comfort in hemodialysis. Further research with larger, multicenter populations is needed to validate these results and assess broader applications in various clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:扣眼穿刺技术在血液透析中的优势是公认的,包括减少穿刺错误、减轻疼痛和预防血肿形成。然而,有人批评它可能增加局部和全身感染的风险,包括败血症和死亡。先前的研究表明,与绳梯技术相比,扣眼技术具有感染风险,但在穿刺部位清除结痂的方法的作用被忽视了。清洁扣眼法是基于家庭血液透析中使用液体肥皂软化和去除扣眼结痂的方法,结合湿润创面愈合处理、彻底清洗、局麻膏共溶混合,有效消除结痂。方法:这项观察性研究包括2020年6月至2024年7月在日本横滨Toshin诊所接受维护性血液透析的患者。记录了干净的扣眼组和锋利的针眼组的感染率。采用统计学检验比较两组间局部感染发生率。结果:在使用干净扣眼技术进行的33,137次穿刺中,仅报告了1例局部感染,其特征是轻度红肿,无痛。相比之下,尖针组在绳梯技术下出现了多次感染。干净扣眼组局部感染率为0.030例/ 1000次,而尖针组为0.025例/ 1000次,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.86)。结论:清洁扣眼法与传统的尖针技术具有相当的感染风险。这些结果表明,这种方法可以提高患者在血液透析中的安全性和舒适性。需要在更大的、多中心的人群中进行进一步的研究来验证这些结果,并评估在各种临床环境中的更广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moist Wound Healing and Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics Cream for Clean Buttonhole Cannulation: An Infection Reduction Strategy.

Background: The buttonhole cannulation technique is recognized for its advantages in hemodialysis, including reduced cannulation errors, decreased pain, and prevention of hematoma formation. However, it has been criticized for possibly increasing the risk of local and systemic infections, including sepsis and death. Prior studies have shown the infection risks associated with the buttonhole technique compared with the rope ladder technique, but the role of scab removal methods at the puncture site has been overlooked. The clean buttonhole method was developed based on softening and removing buttonhole scabs with liquid soap in home hemodialysis, incorporating moist wound-healing treatment, thorough washing, and eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream to efficiently eliminate scabs.

Methods: This observational study included patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis at Toshin Clinic in Yokohama, Japan, from June 2020 to July 2024. Infection rates were documented in both the clean buttonhole and sharp needle groups. Statistical tests were used to compare the incidence of local infections between the groups.

Results: Among 33,137 punctures performed using the clean buttonhole technique, only one localized infection was reported, characterized by mild redness without pain. In contrast, the sharp needle group experienced multiple infections with the rope ladder technique. The local infection rate was 0.030 cases per 1,000 punctures in the clean buttonhole group compared to 0.025 cases per 1,000 punctures in the sharp needle group, with no statistically significant difference observed (p = 0.86).

Conclusions: The clean buttonhole method demonstrates a comparable infection risk profile to traditional sharp needle techniques. These findings indicate that this method may enhance patient safety and comfort in hemodialysis. Further research with larger, multicenter populations is needed to validate these results and assess broader applications in various clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信