Arianna Manunza, Paolo Cozzi, Paul Boettcher, Ino Curik, Christian Looft, Licia Colli, Johann Sölkner, Gábor Mészáros, Alessandra Stella
{"title":"估计最佳样本数量以确定牲畜的有效种群大小。","authors":"Arianna Manunza, Paolo Cozzi, Paul Boettcher, Ino Curik, Christian Looft, Licia Colli, Johann Sölkner, Gábor Mészáros, Alessandra Stella","doi":"10.3389/fgene.2025.1588986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective population size (<i>Ne</i>) is a key parameter in various biological disciplines, including evolutionary biology, conservation genetics, and livestock breeding programs. When applying genomic approaches to estimate <i>Ne</i> or other indicators of genetic variation, sample size is among the critical factors that directly affect the balance between cost and precision. In this study, we investigated the impact of sample size on <i>Ne</i> estimates by analyzing data from previous genotyping studies and simulations. Our results suggest that a sample size of 50 animals is a reasonable approximation of the \"true\" (\"unbiased\") <i>Ne</i> value within the populations analyzed. While estimating the <i>Ne</i> value is an important starting point in population genetics, additional factors, such as the degree of inbreeding, population structure, and admixture, must be taken into account to obtain a comprehensive genetic evaluation and avoid misinterpretation. We conclude that linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based approaches are well suited for the estimation of <i>Ne</i> in livestock populations. However, careful interpretation of results is essential as current bioinformatics tools may introduce potential biases due to methodological assumptions, marker density, or population-specific factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12750,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Genetics","volume":"16 ","pages":"1588986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the optimal number of samples to determine the effective population size in livestock.\",\"authors\":\"Arianna Manunza, Paolo Cozzi, Paul Boettcher, Ino Curik, Christian Looft, Licia Colli, Johann Sölkner, Gábor Mészáros, Alessandra Stella\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgene.2025.1588986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective population size (<i>Ne</i>) is a key parameter in various biological disciplines, including evolutionary biology, conservation genetics, and livestock breeding programs. When applying genomic approaches to estimate <i>Ne</i> or other indicators of genetic variation, sample size is among the critical factors that directly affect the balance between cost and precision. In this study, we investigated the impact of sample size on <i>Ne</i> estimates by analyzing data from previous genotyping studies and simulations. Our results suggest that a sample size of 50 animals is a reasonable approximation of the \\\"true\\\" (\\\"unbiased\\\") <i>Ne</i> value within the populations analyzed. While estimating the <i>Ne</i> value is an important starting point in population genetics, additional factors, such as the degree of inbreeding, population structure, and admixture, must be taken into account to obtain a comprehensive genetic evaluation and avoid misinterpretation. We conclude that linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based approaches are well suited for the estimation of <i>Ne</i> in livestock populations. However, careful interpretation of results is essential as current bioinformatics tools may introduce potential biases due to methodological assumptions, marker density, or population-specific factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Genetics\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1588986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170570/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1588986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1588986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating the optimal number of samples to determine the effective population size in livestock.
Effective population size (Ne) is a key parameter in various biological disciplines, including evolutionary biology, conservation genetics, and livestock breeding programs. When applying genomic approaches to estimate Ne or other indicators of genetic variation, sample size is among the critical factors that directly affect the balance between cost and precision. In this study, we investigated the impact of sample size on Ne estimates by analyzing data from previous genotyping studies and simulations. Our results suggest that a sample size of 50 animals is a reasonable approximation of the "true" ("unbiased") Ne value within the populations analyzed. While estimating the Ne value is an important starting point in population genetics, additional factors, such as the degree of inbreeding, population structure, and admixture, must be taken into account to obtain a comprehensive genetic evaluation and avoid misinterpretation. We conclude that linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based approaches are well suited for the estimation of Ne in livestock populations. However, careful interpretation of results is essential as current bioinformatics tools may introduce potential biases due to methodological assumptions, marker density, or population-specific factors.
Frontiers in GeneticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
3491
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Genetics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on genes and genomes relating to all the domains of life, from humans to plants to livestock and other model organisms. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of the world’s leading experts, this multidisciplinary, open-access journal is at the forefront of communicating cutting-edge research to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public.
The study of inheritance and the impact of the genome on various biological processes is well documented. However, the majority of discoveries are still to come. A new era is seeing major developments in the function and variability of the genome, the use of genetic and genomic tools and the analysis of the genetic basis of various biological phenomena.