使用大血管闭塞警报提高农村初级中风中心的室内室外时间:一项质量改进项目。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Austin Cannoy, Brittany Liberati, Christopher Berry
{"title":"使用大血管闭塞警报提高农村初级中风中心的室内室外时间:一项质量改进项目。","authors":"Austin Cannoy, Brittany Liberati, Christopher Berry","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombectomy is the primary treatment in the management of acute large vessel occlusions (LVO) strokes; however, many rural hospitals are not able to perform this procedure and must transfer patients to thrombectomy-capable centres expeditiously. This quality improvement initiative was aimed at optimising the door-in-door-out (DIDO) time for patients with stroke at a rural primary stroke centre in the USA, with a specific goal of DIDO time of <90 min, 50% of the time and <120 min, 75% of the time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>System inefficiencies in serial event processing, radiology interpretation, teleneurology application and activation of transferring emergency medical services were identified. We implemented several system changes using multiple plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. The final implementation was an LVO-Alert process, which incorporated prehospital alert based on an LVO scale, parallel event processing of emergency medicine, teleneurology and radiology activities, as well as early dispatch of Emergency Medical Services transfer resources. Two years premetrics and 1 year postmetrics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We saw change on the fifth PDSA cycle, in which we implemented the LVO-Alert. For all LVO transfers, the group for whom the LVO-Alert was used (n=21) demonstrated decreased mean DIDO times compared with the no LVO-Alert group (n=20): 103.7 min, SD=49.6 vs 167.9 min, SD=64. Pre-LVO-Alert implementation, 20% of LVO patients had DIDO times <120 min and 5% had times <90 min. Post-LVO-Alert, 76% of LVO patients had DIDO times <120 min and 52% had times <90 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of a parallel process bundle of care model, with early activation from a prehospital positive LVO scale, improved DIDO time in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing door-in-door-out time in a rural primary stroke centre using a large vessel occlusion alert: a quality improvement project.\",\"authors\":\"Austin Cannoy, Brittany Liberati, Christopher Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-214263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thrombectomy is the primary treatment in the management of acute large vessel occlusions (LVO) strokes; however, many rural hospitals are not able to perform this procedure and must transfer patients to thrombectomy-capable centres expeditiously. This quality improvement initiative was aimed at optimising the door-in-door-out (DIDO) time for patients with stroke at a rural primary stroke centre in the USA, with a specific goal of DIDO time of <90 min, 50% of the time and <120 min, 75% of the time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>System inefficiencies in serial event processing, radiology interpretation, teleneurology application and activation of transferring emergency medical services were identified. We implemented several system changes using multiple plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. The final implementation was an LVO-Alert process, which incorporated prehospital alert based on an LVO scale, parallel event processing of emergency medicine, teleneurology and radiology activities, as well as early dispatch of Emergency Medical Services transfer resources. Two years premetrics and 1 year postmetrics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We saw change on the fifth PDSA cycle, in which we implemented the LVO-Alert. For all LVO transfers, the group for whom the LVO-Alert was used (n=21) demonstrated decreased mean DIDO times compared with the no LVO-Alert group (n=20): 103.7 min, SD=49.6 vs 167.9 min, SD=64. Pre-LVO-Alert implementation, 20% of LVO patients had DIDO times <120 min and 5% had times <90 min. Post-LVO-Alert, 76% of LVO patients had DIDO times <120 min and 52% had times <90 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of a parallel process bundle of care model, with early activation from a prehospital positive LVO scale, improved DIDO time in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血栓切除术是治疗急性大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中的主要治疗方法;然而,许多农村医院没有能力进行这一手术,必须迅速将患者转移到有血栓切除术能力的中心。这项质量改进计划旨在优化美国农村初级卒中中心卒中患者的门内门外(DIDO)时间,其具体目标是方法的DIDO时间:确定了系列事件处理、放射学解释、远程神经学应用和转移紧急医疗服务的激活方面的系统效率低下。我们使用多个计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环实施了几个系统变更。最后实施的是LVO- alert流程,其中包括基于LVO规模的院前警报,急诊医学、远程神经病学和放射学活动的并行事件处理,以及急诊医疗服务转移资源的早期调度。比较2年的前期指标和1年的后期指标。结果:我们在第五个PDSA循环中看到了变化,其中我们实施了LVO-Alert。对于所有LVO转移,使用LVO- alert的组(n=21)与未使用LVO- alert的组(n=20)相比,平均DIDO时间减少:103.7 min, SD=49.6 vs 167.9 min, SD=64。结论:应用平行过程护理束模型,从院前LVO阳性量表早期激活,改善了该患者群体的DIDO时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing door-in-door-out time in a rural primary stroke centre using a large vessel occlusion alert: a quality improvement project.

Background: Thrombectomy is the primary treatment in the management of acute large vessel occlusions (LVO) strokes; however, many rural hospitals are not able to perform this procedure and must transfer patients to thrombectomy-capable centres expeditiously. This quality improvement initiative was aimed at optimising the door-in-door-out (DIDO) time for patients with stroke at a rural primary stroke centre in the USA, with a specific goal of DIDO time of <90 min, 50% of the time and <120 min, 75% of the time.

Methods: System inefficiencies in serial event processing, radiology interpretation, teleneurology application and activation of transferring emergency medical services were identified. We implemented several system changes using multiple plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. The final implementation was an LVO-Alert process, which incorporated prehospital alert based on an LVO scale, parallel event processing of emergency medicine, teleneurology and radiology activities, as well as early dispatch of Emergency Medical Services transfer resources. Two years premetrics and 1 year postmetrics were compared.

Results: We saw change on the fifth PDSA cycle, in which we implemented the LVO-Alert. For all LVO transfers, the group for whom the LVO-Alert was used (n=21) demonstrated decreased mean DIDO times compared with the no LVO-Alert group (n=20): 103.7 min, SD=49.6 vs 167.9 min, SD=64. Pre-LVO-Alert implementation, 20% of LVO patients had DIDO times <120 min and 5% had times <90 min. Post-LVO-Alert, 76% of LVO patients had DIDO times <120 min and 52% had times <90 min.

Conclusion: The application of a parallel process bundle of care model, with early activation from a prehospital positive LVO scale, improved DIDO time in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信