预测2型糖尿病患者胰高血糖素受体拮抗剂血糖控制的四种半机制模型的评价

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Austin Yue Feng Tan, Karen Schneck, Parag Garhyan, Eric Chun Yong Chan, Lai San Tham
{"title":"预测2型糖尿病患者胰高血糖素受体拮抗剂血糖控制的四种半机制模型的评价","authors":"Austin Yue Feng Tan, Karen Schneck, Parag Garhyan, Eric Chun Yong Chan, Lai San Tham","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the gold standard for measuring long-term glycemic efficacy over at least 3 months in Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Being able to predict HbA1c using glucose response from studies of less than 3 months would be useful. Four semi-mechanistic HbA1c models (ADOPT, FFH, FHH, and IGRH) were evaluated for their predictive performance of longer-term HbA1c at 24 weeks of treatment using glucose and HbA1c data up to 4 weeks of treatment. A novel glucagon receptor antagonist (LY2409021) was evaluated in T2D patients for glycemic control. The models were built using LY2409021 pharmacokinetics, glucose, and HbA1c data from a 4-week Phase 1b study. Predictive performance of the models was assessed based on comparing model-estimated and observed HbA1c values from a 24-week Phase 2b study. Metrics for predictive performance included: (a) mean change from baseline HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) at Week 24 between observed and simulated values; (b) mean prediction error (MPE) for bias; and (c) root mean squared error (RMSE) for precision. Overall, the FHH and IGRH models closely predicted the mean ΔHbA1c at Week 24 within 0.1% difference from the observed values in the Phase 2b study. Both models also had reasonable bias (absolute MPE < 0.1%) and precision (RMSE < 0.3%) estimates. Conversely, the ADOPT and FFH models over-predicted the mean reduction in HbA1c by 0.288% and 0.153%, respectively. The FHH and IGRH models featured transit compartments for modeling long delays between glucose and HbA1c. Thus, these models better represented the physiology and provided superior predictive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Four Semi-Mechanistic Models for Predicting Glycemic Control With a Glucagon Receptor Antagonist in People With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Austin Yue Feng Tan, Karen Schneck, Parag Garhyan, Eric Chun Yong Chan, Lai San Tham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.70058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the gold standard for measuring long-term glycemic efficacy over at least 3 months in Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Being able to predict HbA1c using glucose response from studies of less than 3 months would be useful. Four semi-mechanistic HbA1c models (ADOPT, FFH, FHH, and IGRH) were evaluated for their predictive performance of longer-term HbA1c at 24 weeks of treatment using glucose and HbA1c data up to 4 weeks of treatment. A novel glucagon receptor antagonist (LY2409021) was evaluated in T2D patients for glycemic control. The models were built using LY2409021 pharmacokinetics, glucose, and HbA1c data from a 4-week Phase 1b study. Predictive performance of the models was assessed based on comparing model-estimated and observed HbA1c values from a 24-week Phase 2b study. Metrics for predictive performance included: (a) mean change from baseline HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) at Week 24 between observed and simulated values; (b) mean prediction error (MPE) for bias; and (c) root mean squared error (RMSE) for precision. Overall, the FHH and IGRH models closely predicted the mean ΔHbA1c at Week 24 within 0.1% difference from the observed values in the Phase 2b study. Both models also had reasonable bias (absolute MPE < 0.1%) and precision (RMSE < 0.3%) estimates. Conversely, the ADOPT and FFH models over-predicted the mean reduction in HbA1c by 0.288% and 0.153%, respectively. The FHH and IGRH models featured transit compartments for modeling long delays between glucose and HbA1c. Thus, these models better represented the physiology and provided superior predictive performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是衡量2型糖尿病(T2D)至少3个月的长期血糖疗效的金标准。能够通过少于3个月的研究中的葡萄糖反应来预测HbA1c将是有用的。采用治疗前4周的血糖和HbA1c数据,评估了4种半机械性HbA1c模型(ADOPT、FFH、FHH和IGRH)在治疗24周时对长期HbA1c的预测性能。一种新型胰高血糖素受体拮抗剂(LY2409021)在t2dm患者中的血糖控制效果进行了评估。这些模型是根据LY2409021药代动力学、葡萄糖和HbA1c数据建立的,这些数据来自一项为期4周的1b期研究。通过比较24周2b期研究中模型估计和观察到的HbA1c值来评估模型的预测性能。预测性能的指标包括:(a)第24周观察值和模拟值之间基线HbA1c (ΔHbA1c)的平均变化;(b)偏倚的平均预测误差(MPE);(c)精度的均方根误差(RMSE)。总体而言,FHH和IGRH模型在第24周与2b期研究的观察值相差0.1%的范围内密切预测了平均值ΔHbA1c。两个模型也有合理的偏差(绝对MPE)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Four Semi-Mechanistic Models for Predicting Glycemic Control With a Glucagon Receptor Antagonist in People With Type 2 Diabetes.

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the gold standard for measuring long-term glycemic efficacy over at least 3 months in Type 2 diabetes (T2D). Being able to predict HbA1c using glucose response from studies of less than 3 months would be useful. Four semi-mechanistic HbA1c models (ADOPT, FFH, FHH, and IGRH) were evaluated for their predictive performance of longer-term HbA1c at 24 weeks of treatment using glucose and HbA1c data up to 4 weeks of treatment. A novel glucagon receptor antagonist (LY2409021) was evaluated in T2D patients for glycemic control. The models were built using LY2409021 pharmacokinetics, glucose, and HbA1c data from a 4-week Phase 1b study. Predictive performance of the models was assessed based on comparing model-estimated and observed HbA1c values from a 24-week Phase 2b study. Metrics for predictive performance included: (a) mean change from baseline HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) at Week 24 between observed and simulated values; (b) mean prediction error (MPE) for bias; and (c) root mean squared error (RMSE) for precision. Overall, the FHH and IGRH models closely predicted the mean ΔHbA1c at Week 24 within 0.1% difference from the observed values in the Phase 2b study. Both models also had reasonable bias (absolute MPE < 0.1%) and precision (RMSE < 0.3%) estimates. Conversely, the ADOPT and FFH models over-predicted the mean reduction in HbA1c by 0.288% and 0.153%, respectively. The FHH and IGRH models featured transit compartments for modeling long delays between glucose and HbA1c. Thus, these models better represented the physiology and provided superior predictive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信