工业标志隐喻类型对认知表现的影响及加工中的神经模式

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Lan Zhang , Xiaoli Wu , Biao Yan , Linyan Ren , Xiaoyang Mao
{"title":"工业标志隐喻类型对认知表现的影响及加工中的神经模式","authors":"Lan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Wu ,&nbsp;Biao Yan ,&nbsp;Linyan Ren ,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of intelligent manufacturing poses challenges to the presentation of industrial information, leading to a recent surge of interest in industrial icons. To explore the semantic understanding of industrial icons within the intelligent manufacturing field, this study conducted an event-related potential (ERP) investigation focusing on metaphorical types (object metaphor, structural metaphor) and semantic conditions (match, mismatch). The ERP components observed—N1, P200, N400, and P600—reflect different stages of cognitive processing. N1 represents an initial response to visual perception, P200 indicates early recognition of semantic violations, N400 is associated with semantic processing and integration, and P600 reflects a prolonged reanalysis process for semantic integration. The study found that object metaphor elicited larger amplitudes in P200 and a smaller N400 compared to structural metaphor, suggesting that object metaphor requires more attention resources and is less impacted by semantic violations. However, the amplitude of P600 showed no significant difference between the two metaphorical types. Behavioral results demonstrated that object metaphor had higher accuracy and shorter response times than structural metaphor, indicating superior cognitive performance for object metaphor. These findings propose a novel perspective on using ERP components (N1, P200, N400, P600) to gain a deeper understanding of industrial icons. This contributes to the study of metaphorical design and the semantic understanding of industrial icons in the intelligent manufacturing domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 103772"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metaphorical types of industrial icons: Impact on cognitive performance and the neural pattern in processing\",\"authors\":\"Lan Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Wu ,&nbsp;Biao Yan ,&nbsp;Linyan Ren ,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid development of intelligent manufacturing poses challenges to the presentation of industrial information, leading to a recent surge of interest in industrial icons. To explore the semantic understanding of industrial icons within the intelligent manufacturing field, this study conducted an event-related potential (ERP) investigation focusing on metaphorical types (object metaphor, structural metaphor) and semantic conditions (match, mismatch). The ERP components observed—N1, P200, N400, and P600—reflect different stages of cognitive processing. N1 represents an initial response to visual perception, P200 indicates early recognition of semantic violations, N400 is associated with semantic processing and integration, and P600 reflects a prolonged reanalysis process for semantic integration. The study found that object metaphor elicited larger amplitudes in P200 and a smaller N400 compared to structural metaphor, suggesting that object metaphor requires more attention resources and is less impacted by semantic violations. However, the amplitude of P600 showed no significant difference between the two metaphorical types. Behavioral results demonstrated that object metaphor had higher accuracy and shorter response times than structural metaphor, indicating superior cognitive performance for object metaphor. These findings propose a novel perspective on using ERP components (N1, P200, N400, P600) to gain a deeper understanding of industrial icons. This contributes to the study of metaphorical design and the semantic understanding of industrial icons in the intelligent manufacturing domain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000782\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智能制造的快速发展对工业信息的呈现提出了挑战,近年来人们对工业图标的兴趣激增。为探索智能制造领域工业图标的语义理解,本研究以隐喻类型(对象隐喻、结构隐喻)和语义条件(匹配、不匹配)为重点,开展了事件相关电位(ERP)调查。观察到的ERP成分n1、P200、N400和p600反映了认知加工的不同阶段。N1表示对视觉感知的初始反应,P200表示对语义违规的早期识别,N400与语义加工和整合相关,P600表示语义整合的再分析过程较长。研究发现,与结构隐喻相比,客体隐喻诱发的P200振幅较大,N400振幅较小,说明客体隐喻需要更多的注意资源,受语义违背的影响较小。而P600的振幅在两种隐喻类型间无显著差异。行为实验结果表明,客体隐喻比结构隐喻具有更高的准确性和更短的反应时间,表明客体隐喻具有更高的认知能力。这些发现提出了使用ERP组件(N1, P200, N400, P600)来更深入地理解工业图标的新视角。这有助于隐喻设计的研究和智能制造领域工业符号的语义理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metaphorical types of industrial icons: Impact on cognitive performance and the neural pattern in processing
The rapid development of intelligent manufacturing poses challenges to the presentation of industrial information, leading to a recent surge of interest in industrial icons. To explore the semantic understanding of industrial icons within the intelligent manufacturing field, this study conducted an event-related potential (ERP) investigation focusing on metaphorical types (object metaphor, structural metaphor) and semantic conditions (match, mismatch). The ERP components observed—N1, P200, N400, and P600—reflect different stages of cognitive processing. N1 represents an initial response to visual perception, P200 indicates early recognition of semantic violations, N400 is associated with semantic processing and integration, and P600 reflects a prolonged reanalysis process for semantic integration. The study found that object metaphor elicited larger amplitudes in P200 and a smaller N400 compared to structural metaphor, suggesting that object metaphor requires more attention resources and is less impacted by semantic violations. However, the amplitude of P600 showed no significant difference between the two metaphorical types. Behavioral results demonstrated that object metaphor had higher accuracy and shorter response times than structural metaphor, indicating superior cognitive performance for object metaphor. These findings propose a novel perspective on using ERP components (N1, P200, N400, P600) to gain a deeper understanding of industrial icons. This contributes to the study of metaphorical design and the semantic understanding of industrial icons in the intelligent manufacturing domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信