{"title":"第二语言学习中学生口头反馈的参与:方法论回顾","authors":"Jing Liu, Wei Su","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effectiveness of feedback and its impact on learning outcomes ultimately depend on whether and how students respond to feedback, that it, students' engagement with feedback. Research on this topic has received increasing scholarly attention. Compared to research on engagement with written feedback, less is known regarding how students engage with oral feedback. Given the real-time interactions between feedback givers and receivers enabled by oral feedback, coupled with multi-modality of visual and aural information exchanges, students' engagement with oral feedback is very likely to differ from that with written feedback. An investigation into this area can enhance the current understanding of engagement as a complex construct. Accordingly, this study systematically reviewed 40 empirical studies from a methodological perspective, since one possible reason for the limited attention to engagement with oral feedback is the difficulty of capturing and analyzing the highly transient oral delivery. The review found that most research did not provide clear or focused conceptualizations or theoretical frameworks of engagement. In addition, the most frequently adopted research design was the convergent design, the most frequent methods were surveys and observation, with the most common instruments being video/audio recordings and questionnaires. In response, it is suggested that, theoretically, more consensus should be reached concerning the terminology, theoretical frameworks, and conceptualizations. In terms of research foci, more efforts are needed to comprehensively explore the three dimensions of engagement (i.e., behavioral, cognitive, and affective), potential indicators, innovative methods, and engagement with alternative feedback types. Finally, the influencing factors in the engagement process (e.g., teaching contexts, feedback foci, learners’ motivation) merit special attention, since they are indispensable for a thorough comprehension of engagement with feedback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103752"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student engagement with oral feedback on second language learning: A methodological review\",\"authors\":\"Jing Liu, Wei Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2025.103752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The effectiveness of feedback and its impact on learning outcomes ultimately depend on whether and how students respond to feedback, that it, students' engagement with feedback. Research on this topic has received increasing scholarly attention. Compared to research on engagement with written feedback, less is known regarding how students engage with oral feedback. Given the real-time interactions between feedback givers and receivers enabled by oral feedback, coupled with multi-modality of visual and aural information exchanges, students' engagement with oral feedback is very likely to differ from that with written feedback. An investigation into this area can enhance the current understanding of engagement as a complex construct. Accordingly, this study systematically reviewed 40 empirical studies from a methodological perspective, since one possible reason for the limited attention to engagement with oral feedback is the difficulty of capturing and analyzing the highly transient oral delivery. The review found that most research did not provide clear or focused conceptualizations or theoretical frameworks of engagement. In addition, the most frequently adopted research design was the convergent design, the most frequent methods were surveys and observation, with the most common instruments being video/audio recordings and questionnaires. In response, it is suggested that, theoretically, more consensus should be reached concerning the terminology, theoretical frameworks, and conceptualizations. In terms of research foci, more efforts are needed to comprehensively explore the three dimensions of engagement (i.e., behavioral, cognitive, and affective), potential indicators, innovative methods, and engagement with alternative feedback types. Finally, the influencing factors in the engagement process (e.g., teaching contexts, feedback foci, learners’ motivation) merit special attention, since they are indispensable for a thorough comprehension of engagement with feedback.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001629\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001629","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Student engagement with oral feedback on second language learning: A methodological review
The effectiveness of feedback and its impact on learning outcomes ultimately depend on whether and how students respond to feedback, that it, students' engagement with feedback. Research on this topic has received increasing scholarly attention. Compared to research on engagement with written feedback, less is known regarding how students engage with oral feedback. Given the real-time interactions between feedback givers and receivers enabled by oral feedback, coupled with multi-modality of visual and aural information exchanges, students' engagement with oral feedback is very likely to differ from that with written feedback. An investigation into this area can enhance the current understanding of engagement as a complex construct. Accordingly, this study systematically reviewed 40 empirical studies from a methodological perspective, since one possible reason for the limited attention to engagement with oral feedback is the difficulty of capturing and analyzing the highly transient oral delivery. The review found that most research did not provide clear or focused conceptualizations or theoretical frameworks of engagement. In addition, the most frequently adopted research design was the convergent design, the most frequent methods were surveys and observation, with the most common instruments being video/audio recordings and questionnaires. In response, it is suggested that, theoretically, more consensus should be reached concerning the terminology, theoretical frameworks, and conceptualizations. In terms of research foci, more efforts are needed to comprehensively explore the three dimensions of engagement (i.e., behavioral, cognitive, and affective), potential indicators, innovative methods, and engagement with alternative feedback types. Finally, the influencing factors in the engagement process (e.g., teaching contexts, feedback foci, learners’ motivation) merit special attention, since they are indispensable for a thorough comprehension of engagement with feedback.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.