首次全髋关节置换术后90天再入院的机器学习预测:来自密歇根关节置换术登记处(MARCQI)的1340例分析

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Zachary Crespi , Usher Khan , Abdul-Lateef Shafau , Fong Nham , Chaoyang Chen , Bryan Little , Hussein Darwiche
{"title":"首次全髋关节置换术后90天再入院的机器学习预测:来自密歇根关节置换术登记处(MARCQI)的1340例分析","authors":"Zachary Crespi ,&nbsp;Usher Khan ,&nbsp;Abdul-Lateef Shafau ,&nbsp;Fong Nham ,&nbsp;Chaoyang Chen ,&nbsp;Bryan Little ,&nbsp;Hussein Darwiche","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ninety-day readmission after total hip arthroplasty (THA) drives cost and signals sub-optimal recovery, yet existing risk-stratification tools are imprecise. We aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning model to predict 90-day readmissions and to identify modifiable risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) was queried for all primary THAs performed between 2012 and 2023 at a single institution. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons. Demographics, comorbidities, peri-operative variables, and discharge dispositions were extracted. Univariate analyses compared patients readmitted within 90 days with those not readmitted. A multilayer perceptron neural network (MPNN) was trained on 70% of the cohort and tested on the remaining 30%. Model discrimination was assessed with area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), and variable importance was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,340 THA patients, 69 (5.1%) were readmitted within 90 days, with rates climbing from 0% in ASA I to 24% in ASA IV (p &lt; .001). Spearman correlations pinpointed length of stay (LOS) as the strongest readmission predictor (midnights ρ = 0.130; hours ρ = 0.123; both p &lt; .001), followed by discharge to post-acute care (ρ = −0.074; p = .007), smoking (ρ = 0.084; p = .002), and alcohol use (ρ = −0.072; p = .008). No other demographic or comorbidity variables reached significance.</div><div>An MPNN model achieved 94.7 % training accuracy, 95.2% testing accuracy, and an AUC of 0.71, ranking length of stay, ASA score, and bleeding disorders as its top three predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Prolonged hospital stays and higher ASA status are key drivers of 90-day readmission after THA. Integrating machine-learning risk stratification with strategies to shorten LOS, enhance preoperative optimization, and refine discharge planning may reduce readmission rates.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Prognostic Level III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Pages 270-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-learning prediction of 90-day readmission after primary total hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of 1,340 cases from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry (MARCQI)\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Crespi ,&nbsp;Usher Khan ,&nbsp;Abdul-Lateef Shafau ,&nbsp;Fong Nham ,&nbsp;Chaoyang Chen ,&nbsp;Bryan Little ,&nbsp;Hussein Darwiche\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jor.2025.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ninety-day readmission after total hip arthroplasty (THA) drives cost and signals sub-optimal recovery, yet existing risk-stratification tools are imprecise. We aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning model to predict 90-day readmissions and to identify modifiable risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) was queried for all primary THAs performed between 2012 and 2023 at a single institution. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons. Demographics, comorbidities, peri-operative variables, and discharge dispositions were extracted. Univariate analyses compared patients readmitted within 90 days with those not readmitted. A multilayer perceptron neural network (MPNN) was trained on 70% of the cohort and tested on the remaining 30%. Model discrimination was assessed with area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), and variable importance was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,340 THA patients, 69 (5.1%) were readmitted within 90 days, with rates climbing from 0% in ASA I to 24% in ASA IV (p &lt; .001). Spearman correlations pinpointed length of stay (LOS) as the strongest readmission predictor (midnights ρ = 0.130; hours ρ = 0.123; both p &lt; .001), followed by discharge to post-acute care (ρ = −0.074; p = .007), smoking (ρ = 0.084; p = .002), and alcohol use (ρ = −0.072; p = .008). No other demographic or comorbidity variables reached significance.</div><div>An MPNN model achieved 94.7 % training accuracy, 95.2% testing accuracy, and an AUC of 0.71, ranking length of stay, ASA score, and bleeding disorders as its top three predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Prolonged hospital stays and higher ASA status are key drivers of 90-day readmission after THA. Integrating machine-learning risk stratification with strategies to shorten LOS, enhance preoperative optimization, and refine discharge planning may reduce readmission rates.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Prognostic Level III.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 270-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全髋关节置换术(THA)后90天再入院会增加成本,并预示着恢复不佳,但现有的风险分层工具并不精确。我们的目标是开发和验证一个机器学习模型,以预测90天内的再入院情况,并确定可改变的风险因素。方法查询2012年至2023年间在单个机构进行的所有初级tha手术的密歇根关节成形术登记处协作质量倡议(MARCQI)。所有手术均由接受过奖学金培训的成人重建外科医生进行。提取了人口统计学、合并症、围手术期变量和出院处置。单因素分析比较了90天内再次入院的患者和未再次入院的患者。多层感知器神经网络(MPNN)在70%的队列上进行训练,并在剩余的30%上进行测试。用受试者-工作-特征曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型判别性,计算变量重要度。结果1340例THA患者中,69例(5.1%)在90天内再次入院,从ASA I的0%上升到ASA IV的24% (p <;措施)。Spearman相关性指出住院时间(LOS)是最强的再入院预测因子(午夜ρ = 0.130;ρ = 0.123;p <;.001),其次是出院至急性后护理(ρ = - 0.074;P = .007)、吸烟(ρ = 0.084;P = 0.002)和酒精使用(ρ = - 0.072;p = .008)。没有其他人口统计学或合并症变量达到显著性。MPNN模型的训练准确率为94.7%,测试准确率为95.2%,AUC为0.71,将住院时间、ASA评分和出血性疾病列为其前三大预测指标。结论延长住院时间和较高的ASA水平是THA术后90天再入院的关键因素。将机器学习风险分层与缩短LOS、加强术前优化和完善出院计划的策略相结合,可能会降低再入院率。证据水平:预后III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine-learning prediction of 90-day readmission after primary total hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of 1,340 cases from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry (MARCQI)

Background

Ninety-day readmission after total hip arthroplasty (THA) drives cost and signals sub-optimal recovery, yet existing risk-stratification tools are imprecise. We aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning model to predict 90-day readmissions and to identify modifiable risk factors.

Methods

The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) was queried for all primary THAs performed between 2012 and 2023 at a single institution. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons. Demographics, comorbidities, peri-operative variables, and discharge dispositions were extracted. Univariate analyses compared patients readmitted within 90 days with those not readmitted. A multilayer perceptron neural network (MPNN) was trained on 70% of the cohort and tested on the remaining 30%. Model discrimination was assessed with area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), and variable importance was calculated.

Results

Of 1,340 THA patients, 69 (5.1%) were readmitted within 90 days, with rates climbing from 0% in ASA I to 24% in ASA IV (p < .001). Spearman correlations pinpointed length of stay (LOS) as the strongest readmission predictor (midnights ρ = 0.130; hours ρ = 0.123; both p < .001), followed by discharge to post-acute care (ρ = −0.074; p = .007), smoking (ρ = 0.084; p = .002), and alcohol use (ρ = −0.072; p = .008). No other demographic or comorbidity variables reached significance.
An MPNN model achieved 94.7 % training accuracy, 95.2% testing accuracy, and an AUC of 0.71, ranking length of stay, ASA score, and bleeding disorders as its top three predictors.

Conclusion

Prolonged hospital stays and higher ASA status are key drivers of 90-day readmission after THA. Integrating machine-learning risk stratification with strategies to shorten LOS, enhance preoperative optimization, and refine discharge planning may reduce readmission rates.

Level of evidence

Prognostic Level III.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信