“Abura-politics”:加纳城市家庭自备供水基础设施的日常政治与谈判

IF 7 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Godfred Amankwaa , Kwame Asamoah Kwarteng , Edward Ampratwum
{"title":"“Abura-politics”:加纳城市家庭自备供水基础设施的日常政治与谈判","authors":"Godfred Amankwaa ,&nbsp;Kwame Asamoah Kwarteng ,&nbsp;Edward Ampratwum","doi":"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In most Global South cities, off-grid water infrastructures such as self-supplied household dug wells and private boreholes – as alternatives or responses to limited centralised ones – have become important water sources, particularly sustaining underserved urban settlements. However, given their construction within privately held plots, reliance on these water infrastructures reveals complex <em>politics</em> and access arrangements. Drawing on the theoretical lens of everyday and infrastructural politics and through qualitative case studies in Ghana, this paper investigates how self-supplied water infrastructure shapes socio-material politics within households and how everyday struggles surrounding these “<em>abura</em>”/wells reduce or contribute to maintaining inequalities. Our analysis highlights that while self-supplied water infrastructure is critical for addressing water access gaps, it also acts as a socio-political conduit and site of socio-commodified practices that (re)produce forms of multidimensional inequalities. We demonstrate how everyday struggles around these infrastructures reveal hidden practices and socio-cultural dynamics that create distinct moral economies of resource sharing, where access is governed through cultural performances, negotiated privileges and socio-commodified exchanges rather than market mechanisms. These arrangements create complex systems of water governance that reflect broader African philosophical principles of resource distribution and social bonds, yet paradoxically (re)produce a sense of marginalisation and exploitative relations through systems of social hierarchy and negotiated access. We conclude by raising critical questions about the place-based agenda for Modular, Adaptive and Decentralised infrastructure governance, particularly self-supplied water, highlighting the need to recognise socially embedded institutions while addressing how everyday practices reproduce marginality across Global South cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48376,"journal":{"name":"Habitat International","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103480"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Abura-politics”: The everyday politics and negotiations of households' self-supplied water infrastructure in urban Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Godfred Amankwaa ,&nbsp;Kwame Asamoah Kwarteng ,&nbsp;Edward Ampratwum\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In most Global South cities, off-grid water infrastructures such as self-supplied household dug wells and private boreholes – as alternatives or responses to limited centralised ones – have become important water sources, particularly sustaining underserved urban settlements. However, given their construction within privately held plots, reliance on these water infrastructures reveals complex <em>politics</em> and access arrangements. Drawing on the theoretical lens of everyday and infrastructural politics and through qualitative case studies in Ghana, this paper investigates how self-supplied water infrastructure shapes socio-material politics within households and how everyday struggles surrounding these “<em>abura</em>”/wells reduce or contribute to maintaining inequalities. Our analysis highlights that while self-supplied water infrastructure is critical for addressing water access gaps, it also acts as a socio-political conduit and site of socio-commodified practices that (re)produce forms of multidimensional inequalities. We demonstrate how everyday struggles around these infrastructures reveal hidden practices and socio-cultural dynamics that create distinct moral economies of resource sharing, where access is governed through cultural performances, negotiated privileges and socio-commodified exchanges rather than market mechanisms. These arrangements create complex systems of water governance that reflect broader African philosophical principles of resource distribution and social bonds, yet paradoxically (re)produce a sense of marginalisation and exploitative relations through systems of social hierarchy and negotiated access. We conclude by raising critical questions about the place-based agenda for Modular, Adaptive and Decentralised infrastructure governance, particularly self-supplied water, highlighting the need to recognise socially embedded institutions while addressing how everyday practices reproduce marginality across Global South cities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Habitat International\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Habitat International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525001961\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Habitat International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397525001961","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大多数全球南方城市,离网供水基础设施,如自给自足的家庭挖井和私人钻孔,作为有限的集中供水的替代方案或对策,已成为重要的水源,特别是维持服务不足的城市住区。然而,由于它们是在私人拥有的地块上建造的,对这些水基础设施的依赖揭示了复杂的政治和访问安排。利用日常和基础设施政治的理论视角,并通过加纳的定性案例研究,本文调查了自给供水基础设施如何塑造家庭内部的社会物质政治,以及围绕这些“abura”/井的日常斗争如何减少或促进维持不平等。我们的分析强调,尽管自给供水基础设施对于解决供水差距至关重要,但它也充当了社会政治渠道和社会商品化实践的场所,这些实践(重新)产生了各种形式的多维不平等。我们展示了围绕这些基础设施的日常斗争如何揭示了隐藏的实践和社会文化动态,这些实践和动态创造了独特的资源共享道德经济,其中通过文化表演、谈判特权和社会商品交换而不是市场机制来控制获取。这些安排创造了复杂的水治理系统,反映了更广泛的非洲资源分配和社会关系的哲学原则,但矛盾的是(重新)通过社会等级制度和谈判获取产生了边缘化和剥削关系的感觉。最后,我们提出了关于模块化、适应性和分散式基础设施治理(特别是自给水)的基于地议程的关键问题,强调了在解决日常实践如何在全球南方城市再现边缘化的同时,认识到社会嵌入制度的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Abura-politics”: The everyday politics and negotiations of households' self-supplied water infrastructure in urban Ghana
In most Global South cities, off-grid water infrastructures such as self-supplied household dug wells and private boreholes – as alternatives or responses to limited centralised ones – have become important water sources, particularly sustaining underserved urban settlements. However, given their construction within privately held plots, reliance on these water infrastructures reveals complex politics and access arrangements. Drawing on the theoretical lens of everyday and infrastructural politics and through qualitative case studies in Ghana, this paper investigates how self-supplied water infrastructure shapes socio-material politics within households and how everyday struggles surrounding these “abura”/wells reduce or contribute to maintaining inequalities. Our analysis highlights that while self-supplied water infrastructure is critical for addressing water access gaps, it also acts as a socio-political conduit and site of socio-commodified practices that (re)produce forms of multidimensional inequalities. We demonstrate how everyday struggles around these infrastructures reveal hidden practices and socio-cultural dynamics that create distinct moral economies of resource sharing, where access is governed through cultural performances, negotiated privileges and socio-commodified exchanges rather than market mechanisms. These arrangements create complex systems of water governance that reflect broader African philosophical principles of resource distribution and social bonds, yet paradoxically (re)produce a sense of marginalisation and exploitative relations through systems of social hierarchy and negotiated access. We conclude by raising critical questions about the place-based agenda for Modular, Adaptive and Decentralised infrastructure governance, particularly self-supplied water, highlighting the need to recognise socially embedded institutions while addressing how everyday practices reproduce marginality across Global South cities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
151
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Habitat International is dedicated to the study of urban and rural human settlements: their planning, design, production and management. Its main focus is on urbanisation in its broadest sense in the developing world. However, increasingly the interrelationships and linkages between cities and towns in the developing and developed worlds are becoming apparent and solutions to the problems that result are urgently required. The economic, social, technological and political systems of the world are intertwined and changes in one region almost always affect other regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信