{"title":"社会生态边缘作为一种解决方案:利用不平等来使意大利南部工业规模的风能资本增值和合法化","authors":"Samadhi Lipari","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy.</div><div>I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe.</div><div>At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials.</div><div>As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level.</div><div>In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioecological marginality as a fix: leveraging inequality to valorise and legitimise capital in Southern Italy industrial-scale wind energy\",\"authors\":\"Samadhi Lipari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy.</div><div>I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe.</div><div>At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials.</div><div>As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level.</div><div>In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socioecological marginality as a fix: leveraging inequality to valorise and legitimise capital in Southern Italy industrial-scale wind energy
Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy.
I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe.
At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials.
As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level.
In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.