社会生态边缘作为一种解决方案:利用不平等来使意大利南部工业规模的风能资本增值和合法化

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Samadhi Lipari
{"title":"社会生态边缘作为一种解决方案:利用不平等来使意大利南部工业规模的风能资本增值和合法化","authors":"Samadhi Lipari","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy.</div><div>I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe.</div><div>At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials.</div><div>As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level.</div><div>In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioecological marginality as a fix: leveraging inequality to valorise and legitimise capital in Southern Italy industrial-scale wind energy\",\"authors\":\"Samadhi Lipari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy.</div><div>I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe.</div><div>At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials.</div><div>As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level.</div><div>In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对风能投资来说,社会生态边际是功能性的还是功能性的?如果边际性在功能上嵌入了投资计划,那么它在更广泛的积累动态中扮演什么角色?我将历史唯物主义政治经济学的视角应用于欧洲资本主义边缘的工业规模风能的案例研究:意大利南部的阿普罗-坎帕诺亚平宁山脉。我认为边缘性对风能投资的作用有两个原因。首先,它降低了进入风力涡轮机能够旋转的土地的成本。其次,它为资本积累提供了一个合理的理由,将其定义为解决地方欠发达和全球气候灾难的解决方案。在更高的层次上,社会生态边缘性既是时空的,也是社会生态的。一方面,它确保投资于风能的资本盈余得到充分增值。另一方面,它在“绿色”和社会凭证的幌子下扩展了潜在的社会生态关系的霸权。作为推论,我表明,这两种解决方案都是通过基于地域的阶级、团体和机构之间的联盟来实施的,这些联盟可以获取风能及其周围的剩余价值。这些社会技术合作系统根据领土层面的权力关系重新分配收入和特权。在探索社会生态边际性和资本积累如何相互影响的过程中,本文展示了历史决定的不平等的剥削和结晶如何作为资本主义下风能发电的关键因素发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioecological marginality as a fix: leveraging inequality to valorise and legitimise capital in Southern Italy industrial-scale wind energy
Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy.
I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe.
At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials.
As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level.
In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信