产科患者围手术期使用高流量鼻吸氧:系统回顾。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1111/anae.16665
Robert Craig,Lucy Curran,Sohail Bampoe,Peter Odor,Lindsay Blake,Brendan Carvalho,James O'Carroll
{"title":"产科患者围手术期使用高流量鼻吸氧:系统回顾。","authors":"Robert Craig,Lucy Curran,Sohail Bampoe,Peter Odor,Lindsay Blake,Brendan Carvalho,James O'Carroll","doi":"10.1111/anae.16665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nHigh-flow nasal oxygen devices have gained interest in pre-oxygenation and peri-operative oxygenation strategies. However, their role in obstetric anaesthesia remains poorly defined. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in obstetric patients during the peri-operative period, focusing on maternal oxygenation and clinical outcomes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included studies published in any language, conducted in all countries. Search terms included terminology concerning obstetric anaesthesia related to the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in the peri-operative period. Included papers were assessed for risk of bias. Studies were included for detailed review if they evaluated the use of high-flow nasal oxygen as a pre-oxygenation strategy in obstetric patients and reported maternal or neonatal outcomes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 649 abstracts were screened with 11 articles included. There was variation in pre-oxygenation strategies and primary outcomes. Available evidence suggests that high-flow nasal oxygen was not superior to facemask pre-oxygenation in achieving target end-tidal oxygen concentrations. High-flow nasal oxygen may increase the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, but the evidence of increased apnoea time was inconsistent. There were no reported adverse maternal effects or differences in neonatal Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases or fetal heart rate assessments.\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nThe advantages of peri-operative high-flow nasal oxygen over conventional oxygenation methods for obstetric patients remain uncertain. Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of high-flow nasal oxygen in achieving pre-oxygenation targets or prolonging time to desaturation in low-risk patients, whilst the benefits in high-risk patients remain uncertain and warrant further investigation.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peri-operative use of high-flow nasal oxygen in obstetric patients: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Craig,Lucy Curran,Sohail Bampoe,Peter Odor,Lindsay Blake,Brendan Carvalho,James O'Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nHigh-flow nasal oxygen devices have gained interest in pre-oxygenation and peri-operative oxygenation strategies. However, their role in obstetric anaesthesia remains poorly defined. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in obstetric patients during the peri-operative period, focusing on maternal oxygenation and clinical outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe included studies published in any language, conducted in all countries. Search terms included terminology concerning obstetric anaesthesia related to the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in the peri-operative period. Included papers were assessed for risk of bias. Studies were included for detailed review if they evaluated the use of high-flow nasal oxygen as a pre-oxygenation strategy in obstetric patients and reported maternal or neonatal outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 649 abstracts were screened with 11 articles included. There was variation in pre-oxygenation strategies and primary outcomes. Available evidence suggests that high-flow nasal oxygen was not superior to facemask pre-oxygenation in achieving target end-tidal oxygen concentrations. High-flow nasal oxygen may increase the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, but the evidence of increased apnoea time was inconsistent. There were no reported adverse maternal effects or differences in neonatal Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases or fetal heart rate assessments.\\r\\n\\r\\nDISCUSSION\\r\\nThe advantages of peri-operative high-flow nasal oxygen over conventional oxygenation methods for obstetric patients remain uncertain. Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of high-flow nasal oxygen in achieving pre-oxygenation targets or prolonging time to desaturation in low-risk patients, whilst the benefits in high-risk patients remain uncertain and warrant further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16665\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16665","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高流量鼻吸氧装置在术前氧合和围术期氧合策略中引起了人们的兴趣。然而,它们在产科麻醉中的作用仍然不明确。本系统综述旨在评估围手术期高流量鼻吸氧在产科患者中的应用,重点关注产妇氧合和临床结果。方法我们纳入了在所有国家以任何语言发表的研究。搜索术语包括与围手术期使用高流量鼻氧有关的产科麻醉术语。对纳入的论文进行偏倚风险评估。如果研究评估了高流量鼻氧作为产科患者预充氧策略的使用,并报告了孕产妇或新生儿的结局,则纳入详细的综述。结果共筛选摘要649篇,纳入11篇。预充氧策略和主要结局存在差异。现有证据表明,在达到目标潮末氧浓度方面,高流量鼻氧并不优于面罩预充氧。高流量鼻吸氧可增加动脉血氧分压,但增加呼吸暂停时间的证据不一致。在新生儿阿普加评分、脐带气体或胎儿心率评估方面,没有报告母体不良反应或差异。对于产科患者,围术期高流量鼻氧比传统氧合方法的优势尚不清楚。目前的证据并没有显示高流量鼻氧在低风险患者中达到预充氧目标或延长去饱和时间方面的明显益处,而对高风险患者的益处仍不确定,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peri-operative use of high-flow nasal oxygen in obstetric patients: a systematic review.
INTRODUCTION High-flow nasal oxygen devices have gained interest in pre-oxygenation and peri-operative oxygenation strategies. However, their role in obstetric anaesthesia remains poorly defined. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in obstetric patients during the peri-operative period, focusing on maternal oxygenation and clinical outcomes. METHODS We included studies published in any language, conducted in all countries. Search terms included terminology concerning obstetric anaesthesia related to the use of high-flow nasal oxygen in the peri-operative period. Included papers were assessed for risk of bias. Studies were included for detailed review if they evaluated the use of high-flow nasal oxygen as a pre-oxygenation strategy in obstetric patients and reported maternal or neonatal outcomes. RESULTS A total of 649 abstracts were screened with 11 articles included. There was variation in pre-oxygenation strategies and primary outcomes. Available evidence suggests that high-flow nasal oxygen was not superior to facemask pre-oxygenation in achieving target end-tidal oxygen concentrations. High-flow nasal oxygen may increase the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, but the evidence of increased apnoea time was inconsistent. There were no reported adverse maternal effects or differences in neonatal Apgar scores, umbilical cord gases or fetal heart rate assessments. DISCUSSION The advantages of peri-operative high-flow nasal oxygen over conventional oxygenation methods for obstetric patients remain uncertain. Current evidence does not show a clear benefit of high-flow nasal oxygen in achieving pre-oxygenation targets or prolonging time to desaturation in low-risk patients, whilst the benefits in high-risk patients remain uncertain and warrant further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信