Henrique Madureira da Rocha Coutinho, Joaquim Henrique de Souza Aguiar Coutinho, José Hamilton Torres, Rafaela Mourão Casanova, Gustavo Kikuta, Edison Emídio Reis
{"title":"SafeCEC®单向阀在CPB中溶血的临床评价:初步研究。","authors":"Henrique Madureira da Rocha Coutinho, Joaquim Henrique de Souza Aguiar Coutinho, José Hamilton Torres, Rafaela Mourão Casanova, Gustavo Kikuta, Edison Emídio Reis","doi":"10.1051/ject/2025010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), blood circulation is temporarily maintained by an artificial blood-pumping device during cardiac surgery. Worldwide, approximately half of the CPB procedures utilize either centrifugal or roller pumps (Wu P et al. Front Physiol 12, 699891). Centrifugal pumps, while non-occlusive, pose a risk of blood reflux if there is a system failure, which endangers patient safety (Souza MHL, Elias DO. Fundamentos da Circulação Extracorpórea 2006; 186-192). SafeCEC<sup>®</sup>, a one-way valve, offers a potential solution to this risk by preventing arterial line reflux. This pilot study aims to evaluate patient safety by analyzing hemolysis as an evaluation parameter. Plasma free hemoglobin is chosen to measure patient safety with the use of the product, ensuring it does not cause additional hemolysis during extracorporeal circulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After approval by the Ethics Committee, 31 patients undergoing CPB with a centrifugal pump were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A, where SafeCEC<sup>®</sup> was incorporated into the arterial line, and group B, which used the conventional circuit. Hemolysis was assessed by analyzing plasma free hemoglobin in blood samples collected before CPB, after CPB, and 24 h after weaning from CPB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This device has been shown to be effective in controlling blood reflux, eliminating the need for arterial line clamps. Analysis of plasma free hemoglobin levels revealed no significant differences between the groups with or without SafeCEC<sup>®</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SafeCEC<sup>®</sup> one-way valve effectively prevents reflux without contributing to blood damage, as indicated by the absence of significant hemolysis. This pilot study demonstrates that the SafeCEC<sup>®</sup> is both safe and effective for its intended use.</p>","PeriodicalId":519952,"journal":{"name":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","volume":"57 2","pages":"105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of SafeCEC<sup>®</sup> one-way valve in hemolysis during CPB: Pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Madureira da Rocha Coutinho, Joaquim Henrique de Souza Aguiar Coutinho, José Hamilton Torres, Rafaela Mourão Casanova, Gustavo Kikuta, Edison Emídio Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ject/2025010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), blood circulation is temporarily maintained by an artificial blood-pumping device during cardiac surgery. Worldwide, approximately half of the CPB procedures utilize either centrifugal or roller pumps (Wu P et al. Front Physiol 12, 699891). Centrifugal pumps, while non-occlusive, pose a risk of blood reflux if there is a system failure, which endangers patient safety (Souza MHL, Elias DO. Fundamentos da Circulação Extracorpórea 2006; 186-192). SafeCEC<sup>®</sup>, a one-way valve, offers a potential solution to this risk by preventing arterial line reflux. This pilot study aims to evaluate patient safety by analyzing hemolysis as an evaluation parameter. Plasma free hemoglobin is chosen to measure patient safety with the use of the product, ensuring it does not cause additional hemolysis during extracorporeal circulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After approval by the Ethics Committee, 31 patients undergoing CPB with a centrifugal pump were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A, where SafeCEC<sup>®</sup> was incorporated into the arterial line, and group B, which used the conventional circuit. Hemolysis was assessed by analyzing plasma free hemoglobin in blood samples collected before CPB, after CPB, and 24 h after weaning from CPB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This device has been shown to be effective in controlling blood reflux, eliminating the need for arterial line clamps. Analysis of plasma free hemoglobin levels revealed no significant differences between the groups with or without SafeCEC<sup>®</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SafeCEC<sup>®</sup> one-way valve effectively prevents reflux without contributing to blood damage, as indicated by the absence of significant hemolysis. This pilot study demonstrates that the SafeCEC<sup>®</sup> is both safe and effective for its intended use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of extra-corporeal technology\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"105-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of extra-corporeal technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:在体外循环(CPB)中,在心脏手术期间,人工泵血装置暂时维持血液循环。在世界范围内,大约一半的CPB程序使用离心或滚柱泵(Wu P et al。物理学报,12(2):698 - 698。离心泵虽然不闭塞,但如果发生系统故障,可能会造成血液反流,危及患者安全(Souza MHL, Elias DO)。通告的基本原理a o Extracorpórea 2006;186 - 192)。SafeCEC®是一种单向阀,通过防止动脉回流为这种风险提供了潜在的解决方案。本初步研究旨在通过分析溶血作为评估参数来评估患者的安全性。选择血浆游离血红蛋白来测量患者使用该产品的安全性,确保它在体外循环过程中不会引起额外的溶血。材料和方法:经伦理委员会批准,31例离心泵CPB患者纳入研究。患者被随机分为两组:A组,SafeCEC®纳入动脉线路,B组,使用常规电路。通过分析CPB前、CPB后和CPB断奶后24 h采集的血液样本中的血浆游离血红蛋白来评估溶血情况。结果:该装置已被证明是有效的控制血液回流,不需要动脉线夹。血浆游离血红蛋白水平分析显示,使用或不使用SafeCEC®组之间无显著差异。结论:SafeCEC®单向阀可有效防止反流,而不会造成血液损伤,无明显溶血现象。这项初步研究表明,SafeCEC®对其预期用途既安全又有效。
Clinical evaluation of SafeCEC® one-way valve in hemolysis during CPB: Pilot study.
Introduction: In cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), blood circulation is temporarily maintained by an artificial blood-pumping device during cardiac surgery. Worldwide, approximately half of the CPB procedures utilize either centrifugal or roller pumps (Wu P et al. Front Physiol 12, 699891). Centrifugal pumps, while non-occlusive, pose a risk of blood reflux if there is a system failure, which endangers patient safety (Souza MHL, Elias DO. Fundamentos da Circulação Extracorpórea 2006; 186-192). SafeCEC®, a one-way valve, offers a potential solution to this risk by preventing arterial line reflux. This pilot study aims to evaluate patient safety by analyzing hemolysis as an evaluation parameter. Plasma free hemoglobin is chosen to measure patient safety with the use of the product, ensuring it does not cause additional hemolysis during extracorporeal circulation.
Materials and methods: After approval by the Ethics Committee, 31 patients undergoing CPB with a centrifugal pump were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A, where SafeCEC® was incorporated into the arterial line, and group B, which used the conventional circuit. Hemolysis was assessed by analyzing plasma free hemoglobin in blood samples collected before CPB, after CPB, and 24 h after weaning from CPB.
Results: This device has been shown to be effective in controlling blood reflux, eliminating the need for arterial line clamps. Analysis of plasma free hemoglobin levels revealed no significant differences between the groups with or without SafeCEC®.
Conclusion: The SafeCEC® one-way valve effectively prevents reflux without contributing to blood damage, as indicated by the absence of significant hemolysis. This pilot study demonstrates that the SafeCEC® is both safe and effective for its intended use.