运动中的创造力:单次有氧运动如何影响发散性创造性思维。

IF 1.6
Kabir Sodhi, Samantha Marshall, Gianna Jeyarajan, Jennifer Hanna Al-Shaikh, Raphael Gabiazon, Lindsay S Nagamatsu
{"title":"运动中的创造力:单次有氧运动如何影响发散性创造性思维。","authors":"Kabir Sodhi, Samantha Marshall, Gianna Jeyarajan, Jennifer Hanna Al-Shaikh, Raphael Gabiazon, Lindsay S Nagamatsu","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2025.2513362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Creativity, a key cognitive process for innovation, involves generating novel and valuable ideas. While aerobic exercise is linked to cognitive benefits, its effects on creative thinking remain unclear. Evidence suggests that both single and consecutive exercise sessions may enhance creative thinking, yet the optimal intensity and timing of exercise for benefiting creative thinking have not been fully explored. This study examined whether a 20 minute moderate-to-vigorous cycle session influences divergent creative thinking, and how timing of assessment affects performance. Fifty-one young adults completed Guilford's Alternate Uses Task (AUT) under three conditions: post-exercise, during exercise, or control (after watching an exercise video). AUT performance was measured by fluency (number of ideas), validity (practicality of ideas), flexibility (number of categories), and originality (creativity ratings on a 1-5 scale). No significant differences between the control and post-exercise groups were found. However, those assessed during exercise showed lower originality, fluency, and validity, likely due to dual-task interference. These findings suggest that a 20 minute aerobic session does not enhance creativity and may hinder it when assessed during exercise. The study highlights the need for further research to clarify how exercise intensity, duration, and timing impact creative thinking to optimize potential cognitive benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creativity in Motion: How a Single Aerobic Exercise Session Affects Divergent Creative Thinking.\",\"authors\":\"Kabir Sodhi, Samantha Marshall, Gianna Jeyarajan, Jennifer Hanna Al-Shaikh, Raphael Gabiazon, Lindsay S Nagamatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2025.2513362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Creativity, a key cognitive process for innovation, involves generating novel and valuable ideas. While aerobic exercise is linked to cognitive benefits, its effects on creative thinking remain unclear. Evidence suggests that both single and consecutive exercise sessions may enhance creative thinking, yet the optimal intensity and timing of exercise for benefiting creative thinking have not been fully explored. This study examined whether a 20 minute moderate-to-vigorous cycle session influences divergent creative thinking, and how timing of assessment affects performance. Fifty-one young adults completed Guilford's Alternate Uses Task (AUT) under three conditions: post-exercise, during exercise, or control (after watching an exercise video). AUT performance was measured by fluency (number of ideas), validity (practicality of ideas), flexibility (number of categories), and originality (creativity ratings on a 1-5 scale). No significant differences between the control and post-exercise groups were found. However, those assessed during exercise showed lower originality, fluency, and validity, likely due to dual-task interference. These findings suggest that a 20 minute aerobic session does not enhance creativity and may hinder it when assessed during exercise. The study highlights the need for further research to clarify how exercise intensity, duration, and timing impact creative thinking to optimize potential cognitive benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2513362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2513362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创造力是创新的一个关键认知过程,涉及产生新颖和有价值的想法。虽然有氧运动与认知益处有关,但它对创造性思维的影响尚不清楚。有证据表明,单次和连续的锻炼都可以增强创造性思维,但有益于创造性思维的最佳锻炼强度和时间还没有得到充分的探索。这项研究考察了20分钟的中高强度循环训练是否会影响发散性创造性思维,以及评估时间对表现的影响。51名年轻人在三种条件下完成了吉尔福德的替代用途任务(AUT):运动后、运动中或控制(在观看运动视频后)。AUT的表现是通过流畅性(想法的数量)、有效性(想法的实用性)、灵活性(类别的数量)和独创性(1-5分的创造力评级)来衡量的。对照组和运动后组之间没有发现显著差异。然而,那些在练习中被评估的人表现出较低的独创性、流畅性和有效性,可能是由于双重任务的干扰。这些发现表明,20分钟的有氧运动并不能提高创造力,而且在运动过程中可能会阻碍创造力。该研究强调了进一步研究的必要性,以阐明运动强度、持续时间和时间如何影响创造性思维,从而优化潜在的认知益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creativity in Motion: How a Single Aerobic Exercise Session Affects Divergent Creative Thinking.

Creativity, a key cognitive process for innovation, involves generating novel and valuable ideas. While aerobic exercise is linked to cognitive benefits, its effects on creative thinking remain unclear. Evidence suggests that both single and consecutive exercise sessions may enhance creative thinking, yet the optimal intensity and timing of exercise for benefiting creative thinking have not been fully explored. This study examined whether a 20 minute moderate-to-vigorous cycle session influences divergent creative thinking, and how timing of assessment affects performance. Fifty-one young adults completed Guilford's Alternate Uses Task (AUT) under three conditions: post-exercise, during exercise, or control (after watching an exercise video). AUT performance was measured by fluency (number of ideas), validity (practicality of ideas), flexibility (number of categories), and originality (creativity ratings on a 1-5 scale). No significant differences between the control and post-exercise groups were found. However, those assessed during exercise showed lower originality, fluency, and validity, likely due to dual-task interference. These findings suggest that a 20 minute aerobic session does not enhance creativity and may hinder it when assessed during exercise. The study highlights the need for further research to clarify how exercise intensity, duration, and timing impact creative thinking to optimize potential cognitive benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信