评估当前组织病理学肿瘤报告系统对乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应的疗效:一项观察性研究方案。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anita Sajjanar, Sunita Vagha
{"title":"评估当前组织病理学肿瘤报告系统对乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应的疗效:一项观察性研究方案。","authors":"Anita Sajjanar, Sunita Vagha","doi":"10.2196/56825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With a predicted 2 million new cases identified globally in 2018, breast carcinomas are the most common cancer in women and the primary cause of cancer-associated mortality. In the management of breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT) has become a mainstay, particularly for patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. It increases the possibility of breast-conserving surgery, facilitates tumor downstaging, and gives early indications of the effectiveness of treatment. Evaluating the histopathological response after NACT is crucial for prognosis and guiding subsequent treatment decisions. This study explores the various histopathological assessment systems used in breast carcinoma patients after NACT, focusing on the residual cancer burden (RCB) score, Miller-Payne system, Chevallier classification, Sataloff classification, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18 system, and the American Joint Committee on Cancer residual tumor size (R) categories. We compare their methodologies, strengths, limitations, and clinical significance, providing a detailed analysis of their roles in improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to confirm the diagnosis of breast carcinoma based on histopathology, to evaluate various scoring systems through assessments of histomorphological features affecting post-NACT patients with breast carcinoma, to compare the various systems regarding the response to therapy and forming prognoses, and to develop an ideal histomorphological assessment system for breast carcinoma in post-NACT patients. The study also focused on how breast tumors respond to NACT and how this response can guide treatment decisions and improve the formulation of prognoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study will be retrospective and prospective; it will include 128 patients diagnosed with breast carcinomas who have undergone NACT and were referred to a tertiary care hospital between January 2019 and December 2024. Following chemotherapy, a thorough examination of the histopathological specimens will be conducted to assess any changes in histomorphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data collection started in September 2021 and will be completed by December 2025. Data analysis began in January 2025, and the results are expected to be published in December 2025. Institutional ethics committee clearance was obtained prior to commencement of the study. This is a nonfunded academic study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project aims to evaluate and compare histopathological assessment systems in patients with breast carcinoma after NACT. Various histopathological systems, such as the RCB score, the Miller-Payne grading system, and other systems, each provide valuable insights into how well tumors respond to chemotherapy. The aim is to reveal essential histopathological parameters, leading to the refinement and potential modification of grading systems to improve clinical decision-making, treatment outcomes, and personalized care; however, challenges persist in standardization and consensus.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/56825.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e56825"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Efficacy of Current Histopathological Tumor Reporting Systems for Evaluating the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Carcinoma: Protocol for an Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Sajjanar, Sunita Vagha\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/56825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With a predicted 2 million new cases identified globally in 2018, breast carcinomas are the most common cancer in women and the primary cause of cancer-associated mortality. In the management of breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT) has become a mainstay, particularly for patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. It increases the possibility of breast-conserving surgery, facilitates tumor downstaging, and gives early indications of the effectiveness of treatment. Evaluating the histopathological response after NACT is crucial for prognosis and guiding subsequent treatment decisions. This study explores the various histopathological assessment systems used in breast carcinoma patients after NACT, focusing on the residual cancer burden (RCB) score, Miller-Payne system, Chevallier classification, Sataloff classification, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18 system, and the American Joint Committee on Cancer residual tumor size (R) categories. We compare their methodologies, strengths, limitations, and clinical significance, providing a detailed analysis of their roles in improving patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to confirm the diagnosis of breast carcinoma based on histopathology, to evaluate various scoring systems through assessments of histomorphological features affecting post-NACT patients with breast carcinoma, to compare the various systems regarding the response to therapy and forming prognoses, and to develop an ideal histomorphological assessment system for breast carcinoma in post-NACT patients. The study also focused on how breast tumors respond to NACT and how this response can guide treatment decisions and improve the formulation of prognoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study will be retrospective and prospective; it will include 128 patients diagnosed with breast carcinomas who have undergone NACT and were referred to a tertiary care hospital between January 2019 and December 2024. Following chemotherapy, a thorough examination of the histopathological specimens will be conducted to assess any changes in histomorphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data collection started in September 2021 and will be completed by December 2025. Data analysis began in January 2025, and the results are expected to be published in December 2025. Institutional ethics committee clearance was obtained prior to commencement of the study. This is a nonfunded academic study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This project aims to evaluate and compare histopathological assessment systems in patients with breast carcinoma after NACT. Various histopathological systems, such as the RCB score, the Miller-Payne grading system, and other systems, each provide valuable insights into how well tumors respond to chemotherapy. The aim is to reveal essential histopathological parameters, leading to the refinement and potential modification of grading systems to improve clinical decision-making, treatment outcomes, and personalized care; however, challenges persist in standardization and consensus.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/56825.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"e56825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12209717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Research Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/56825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预计2018年全球将新增200万例乳腺癌病例,乳腺癌是女性中最常见的癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。在乳腺癌的治疗中,新辅助化疗(NACT)已成为主流,特别是对于炎症性和局部晚期乳腺癌患者。它增加了保乳手术的可能性,促进了肿瘤分期的降低,并提供了治疗效果的早期迹象。评估NACT后的组织病理反应对预后和指导后续治疗决策至关重要。本研究探讨了NACT后乳腺癌患者使用的各种组织病理学评估体系,重点关注残留癌负担(RCB)评分、Miller-Payne评分、Chevallier分级、Sataloff分级、国家手术辅助乳腺和肠项目(NSABP)方案B-18体系以及美国癌症残留肿瘤大小(R)分类。我们比较了它们的方法、优势、局限性和临床意义,并详细分析了它们在改善患者预后方面的作用。目的:本研究的目的是基于组织病理学来确定乳腺癌的诊断,通过评估影响nact后乳腺癌患者的组织形态学特征来评价各种评分体系,比较各种评分体系对治疗的反应和形成预后的影响,建立一套理想的nact后乳腺癌组织形态学评估体系。该研究还关注了乳腺肿瘤对NACT的反应,以及这种反应如何指导治疗决策和改善预后的制定。方法:本观察性研究为回顾性和前瞻性研究;它将包括128名被诊断患有乳腺癌的患者,这些患者在2019年1月至2024年12月期间接受了NACT治疗,并被转介到三级护理医院。化疗后,将对组织病理学标本进行彻底检查,以评估组织形态学的任何变化。结果:数据收集于2021年9月开始,将于2025年12月完成。数据分析于2025年1月开始,预计结果将于2025年12月公布。在研究开始前获得了机构伦理委员会的许可。这是一项非资助的学术研究。结论:本项目旨在评价和比较NACT后乳腺癌患者的组织病理学评估系统。各种组织病理学系统,如RCB评分、Miller-Payne分级系统和其他系统,都为肿瘤对化疗的反应提供了有价值的见解。目的是揭示基本的组织病理学参数,导致分级系统的改进和潜在的修改,以改善临床决策,治疗结果和个性化护理;然而,在标准化和共识方面仍然存在挑战。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/56825。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Efficacy of Current Histopathological Tumor Reporting Systems for Evaluating the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Carcinoma: Protocol for an Observational Study.

Background: With a predicted 2 million new cases identified globally in 2018, breast carcinomas are the most common cancer in women and the primary cause of cancer-associated mortality. In the management of breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT) has become a mainstay, particularly for patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. It increases the possibility of breast-conserving surgery, facilitates tumor downstaging, and gives early indications of the effectiveness of treatment. Evaluating the histopathological response after NACT is crucial for prognosis and guiding subsequent treatment decisions. This study explores the various histopathological assessment systems used in breast carcinoma patients after NACT, focusing on the residual cancer burden (RCB) score, Miller-Payne system, Chevallier classification, Sataloff classification, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18 system, and the American Joint Committee on Cancer residual tumor size (R) categories. We compare their methodologies, strengths, limitations, and clinical significance, providing a detailed analysis of their roles in improving patient outcomes.

Objective: The aim of this study is to confirm the diagnosis of breast carcinoma based on histopathology, to evaluate various scoring systems through assessments of histomorphological features affecting post-NACT patients with breast carcinoma, to compare the various systems regarding the response to therapy and forming prognoses, and to develop an ideal histomorphological assessment system for breast carcinoma in post-NACT patients. The study also focused on how breast tumors respond to NACT and how this response can guide treatment decisions and improve the formulation of prognoses.

Methods: This observational study will be retrospective and prospective; it will include 128 patients diagnosed with breast carcinomas who have undergone NACT and were referred to a tertiary care hospital between January 2019 and December 2024. Following chemotherapy, a thorough examination of the histopathological specimens will be conducted to assess any changes in histomorphology.

Results: Data collection started in September 2021 and will be completed by December 2025. Data analysis began in January 2025, and the results are expected to be published in December 2025. Institutional ethics committee clearance was obtained prior to commencement of the study. This is a nonfunded academic study.

Conclusions: This project aims to evaluate and compare histopathological assessment systems in patients with breast carcinoma after NACT. Various histopathological systems, such as the RCB score, the Miller-Payne grading system, and other systems, each provide valuable insights into how well tumors respond to chemotherapy. The aim is to reveal essential histopathological parameters, leading to the refinement and potential modification of grading systems to improve clinical decision-making, treatment outcomes, and personalized care; however, challenges persist in standardization and consensus.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/56825.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信