Mohammed Saed Shorbagy, Ramy Mahrose, Amr A Kasem, Yasmin Abdelrazik Ali, Sally Hamdy Abdelaziz
{"title":"鼻内右美托咪定与鼻内咪达唑仑作为经导管膜周室间隔缺损(VSD)闭合的儿科患者的标准护理:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Mohammed Saed Shorbagy, Ramy Mahrose, Amr A Kasem, Yasmin Abdelrazik Ali, Sally Hamdy Abdelaziz","doi":"10.5114/ait/200231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sedative premedication may hold notable significance in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, as it minimizes anxiety, facilitates parental separation, and allows for the acceptance of inhalational induction. The intranasal route is a reliable method for administering sedatives as pre- medication in pediatric patients. This study compared and evaluated the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 40 pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years scheduled for transcatheter perimembranous VSD closure under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal midazolam at 0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> body mass or intranasal dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> body mass. The primary outcome measured was the effect of preoperative sedatives on the Ramsay sedation score. Secondary outcomes included the child-parent separation score, child emergence agitation level, effects on hemodynamics, and oxygen saturation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 40 individuals with similar demographic profiles and comparable duration of the procedure (<i>P</i> = 0.152) in both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in the Ramsay sedation score (<i>P</i> = 0.582), child-parent separation score (<i>P</i> = 1.000) 20 minutes after drug administration, or postoperative child emergence agitation level (<i>P</i> = 0.351). No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric patients were successfully and effectively sedated with both intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam, with stable hemodynamics and oxygen saturation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as a standard of care for pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Saed Shorbagy, Ramy Mahrose, Amr A Kasem, Yasmin Abdelrazik Ali, Sally Hamdy Abdelaziz\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/ait/200231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sedative premedication may hold notable significance in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, as it minimizes anxiety, facilitates parental separation, and allows for the acceptance of inhalational induction. The intranasal route is a reliable method for administering sedatives as pre- medication in pediatric patients. This study compared and evaluated the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 40 pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years scheduled for transcatheter perimembranous VSD closure under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal midazolam at 0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> body mass or intranasal dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> body mass. The primary outcome measured was the effect of preoperative sedatives on the Ramsay sedation score. Secondary outcomes included the child-parent separation score, child emergence agitation level, effects on hemodynamics, and oxygen saturation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 40 individuals with similar demographic profiles and comparable duration of the procedure (<i>P</i> = 0.152) in both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in the Ramsay sedation score (<i>P</i> = 0.582), child-parent separation score (<i>P</i> = 1.000) 20 minutes after drug administration, or postoperative child emergence agitation level (<i>P</i> = 0.351). No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric patients were successfully and effectively sedated with both intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam, with stable hemodynamics and oxygen saturation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"115-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/200231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/200231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as a standard of care for pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure: a randomized controlled trial.
Introduction: Sedative premedication may hold notable significance in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, as it minimizes anxiety, facilitates parental separation, and allows for the acceptance of inhalational induction. The intranasal route is a reliable method for administering sedatives as pre- medication in pediatric patients. This study compared and evaluated the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects.
Material and methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 40 pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years scheduled for transcatheter perimembranous VSD closure under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal midazolam at 0.2 mg kg-1 body mass or intranasal dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg kg-1 body mass. The primary outcome measured was the effect of preoperative sedatives on the Ramsay sedation score. Secondary outcomes included the child-parent separation score, child emergence agitation level, effects on hemodynamics, and oxygen saturation.
Results: This study included 40 individuals with similar demographic profiles and comparable duration of the procedure (P = 0.152) in both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in the Ramsay sedation score (P = 0.582), child-parent separation score (P = 1.000) 20 minutes after drug administration, or postoperative child emergence agitation level (P = 0.351). No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation between the two groups.
Conclusions: Pediatric patients were successfully and effectively sedated with both intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam, with stable hemodynamics and oxygen saturation.