比较常规静脉血采样和以患者为中心的微采样的健康成人扎维格坦鼻喷雾剂的药代动力学研究

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mohamed H. Shahin, Ogert Fisniku, Ding Ding, Katty Wan, Sergey Dubrovin, Kyle Matschke, Olga Kavetska, Robert Fountaine, Jing Liu
{"title":"比较常规静脉血采样和以患者为中心的微采样的健康成人扎维格坦鼻喷雾剂的药代动力学研究","authors":"Mohamed H. Shahin,&nbsp;Ogert Fisniku,&nbsp;Ding Ding,&nbsp;Katty Wan,&nbsp;Sergey Dubrovin,&nbsp;Kyle Matschke,&nbsp;Olga Kavetska,&nbsp;Robert Fountaine,&nbsp;Jing Liu","doi":"10.1111/cts.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Phase 1, non-randomized, open-label, 2-period study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of zavegepant nasal spray, using samples collected via patient-centric microsampling (PCS) devices, with those collected through venous phlebotomy (NCT05948085). Fourteen healthy participants received a single intranasal dose of 10 mg zavegepant on Days 1 and 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post dose on Day 1 using the Tasso-Plus device (<i>n</i> = 7; produces serum samples), Tasso-M20 (<i>n</i> = 7; produces dried blood samples), and venous phlebotomy (<i>n</i> = 14). PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Natural log-transformed areas under the plasma/serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum serum/plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) of zavegepant were analyzed using a mixed-effects model, with blood collection as a fixed effect and participant as a random effect. Of the two PCS devices assessed, the results of the Tasso-Plus device showed successful bridging with venous phlebotomy sampling. For Tasso-Plus versus venous phlebotomy, 39 of 41 (95.1%) data pairs met concentration correlation criteria (difference within 20% of the mean), median zavegepant concentration-time profiles were comparable, and 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios for AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were wholly within the range of bioequivalence acceptance (80%–125%). The results of this study confirm that it is feasible to use serum derived from Tasso-Plus collection of whole capillary blood as a reliable PCS approach for PK analysis of zavegepant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70199","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pharmacokinetic Study of Zavegepant Nasal Spray in Healthy Adults Comparing Conventional Venous Blood Sampling With Patient-Centric Microsampling\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed H. Shahin,&nbsp;Ogert Fisniku,&nbsp;Ding Ding,&nbsp;Katty Wan,&nbsp;Sergey Dubrovin,&nbsp;Kyle Matschke,&nbsp;Olga Kavetska,&nbsp;Robert Fountaine,&nbsp;Jing Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This Phase 1, non-randomized, open-label, 2-period study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of zavegepant nasal spray, using samples collected via patient-centric microsampling (PCS) devices, with those collected through venous phlebotomy (NCT05948085). Fourteen healthy participants received a single intranasal dose of 10 mg zavegepant on Days 1 and 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post dose on Day 1 using the Tasso-Plus device (<i>n</i> = 7; produces serum samples), Tasso-M20 (<i>n</i> = 7; produces dried blood samples), and venous phlebotomy (<i>n</i> = 14). PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Natural log-transformed areas under the plasma/serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum serum/plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) of zavegepant were analyzed using a mixed-effects model, with blood collection as a fixed effect and participant as a random effect. Of the two PCS devices assessed, the results of the Tasso-Plus device showed successful bridging with venous phlebotomy sampling. For Tasso-Plus versus venous phlebotomy, 39 of 41 (95.1%) data pairs met concentration correlation criteria (difference within 20% of the mean), median zavegepant concentration-time profiles were comparable, and 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios for AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were wholly within the range of bioequivalence acceptance (80%–125%). The results of this study confirm that it is feasible to use serum derived from Tasso-Plus collection of whole capillary blood as a reliable PCS approach for PK analysis of zavegepant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70199\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70199\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项1期、非随机、开放标签、2期的研究比较了zavegepant鼻喷雾剂的药代动力学(PK),使用的是通过以患者为中心的微采样(PCS)设备收集的样本,与通过静脉采血(NCT05948085)收集的样本。14名健康参与者在第1天和第2天接受单次鼻内剂量10mg zavegepent。使用Tasso-Plus装置于第1天给药后0.5、1、2、4、8和12 h采集血样进行PK分析(n = 7;产生血清样本),Tasso-M20 (n = 7;产生干血样)和静脉静脉切开术(n = 14)。采用非区室法计算PK参数。采用混合效应模型,以采血作为固定效应,参与者作为随机效应,分析zaveggepant从时间零点到最后可量化浓度(AUClast)和最大血清/血浆浓度(Cmax)的血浆/血清浓度-时间曲线下的自然对数变换区域。在评估的两种PCS装置中,Tasso-Plus装置的结果显示成功地与静脉抽血取样桥接。对于Tasso-Plus与静脉放血,41对数据中有39对(95.1%)符合浓度相关标准(差异在平均值的20%以内),中位药物浓度-时间曲线具有可比性,AUClast和Cmax的几何平均比率的90%置信区间完全在生物等效性可接受范围内(80%-125%)。本研究结果证实,利用Tasso-Plus全毛细管血提取的血清作为可靠的PCS方法进行zaveggepant的PK分析是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Pharmacokinetic Study of Zavegepant Nasal Spray in Healthy Adults Comparing Conventional Venous Blood Sampling With Patient-Centric Microsampling

A Pharmacokinetic Study of Zavegepant Nasal Spray in Healthy Adults Comparing Conventional Venous Blood Sampling With Patient-Centric Microsampling

This Phase 1, non-randomized, open-label, 2-period study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of zavegepant nasal spray, using samples collected via patient-centric microsampling (PCS) devices, with those collected through venous phlebotomy (NCT05948085). Fourteen healthy participants received a single intranasal dose of 10 mg zavegepant on Days 1 and 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post dose on Day 1 using the Tasso-Plus device (n = 7; produces serum samples), Tasso-M20 (n = 7; produces dried blood samples), and venous phlebotomy (n = 14). PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Natural log-transformed areas under the plasma/serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) and maximum serum/plasma concentration (Cmax) of zavegepant were analyzed using a mixed-effects model, with blood collection as a fixed effect and participant as a random effect. Of the two PCS devices assessed, the results of the Tasso-Plus device showed successful bridging with venous phlebotomy sampling. For Tasso-Plus versus venous phlebotomy, 39 of 41 (95.1%) data pairs met concentration correlation criteria (difference within 20% of the mean), median zavegepant concentration-time profiles were comparable, and 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios for AUClast and Cmax were wholly within the range of bioequivalence acceptance (80%–125%). The results of this study confirm that it is feasible to use serum derived from Tasso-Plus collection of whole capillary blood as a reliable PCS approach for PK analysis of zavegepant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信