Mohamed H. Shahin, Ogert Fisniku, Ding Ding, Katty Wan, Sergey Dubrovin, Kyle Matschke, Olga Kavetska, Robert Fountaine, Jing Liu
{"title":"比较常规静脉血采样和以患者为中心的微采样的健康成人扎维格坦鼻喷雾剂的药代动力学研究","authors":"Mohamed H. Shahin, Ogert Fisniku, Ding Ding, Katty Wan, Sergey Dubrovin, Kyle Matschke, Olga Kavetska, Robert Fountaine, Jing Liu","doi":"10.1111/cts.70199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Phase 1, non-randomized, open-label, 2-period study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of zavegepant nasal spray, using samples collected via patient-centric microsampling (PCS) devices, with those collected through venous phlebotomy (NCT05948085). Fourteen healthy participants received a single intranasal dose of 10 mg zavegepant on Days 1 and 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post dose on Day 1 using the Tasso-Plus device (<i>n</i> = 7; produces serum samples), Tasso-M20 (<i>n</i> = 7; produces dried blood samples), and venous phlebotomy (<i>n</i> = 14). PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Natural log-transformed areas under the plasma/serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum serum/plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) of zavegepant were analyzed using a mixed-effects model, with blood collection as a fixed effect and participant as a random effect. Of the two PCS devices assessed, the results of the Tasso-Plus device showed successful bridging with venous phlebotomy sampling. For Tasso-Plus versus venous phlebotomy, 39 of 41 (95.1%) data pairs met concentration correlation criteria (difference within 20% of the mean), median zavegepant concentration-time profiles were comparable, and 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios for AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were wholly within the range of bioequivalence acceptance (80%–125%). The results of this study confirm that it is feasible to use serum derived from Tasso-Plus collection of whole capillary blood as a reliable PCS approach for PK analysis of zavegepant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70199","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pharmacokinetic Study of Zavegepant Nasal Spray in Healthy Adults Comparing Conventional Venous Blood Sampling With Patient-Centric Microsampling\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed H. Shahin, Ogert Fisniku, Ding Ding, Katty Wan, Sergey Dubrovin, Kyle Matschke, Olga Kavetska, Robert Fountaine, Jing Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This Phase 1, non-randomized, open-label, 2-period study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of zavegepant nasal spray, using samples collected via patient-centric microsampling (PCS) devices, with those collected through venous phlebotomy (NCT05948085). Fourteen healthy participants received a single intranasal dose of 10 mg zavegepant on Days 1 and 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post dose on Day 1 using the Tasso-Plus device (<i>n</i> = 7; produces serum samples), Tasso-M20 (<i>n</i> = 7; produces dried blood samples), and venous phlebotomy (<i>n</i> = 14). PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Natural log-transformed areas under the plasma/serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>) and maximum serum/plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) of zavegepant were analyzed using a mixed-effects model, with blood collection as a fixed effect and participant as a random effect. Of the two PCS devices assessed, the results of the Tasso-Plus device showed successful bridging with venous phlebotomy sampling. For Tasso-Plus versus venous phlebotomy, 39 of 41 (95.1%) data pairs met concentration correlation criteria (difference within 20% of the mean), median zavegepant concentration-time profiles were comparable, and 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios for AUC<sub>last</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were wholly within the range of bioequivalence acceptance (80%–125%). The results of this study confirm that it is feasible to use serum derived from Tasso-Plus collection of whole capillary blood as a reliable PCS approach for PK analysis of zavegepant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70199\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70199\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Pharmacokinetic Study of Zavegepant Nasal Spray in Healthy Adults Comparing Conventional Venous Blood Sampling With Patient-Centric Microsampling
This Phase 1, non-randomized, open-label, 2-period study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of zavegepant nasal spray, using samples collected via patient-centric microsampling (PCS) devices, with those collected through venous phlebotomy (NCT05948085). Fourteen healthy participants received a single intranasal dose of 10 mg zavegepant on Days 1 and 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h post dose on Day 1 using the Tasso-Plus device (n = 7; produces serum samples), Tasso-M20 (n = 7; produces dried blood samples), and venous phlebotomy (n = 14). PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Natural log-transformed areas under the plasma/serum concentration-time profile from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) and maximum serum/plasma concentration (Cmax) of zavegepant were analyzed using a mixed-effects model, with blood collection as a fixed effect and participant as a random effect. Of the two PCS devices assessed, the results of the Tasso-Plus device showed successful bridging with venous phlebotomy sampling. For Tasso-Plus versus venous phlebotomy, 39 of 41 (95.1%) data pairs met concentration correlation criteria (difference within 20% of the mean), median zavegepant concentration-time profiles were comparable, and 90% confidence intervals for geometric mean ratios for AUClast and Cmax were wholly within the range of bioequivalence acceptance (80%–125%). The results of this study confirm that it is feasible to use serum derived from Tasso-Plus collection of whole capillary blood as a reliable PCS approach for PK analysis of zavegepant.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.