计算效率高的基于身份的代理签名评估

Saddam Hussain;Ali Tufail;Haji Awg Abdul Ghani Naim;Muhammad Asghar Khan;Gordana Barb
{"title":"计算效率高的基于身份的代理签名评估","authors":"Saddam Hussain;Ali Tufail;Haji Awg Abdul Ghani Naim;Muhammad Asghar Khan;Gordana Barb","doi":"10.1109/OJCS.2025.3573638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proxy signatures (PS) are important cryptographic primitives widely used in digital signature applications across various domains. This survey explores PS security solutions in Identity-Based settings, including Short Identity-Based Proxy Signature (SIBPS), Identity-Based Proxy Signature with Message Recovery (IBPSMR), and Identity-Based Designated Verifier Signature (IBDVS). It also determines the performance of IBPS to address security requirements for delegation within resource-limited environments such as IoT devices and cloud computing. The evaluation determines performance bottlenecks while optimizing the computational complexity and communication overhead to support the practical and real-world implementation of IBPS. The findings reveal that IBPS schemes suffer from significant computation time and communication overhead due to heavy bilinear pairing operations. To evaluate and compare these schemes, we employ the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) model, which ranks the IBPS schemes according to their relative performance. The results indicate that the scheme proposed by Sarde et al., 2015 achieves the best performance, with a computation time of 6.9118 milliseconds and a communication overhead of 2464 bits. It is followed by the scheme from Jenefa and Shen et al., 2024 which records 7.7743 milliseconds and 2848 bits, and the scheme from Gu et al., 2015 with 6.2194 milliseconds and 3104 bits, respectively. Finally, we explored potential directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":13205,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"846-861"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11015719","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Computationally Efficient Identity-Based Proxy Signatures\",\"authors\":\"Saddam Hussain;Ali Tufail;Haji Awg Abdul Ghani Naim;Muhammad Asghar Khan;Gordana Barb\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJCS.2025.3573638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proxy signatures (PS) are important cryptographic primitives widely used in digital signature applications across various domains. This survey explores PS security solutions in Identity-Based settings, including Short Identity-Based Proxy Signature (SIBPS), Identity-Based Proxy Signature with Message Recovery (IBPSMR), and Identity-Based Designated Verifier Signature (IBDVS). It also determines the performance of IBPS to address security requirements for delegation within resource-limited environments such as IoT devices and cloud computing. The evaluation determines performance bottlenecks while optimizing the computational complexity and communication overhead to support the practical and real-world implementation of IBPS. The findings reveal that IBPS schemes suffer from significant computation time and communication overhead due to heavy bilinear pairing operations. To evaluate and compare these schemes, we employ the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) model, which ranks the IBPS schemes according to their relative performance. The results indicate that the scheme proposed by Sarde et al., 2015 achieves the best performance, with a computation time of 6.9118 milliseconds and a communication overhead of 2464 bits. It is followed by the scheme from Jenefa and Shen et al., 2024 which records 7.7743 milliseconds and 2848 bits, and the scheme from Gu et al., 2015 with 6.2194 milliseconds and 3104 bits, respectively. Finally, we explored potential directions for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"846-861\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11015719\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11015719/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11015719/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代理签名是一种重要的加密原语,广泛应用于各个领域的数字签名应用中。本调查探讨了基于身份设置中的PS安全解决方案,包括基于短身份的代理签名(SIBPS)、基于身份的消息恢复代理签名(IBPSMR)和基于身份的指定验证者签名(IBDVS)。它还决定了IBPS的性能,以解决资源有限环境(如物联网设备和云计算)中委托的安全需求。评估确定了性能瓶颈,同时优化了计算复杂性和通信开销,以支持IBPS的实际和真实实现。研究结果表明,由于大量的双线性配对操作,IBPS方案的计算时间和通信开销很大。为了对这些方案进行评价和比较,我们采用了基于平均解决方案距离的评价(EDAS)模型,根据它们的相对性能对IBPS方案进行排名。结果表明,Sarde et al., 2015提出的方案性能最好,计算时间为6.9118毫秒,通信开销为2464位。其次是Jenefa和Shen等人(2024)的方案,记录了7.7743毫秒和2848位,Gu等人(2015)的方案分别记录了6.2194毫秒和3104位。最后,探讨了未来研究的可能方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Computationally Efficient Identity-Based Proxy Signatures
Proxy signatures (PS) are important cryptographic primitives widely used in digital signature applications across various domains. This survey explores PS security solutions in Identity-Based settings, including Short Identity-Based Proxy Signature (SIBPS), Identity-Based Proxy Signature with Message Recovery (IBPSMR), and Identity-Based Designated Verifier Signature (IBDVS). It also determines the performance of IBPS to address security requirements for delegation within resource-limited environments such as IoT devices and cloud computing. The evaluation determines performance bottlenecks while optimizing the computational complexity and communication overhead to support the practical and real-world implementation of IBPS. The findings reveal that IBPS schemes suffer from significant computation time and communication overhead due to heavy bilinear pairing operations. To evaluate and compare these schemes, we employ the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) model, which ranks the IBPS schemes according to their relative performance. The results indicate that the scheme proposed by Sarde et al., 2015 achieves the best performance, with a computation time of 6.9118 milliseconds and a communication overhead of 2464 bits. It is followed by the scheme from Jenefa and Shen et al., 2024 which records 7.7743 milliseconds and 2848 bits, and the scheme from Gu et al., 2015 with 6.2194 milliseconds and 3104 bits, respectively. Finally, we explored potential directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信