评估早期以股权为中心的组织的评估能力

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Rebecca H. Woodland , Vafa Alakbarova , Charlotte F. Elwell
{"title":"评估早期以股权为中心的组织的评估能力","authors":"Rebecca H. Woodland ,&nbsp;Vafa Alakbarova ,&nbsp;Charlotte F. Elwell","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over an eight-month period, we systematically assessed the evaluation capacity of SJC, a developing agency committed to advancing culturally responsive education through resource provision and professional development. This capacity assessment was undertaken to inform the future design and implementation of a comprehensive program evaluation plan tailored to SJC’s evolving operational and programmatic needs. To carry out this capacity assessment, our team employed a mixed-methods approach that included social network analysis, qualitative interviews, a stakeholder survey, and a review of existing organizational datasets. In this paper, we describe our evaluation methods, findings, and the actions that we recommended that SJC leaders take to strengthen their organization’s capacity for learning, program evaluation, and data-informed decision-making. We reflect on key lessons learned about assessing organizational capacity for learning and evaluation in small, emergent, mission-driven agencies. One important insight was the critical importance of embracing cultural humility when navigating evaluator-stakeholder power dynamics and paradigmatic dissonance—particularly when external evaluators are invited to “diagnose” organizational capacity and prescribe improvement strategies. Prioritizing the values, experiences, and cultural context of SJC, rather than imposing a top-down, expert-driven approach, was essential to ensuring the credibility, utility, and relevance of our findings. Additionally, from a technical perspective, the use of social network analysis proved highly valuable in illuminating SJC’s internal communication patterns and how such structures may enable or constrain organizational learning, evaluation, and project management—core functions essential to advancing SJC’s mission and organizational effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 102618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing evaluation capacity in an early stage equity-focused organization\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca H. Woodland ,&nbsp;Vafa Alakbarova ,&nbsp;Charlotte F. Elwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Over an eight-month period, we systematically assessed the evaluation capacity of SJC, a developing agency committed to advancing culturally responsive education through resource provision and professional development. This capacity assessment was undertaken to inform the future design and implementation of a comprehensive program evaluation plan tailored to SJC’s evolving operational and programmatic needs. To carry out this capacity assessment, our team employed a mixed-methods approach that included social network analysis, qualitative interviews, a stakeholder survey, and a review of existing organizational datasets. In this paper, we describe our evaluation methods, findings, and the actions that we recommended that SJC leaders take to strengthen their organization’s capacity for learning, program evaluation, and data-informed decision-making. We reflect on key lessons learned about assessing organizational capacity for learning and evaluation in small, emergent, mission-driven agencies. One important insight was the critical importance of embracing cultural humility when navigating evaluator-stakeholder power dynamics and paradigmatic dissonance—particularly when external evaluators are invited to “diagnose” organizational capacity and prescribe improvement strategies. Prioritizing the values, experiences, and cultural context of SJC, rather than imposing a top-down, expert-driven approach, was essential to ensuring the credibility, utility, and relevance of our findings. Additionally, from a technical perspective, the use of social network analysis proved highly valuable in illuminating SJC’s internal communication patterns and how such structures may enable or constrain organizational learning, evaluation, and project management—core functions essential to advancing SJC’s mission and organizational effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在八个月的时间里,我们系统地评估了SJC的评估能力,SJC是一家致力于通过资源提供和专业发展来推进文化响应教育的发展机构。进行这种能力评估是为了为SJC不断发展的业务和规划需求量身定制的综合项目评估计划的未来设计和实施提供信息。为了进行这种能力评估,我们的团队采用了一种混合方法,包括社会网络分析、定性访谈、利益相关者调查和对现有组织数据集的回顾。在本文中,我们描述了我们的评估方法、发现,以及我们建议SJC领导人采取的行动,以加强他们组织的学习、项目评估和数据知情决策的能力。我们反思了在小型、紧急、任务驱动的机构中评估组织学习和评估能力的主要经验教训。一个重要的见解是,当评估者-利益相关者的权力动态和范式不协调时,特别是当外部评估者被邀请来“诊断”组织能力并规定改进策略时,拥抱文化谦逊的重要性至关重要。优先考虑SJC的价值观、经验和文化背景,而不是强加一种自上而下的、专家驱动的方法,这对于确保我们的发现的可信度、实用性和相关性至关重要。此外,从技术角度来看,社会网络分析的使用在阐明SJC的内部沟通模式以及这种结构如何能够启用或限制组织学习、评估和项目管理方面证明了很高的价值,这些核心功能对于推进SJC的使命和组织效率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing evaluation capacity in an early stage equity-focused organization
Over an eight-month period, we systematically assessed the evaluation capacity of SJC, a developing agency committed to advancing culturally responsive education through resource provision and professional development. This capacity assessment was undertaken to inform the future design and implementation of a comprehensive program evaluation plan tailored to SJC’s evolving operational and programmatic needs. To carry out this capacity assessment, our team employed a mixed-methods approach that included social network analysis, qualitative interviews, a stakeholder survey, and a review of existing organizational datasets. In this paper, we describe our evaluation methods, findings, and the actions that we recommended that SJC leaders take to strengthen their organization’s capacity for learning, program evaluation, and data-informed decision-making. We reflect on key lessons learned about assessing organizational capacity for learning and evaluation in small, emergent, mission-driven agencies. One important insight was the critical importance of embracing cultural humility when navigating evaluator-stakeholder power dynamics and paradigmatic dissonance—particularly when external evaluators are invited to “diagnose” organizational capacity and prescribe improvement strategies. Prioritizing the values, experiences, and cultural context of SJC, rather than imposing a top-down, expert-driven approach, was essential to ensuring the credibility, utility, and relevance of our findings. Additionally, from a technical perspective, the use of social network analysis proved highly valuable in illuminating SJC’s internal communication patterns and how such structures may enable or constrain organizational learning, evaluation, and project management—core functions essential to advancing SJC’s mission and organizational effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信