法院重新点燃CRISPR专利之争

IF 33.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
{"title":"法院重新点燃CRISPR专利之争","authors":"","doi":"10.1038/s41587-025-02717-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The University of California and the University of Vienna have convinced a US appeals court to revive their bid for patent rights to the CRISPR–Cas9 gene-editing technology created by their scientists Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier. The case was sent back to the Patent Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board for reconsideration after the court found fault with a previous patent tribunal’s ruling giving key CRISPR–Cas9 patent rights to the Broad Institute and researcher Feng Zhang. This will give Nobel prize winners Doudna and Charpentier and their respective universities another chance to claim rights to CRISPR–Cas9 patents as true inventors in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":19084,"journal":{"name":"Nature biotechnology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court reignites CRISPR patent dispute\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41587-025-02717-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The University of California and the University of Vienna have convinced a US appeals court to revive their bid for patent rights to the CRISPR–Cas9 gene-editing technology created by their scientists Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier. The case was sent back to the Patent Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board for reconsideration after the court found fault with a previous patent tribunal’s ruling giving key CRISPR–Cas9 patent rights to the Broad Institute and researcher Feng Zhang. This will give Nobel prize winners Doudna and Charpentier and their respective universities another chance to claim rights to CRISPR–Cas9 patents as true inventors in the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":33.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02717-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02717-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加州大学和维也纳大学已经说服美国上诉法院重新申请由他们的科学家Jennifer Doudna和Emmanuelle Charpentier创造的CRISPR-Cas9基因编辑技术的专利权。该案件被送回专利局的专利审判和上诉委员会重新审议,此前法院认定专利法庭将CRISPR-Cas9的关键专利权授予博德研究所和张锋研究员的裁决存在错误。这将给诺贝尔奖得主杜德纳和查彭蒂耶以及他们各自的大学提供另一个机会,让他们在美国以真正的发明者的身份申请CRISPR-Cas9专利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Court reignites CRISPR patent dispute

The University of California and the University of Vienna have convinced a US appeals court to revive their bid for patent rights to the CRISPR–Cas9 gene-editing technology created by their scientists Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier. The case was sent back to the Patent Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board for reconsideration after the court found fault with a previous patent tribunal’s ruling giving key CRISPR–Cas9 patent rights to the Broad Institute and researcher Feng Zhang. This will give Nobel prize winners Doudna and Charpentier and their respective universities another chance to claim rights to CRISPR–Cas9 patents as true inventors in the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature biotechnology
Nature biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
63.00
自引率
1.70%
发文量
382
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature Biotechnology is a monthly journal that focuses on the science and business of biotechnology. It covers a wide range of topics including technology/methodology advancements in the biological, biomedical, agricultural, and environmental sciences. The journal also explores the commercial, political, ethical, legal, and societal aspects of this research. The journal serves researchers by providing peer-reviewed research papers in the field of biotechnology. It also serves the business community by delivering news about research developments. This approach ensures that both the scientific and business communities are well-informed and able to stay up-to-date on the latest advancements and opportunities in the field. Some key areas of interest in which the journal actively seeks research papers include molecular engineering of nucleic acids and proteins, molecular therapy, large-scale biology, computational biology, regenerative medicine, imaging technology, analytical biotechnology, applied immunology, food and agricultural biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology. In summary, Nature Biotechnology is a comprehensive journal that covers both the scientific and business aspects of biotechnology. It strives to provide researchers with valuable research papers and news while also delivering important scientific advancements to the business community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信