中性粒细胞CD64作为败血症死亡率的预后生物标志物:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Seo Hee Yoon, Sohyun Eun
{"title":"中性粒细胞CD64作为败血症死亡率的预后生物标志物:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Seo Hee Yoon, Sohyun Eun","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality worldwide. While neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) has demonstrated superior performance in detecting sepsis compared to conventional biomarkers, its prognostic value remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the performance of nCD64 in predicting mortality in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 28, 2025, to identify relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged 16 years or older diagnosed with sepsis based on Sepsis-1, Sepsis-2, or Sepsis-3 criteria.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Studies assessing the predictive accuracy of nCD64 for mortality and providing sufficient data for contingency table construction were included.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall predictive accuracy was assessed using the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies involving 756 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of nCD64 for predicting mortality were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.87), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), and 7.71 (95% CI: 4.38-13.57), respectively. The predictive accuracy was 0.80.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that nCD64 may serve as a valuable auxiliary biomarker for identifying patients with sepsis at higher risk of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrophil CD64 as a prognostic biomarker for mortality in sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Seo Hee Yoon, Sohyun Eun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality worldwide. While neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) has demonstrated superior performance in detecting sepsis compared to conventional biomarkers, its prognostic value remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the performance of nCD64 in predicting mortality in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 28, 2025, to identify relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged 16 years or older diagnosed with sepsis based on Sepsis-1, Sepsis-2, or Sepsis-3 criteria.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Studies assessing the predictive accuracy of nCD64 for mortality and providing sufficient data for contingency table construction were included.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall predictive accuracy was assessed using the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies involving 756 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of nCD64 for predicting mortality were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.87), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), and 7.71 (95% CI: 4.38-13.57), respectively. The predictive accuracy was 0.80.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that nCD64 may serve as a valuable auxiliary biomarker for identifying patients with sepsis at higher risk of mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脓毒症仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要原因。虽然中性粒细胞CD64 (nCD64)在检测败血症方面表现出比传统生物标志物更优越的性能,但其预后价值尚不清楚。本荟萃分析评估了nCD64在预测败血症患者死亡率方面的表现。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。设置:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,检索截止到2025年1月28日,以确定相关研究。患者:根据败血症-1、败血症-2或败血症-3标准诊断为败血症的16岁或以上患者。干预措施:纳入了评估nCD64预测死亡率准确性的研究,并为应急表的构建提供了足够的数据。主要感兴趣的变量:以95%置信区间(ci)计算合并敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比(DOR)。总体预测准确度评估使用面积下的总结接收者工作特征曲线。结果:纳入8项研究,涉及756例患者。nCD64预测死亡率的敏感性、特异性和DOR分别为0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.87)、0.67 (95% CI: 0.56-0.77)和7.71 (95% CI: 4.38-13.57)。预测准确率为0.80。结论:我们的研究结果表明,nCD64可以作为一种有价值的辅助生物标志物,用于识别死亡风险较高的败血症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neutrophil CD64 as a prognostic biomarker for mortality in sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Sepsis remains a major cause of mortality worldwide. While neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) has demonstrated superior performance in detecting sepsis compared to conventional biomarkers, its prognostic value remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the performance of nCD64 in predicting mortality in patients with sepsis.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Settings: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted up to January 28, 2025, to identify relevant studies.

Patients: Patients aged 16 years or older diagnosed with sepsis based on Sepsis-1, Sepsis-2, or Sepsis-3 criteria.

Interventions: Studies assessing the predictive accuracy of nCD64 for mortality and providing sufficient data for contingency table construction were included.

Main variables of interest: Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall predictive accuracy was assessed using the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: Eight studies involving 756 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of nCD64 for predicting mortality were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.87), 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56-0.77), and 7.71 (95% CI: 4.38-13.57), respectively. The predictive accuracy was 0.80.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that nCD64 may serve as a valuable auxiliary biomarker for identifying patients with sepsis at higher risk of mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信