[不同重建算法和降噪强度对上腹部伪人幻像低对比度可检测性的评价]。

Haruna Hatakeyama, Yoshitaka Ota, Akio Tamura
{"title":"[不同重建算法和降噪强度对上腹部伪人幻像低对比度可检测性的评价]。","authors":"Haruna Hatakeyama, Yoshitaka Ota, Akio Tamura","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.25-1507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effects of reconstruction algorithm and noise reduction intensity on low-contrast detectability in abdominal CT examinations were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FBP, hybrid IR, and deep learning-based reconstruction methods (DLR for body, DLR for body sharp) were compared using an upper abdominal pseudo-human phantom. Imaging was performed under four radiation dose conditions, with three noise reduction intensities, and NPS and CNR<sub>LO</sub> were used as evaluation indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLR for body sharp showed excellent low-contrast detection performance with strong noise reduction and achieved a higher CNR<sub>LO</sub> than the others. Hybrid IR and DLR for body showed equivalent performance regardless of noise reduction intensity, confirming the limitations of low-frequency noise suppression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important to select a reconstruction algorithm and noise reduction intensity according to the purpose of the examination, and DLR for body sharp is useful for improving image quality and reducing exposure at low doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"81 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of Low-contrast Detectability of Different Reconstruction Algorithms and Noise Reduction Intensities in the Upper Abdominal Pseudo-human Phantom].\",\"authors\":\"Haruna Hatakeyama, Yoshitaka Ota, Akio Tamura\",\"doi\":\"10.6009/jjrt.25-1507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effects of reconstruction algorithm and noise reduction intensity on low-contrast detectability in abdominal CT examinations were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FBP, hybrid IR, and deep learning-based reconstruction methods (DLR for body, DLR for body sharp) were compared using an upper abdominal pseudo-human phantom. Imaging was performed under four radiation dose conditions, with three noise reduction intensities, and NPS and CNR<sub>LO</sub> were used as evaluation indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DLR for body sharp showed excellent low-contrast detection performance with strong noise reduction and achieved a higher CNR<sub>LO</sub> than the others. Hybrid IR and DLR for body showed equivalent performance regardless of noise reduction intensity, confirming the limitations of low-frequency noise suppression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is important to select a reconstruction algorithm and noise reduction intensity according to the purpose of the examination, and DLR for body sharp is useful for improving image quality and reducing exposure at low doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":\"81 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨重建算法和降噪强度对腹部CT低对比度检测的影响。方法:使用上腹部假人幻影,比较FBP、混合IR和基于深度学习的重建方法(身体DLR、身体尖锐DLR)。在4种辐射剂量条件下,采用3种降噪强度进行成像,以NPS和CNRLO为评价指标。结果:对body sharp的DLR具有出色的低对比度检测性能和较强的降噪能力,实现了较高的CNRLO。无论降噪强度如何,车身混合IR和DLR的性能相当,证实了低频噪声抑制的局限性。结论:根据检查目的选择重建算法和降噪强度是很重要的,体尖的DLR对于提高图像质量和减少低剂量照射是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of Low-contrast Detectability of Different Reconstruction Algorithms and Noise Reduction Intensities in the Upper Abdominal Pseudo-human Phantom].

Purpose: The effects of reconstruction algorithm and noise reduction intensity on low-contrast detectability in abdominal CT examinations were investigated.

Methods: FBP, hybrid IR, and deep learning-based reconstruction methods (DLR for body, DLR for body sharp) were compared using an upper abdominal pseudo-human phantom. Imaging was performed under four radiation dose conditions, with three noise reduction intensities, and NPS and CNRLO were used as evaluation indices.

Results: DLR for body sharp showed excellent low-contrast detection performance with strong noise reduction and achieved a higher CNRLO than the others. Hybrid IR and DLR for body showed equivalent performance regardless of noise reduction intensity, confirming the limitations of low-frequency noise suppression.

Conclusion: It is important to select a reconstruction algorithm and noise reduction intensity according to the purpose of the examination, and DLR for body sharp is useful for improving image quality and reducing exposure at low doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信