利用远程医疗管理农村和偏远地区的多病:对干预措施、结果和实施动态的范围审查。

Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity Pub Date : 2025-06-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26335565251344433
Sage M C Ishimwe, Delia Hendrie, Timothy A Carey, Jacquita S Affandi, Ninh Thi Ha, Sue Critchley, Amna Mushtaq, Sayyida Anees, Harley Sitou, Chak Seng Song, Brian Leong, Anneli Robbshaw, Christopher M Reid, Dan Xu
{"title":"利用远程医疗管理农村和偏远地区的多病:对干预措施、结果和实施动态的范围审查。","authors":"Sage M C Ishimwe, Delia Hendrie, Timothy A Carey, Jacquita S Affandi, Ninh Thi Ha, Sue Critchley, Amna Mushtaq, Sayyida Anees, Harley Sitou, Chak Seng Song, Brian Leong, Anneli Robbshaw, Christopher M Reid, Dan Xu","doi":"10.1177/26335565251344433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity, the coexistence of two or more chronic diseases, affects 37% of adults globally, especially in rural areas with limited healthcare access. This burden leads to poorer health outcomes. Telehealth offers a solution by improving access to care. This scoping review explored the use of telehealth for managing multimorbidity in rural and remote areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A protocol was registered on Open Science Framework. Four databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from 2010 to 2024, focusing on telehealth interventions for multimorbidity in rural and remote areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9,090 screened records, 15 articles were included in the review. Eight articles reported health outcomes (including five randomised controlled trials), while seven identified facilitators and barriers. Telehealth interventions were categorised as synchronous (5/15) and asynchronous (10/15), and they predominantly targeted physical health conditions (73%). Mixed effects on physiological outcomes were noted, with some studies reporting reductions in blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin. Mental health outcomes generally showed significant reductions in depression and anxiety. Facilitators included telehealth infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, and digital literacy, while barriers reflected the opposite.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights that telehealth interventions can be cost-effective and improve access and health outcomes in rural and remote areas. However, the variability in findings emphasises the need for standardised implementation and further research to ascertain reliability. Future studies should explore strategies to address barriers and optimise telehealth interventions for managing multimorbidity in these settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","volume":"15 ","pages":"26335565251344433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing telehealth for multimorbidity management in rural and remote areas: A scoping review of interventions, outcomes, and implementation dynamics.\",\"authors\":\"Sage M C Ishimwe, Delia Hendrie, Timothy A Carey, Jacquita S Affandi, Ninh Thi Ha, Sue Critchley, Amna Mushtaq, Sayyida Anees, Harley Sitou, Chak Seng Song, Brian Leong, Anneli Robbshaw, Christopher M Reid, Dan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26335565251344433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity, the coexistence of two or more chronic diseases, affects 37% of adults globally, especially in rural areas with limited healthcare access. This burden leads to poorer health outcomes. Telehealth offers a solution by improving access to care. This scoping review explored the use of telehealth for managing multimorbidity in rural and remote areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A protocol was registered on Open Science Framework. Four databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from 2010 to 2024, focusing on telehealth interventions for multimorbidity in rural and remote areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9,090 screened records, 15 articles were included in the review. Eight articles reported health outcomes (including five randomised controlled trials), while seven identified facilitators and barriers. Telehealth interventions were categorised as synchronous (5/15) and asynchronous (10/15), and they predominantly targeted physical health conditions (73%). Mixed effects on physiological outcomes were noted, with some studies reporting reductions in blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin. Mental health outcomes generally showed significant reductions in depression and anxiety. Facilitators included telehealth infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, and digital literacy, while barriers reflected the opposite.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights that telehealth interventions can be cost-effective and improve access and health outcomes in rural and remote areas. However, the variability in findings emphasises the need for standardised implementation and further research to ascertain reliability. Future studies should explore strategies to address barriers and optimise telehealth interventions for managing multimorbidity in these settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"26335565251344433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251344433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251344433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多病,即两种或两种以上慢性病的共存,影响着全球37%的成年人,特别是在医疗保健服务有限的农村地区。这种负担导致较差的健康结果。远程保健通过改善获得保健的机会提供了一种解决办法。这一范围审查探讨了利用远程保健管理农村和偏远地区的多种疾病。方法:在开放科学框架上注册一个协议。在四个数据库中检索了2010年至2024年发表的同行评议的英文文章,这些文章的重点是农村和偏远地区多病症的远程医疗干预。结果:在9090篇筛选记录中,有15篇文章被纳入综述。八篇文章报告了健康结果(包括五项随机对照试验),七篇文章确定了促进因素和障碍。远程医疗干预分为同步(5/15)和异步(10/15),主要针对身体健康状况(73%)。注意到对生理结果的混合影响,一些研究报告血压和糖化血红蛋白降低。心理健康结果普遍显示抑郁和焦虑显著减少。促进因素包括远程医疗基础设施、利益相关者参与和数字素养,而障碍则相反。结论:本综述强调,远程保健干预措施具有成本效益,并可改善农村和偏远地区的可及性和健康结果。然而,研究结果的可变性强调了标准化实施和进一步研究以确定可靠性的必要性。未来的研究应该探索解决这些障碍的策略,并优化远程医疗干预措施,以管理这些环境中的多病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing telehealth for multimorbidity management in rural and remote areas: A scoping review of interventions, outcomes, and implementation dynamics.

Background: Multimorbidity, the coexistence of two or more chronic diseases, affects 37% of adults globally, especially in rural areas with limited healthcare access. This burden leads to poorer health outcomes. Telehealth offers a solution by improving access to care. This scoping review explored the use of telehealth for managing multimorbidity in rural and remote areas.

Methods: A protocol was registered on Open Science Framework. Four databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from 2010 to 2024, focusing on telehealth interventions for multimorbidity in rural and remote areas.

Results: Out of 9,090 screened records, 15 articles were included in the review. Eight articles reported health outcomes (including five randomised controlled trials), while seven identified facilitators and barriers. Telehealth interventions were categorised as synchronous (5/15) and asynchronous (10/15), and they predominantly targeted physical health conditions (73%). Mixed effects on physiological outcomes were noted, with some studies reporting reductions in blood pressure and glycated haemoglobin. Mental health outcomes generally showed significant reductions in depression and anxiety. Facilitators included telehealth infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, and digital literacy, while barriers reflected the opposite.

Conclusion: This review highlights that telehealth interventions can be cost-effective and improve access and health outcomes in rural and remote areas. However, the variability in findings emphasises the need for standardised implementation and further research to ascertain reliability. Future studies should explore strategies to address barriers and optimise telehealth interventions for managing multimorbidity in these settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信